Skip to main content

Use and uptake of web-based therapeutic interventions amongst Indigenous populations in Australia, New Zealand, the United States of America and Canada: a scoping review

Abstract

Background

Barriers to receiving optimal healthcare exist for Indigenous populations globally for a range of reasons. To overcome such barriers and enable greater access to basic and specialist care, developments in information and communication technologies are being applied. The focus of this scoping review is on web-based therapeutic interventions (WBTI) that aim to provide guidance, support and treatment for health problems.

Objectives

This review identifies and describes international scientific evidence on WBTI used by Indigenous peoples in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and USA for managing and treating a broad range of health conditions.

Eligibility criteria

Studies assessing WBTI designed for Indigenous peoples in Australia, Canada, USA and New Zealand, that were published in English, in peer-reviewed literature, from 2006 to 2018 (inclusive), were considered for inclusion in the review. Studies were considered if more than 50% of participants were Indigenous, or if results were reported separately for Indigenous participants.

Sources of evidence

Following a four-step search strategy in consultation with a research librarian, 12 databases were searched with a view to finding both published and unpublished studies.

Charting methods

Data was extracted, synthesised and reported under four main conceptual categories: (1) types of WBTI used, (2) community uptake of WBTI, (3) factors that impact on uptake and (4) conclusions and recommendations for practice.

Results

A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. The WBTI used were interactive websites, screening and assessment tools, management and monitoring tools, gamified avatar-based psychological therapy and decision support tools. Other sources reported the use of mobile apps, multimedia messaging or a mixture of intervention tools. Most sources reported moderate uptake and improved health outcomes for Indigenous people. Suggestions to improve uptake included as follows: tailoring content and presentation formats to be culturally relevant and appropriate, customisable and easy to use.

Conclusions

Culturally appropriate, evidence-based WBTI have the potential to improve health, overcome treatment barriers and reduce inequalities for Indigenous communities. Access to WBTI, alongside appropriate training, allows health care workers to better support their Indigenous clients. Developing WBTI in partnership with Indigenous communities ensures that these interventions are accepted and promoted by the communities.

Peer Review reports

Background

Indigenous populations in Australia, New Zealand, the United States of America (USA) and Canada carry a greater burden of ill-health than the general populations in their respective countries [1]. In each of these countries, Indigenous populations also experience barriers to receiving optimal health care due to mistrust of the health system resulting from historic and current mistreatment, language and cultural differences and living in geographically remote locations [1]. Globally, developments in health information and communication technologies (ICT) have been applied to overcome such barriers and to enable greater access to basic and specialist care [2].

In recent years, technological advances have also led to the development of therapeutic interventions delivered electronically for a range of health conditions. The focus of this review is on web-based therapeutic interventions (WBTI), which are self-guided or clinician-assisted programmes delivered via the internet that aim to provide guidance, support and treatment for health problems. The proliferation of mobile devices, including smart phones and electronic tablets, means that web-based programmes and mobile applications (“apps”) can be accessed at low cost by a range of populations, including culturally and linguistically diverse, or other populations who may be otherwise disengaged with the health system for a range of reasons.

In Australia, despite the challenges inherent in remote living, compounded by socioeconomic disadvantage, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations have high rates of social platform use, indicating high levels of internet connectivity [3]. The recent roll-out of the “National Broadband Network” (NBN) in non-urban areas and other advances in technology have resulted in the rise of telecommunication access in remote areas, where internet access was previously limited [4]. In recent years, the increase in use of social platforms has been significantly greater amongst Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders compared with that for all Australians, and a high level of engagement with social platforms has been evident in the health sector [5,6,7]. Together, advancements and high level use of ICT by Indigenous Australians across all areas of remoteness and sociodemographic spectrum clearly indicate a potential to engage with individuals directly through social platforms, particularly with younger people.

The use of digital health platforms has been advocated to incorporate a wider approach to include social determinants of health and wellbeing [5], given the feasibility of capturing personalised health-related social and behavioural information that was not previously accessible, with direct implications to people living with chronic diseases. Worldwide, there are over 250,000 different consumer-targeted mobile health apps, though few have been rigorously evaluated regarding the accuracy of information they provide, privacy and digital security protections, and their usability, functionality and effectiveness in the context of health [8]. As the use of online therapies continues to grow, this review of international evidence on WBTI for health conditions amongst Indigenous populations is timely.

A previous scoping study has examined the evidence for the effectiveness of web-based and mobile technologies in health promotion, specifically to reach Indigenous Australians [9]. This valuable piece of work focused on social media and mobile apps primarily for smoking cessation, many of which did not appear in the peer-reviewed literature. The current review provides an update on the peer-reviewed evidence of the acceptability, validity and effectiveness of WBTI for a broad range of health conditions, extending the review to include WBTI developed with Indigenous people internationally for communicable and non-communicable diseases, mental health conditions (including the broader concept of social and emotional wellbeing), or issues relating to the use of harmful substances, and problem gambling. The objective of this scoping review is to identify and describe the available international scientific evidence on WBTI used by Indigenous peoples in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and USA for managing and treating health conditions. These four countries were included due to similar persistent patterns of inequities that have arisen in these countries since colonisation, as well as geographic and demographic similarities such as remoteness from health services and differing language, culture and concepts of health and illness from the dominant culture [1]. Additionally, these four countries have other commonalities which allow for comparison; they are developed, democratic, wealthy countries with similar standard of living and life expectancy [10].

Methods

The study protocol for this scoping review has been published previously [11]. Methods followed the procedures outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute [12, 13] with reporting adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines scoping review extension [14]. The relevant PRISMA checklist is included as an additional file.

Information sources

A systematic search was conducted of the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, ATSIHealth via Informit online, Web of Science, APAIS Health databases, Australian Indigenous Health InfoNet and the Primary Health Care Research Information Service (PHCRIS). A search for unpublished studies was conducted by accessing Mednar, Trove, Google, OCLC WorldCatDissertations and Theses, and Proquest Dissertations and Theses. The search in Trove was limited to theses only, as the assumption was made that other publication types would be captured in the other databases. To capture additional literature, a search of websites and clearing houses that provided information, links and resources relating to Indigenous health in each of the four countries that are the focus of this review was conducted using initial keywords including the following: Indigenous, Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, Maori, First Nations, First Peoples, Metis, Inuit, Native American, eHealth, telehealth, internet-based intervention and web-based therapeutic tool.

Search strategy

As outlined in the scoping review protocol [11], a four-step search strategy was followed in consultation with a research librarian, with a view to finding both published and unpublished studies. An initial limited search of PubMed was undertaken. The final search strategy for PubMed can be found in Table 1. An analysis of the text words contained in the titles and abstracts, and of the index terms used to describe articles then informed the development of search strategies tailored for each information source. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms was undertaken across all other information sources. The reference list of all studies selected for inclusion was screened for additional studies. The search strategy allowed for authors to be contacted and experts consulted with a view to accessing any unpublished data or for clarification of published information; however, this was not necessary in practice. The search was conducted on 10 April, 2019.

Table 1 Search Strategy for PubMed

Inclusion criteria

Date range

Studies published from 2006 to 2018 (inclusive) in English were considered for inclusion. This timeframe was considered sufficient to capture up-to-date evidence on WBTI that have grown in popularity in recent years.

Publication status

Peer-reviewed and grey literature meeting the inclusion criteria were considered for inclusion.

Participants

Studies assessing WBTI designed for Indigenous peoples of any age in Australia, Canada, USA and New Zealand were considered for inclusion in the review. Participants could be accessing the WBTI to prevent, manage or treat their own health condition; or could be healthcare providers, friends or family members accessing a WBTI to assist an Indigenous person with a health condition. Studies were considered if more than 50% of participants were Indigenous, or if results were reported separately for the Indigenous participants.

Concept

The focus of this review was on the use and uptake of WBTI by Indigenous people. The range of possible health issues the WBTI could address was deliberately broad and included chronic physical illness, communicable disease, mental health conditions and issues relating to social and emotional wellbeing, use of harmful substances or gambling. Studies were considered for inclusion if they provided information on WBTI used by individuals or groups: either autonomously or with assistance, to assess, manage or treat health conditions by (a) modifying lifestyle behaviours, (b) promoting social and emotional wellbeing and resilience, (c) supporting adherence to treatment regimens, (d) increasing motivation to reduce risky behaviours and (e) providing and supporting strategies to reduce dependence on alcohol, prescription drugs, illicit substances or gambling. Evaluations of websites that only provide health education without any interactive or therapeutic content were excluded. This included interventions involving health information kiosks or telehealth as the sole intervention strategy.

Context

Health-related WBTI accessed in any setting in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and USA were included.

Selection of sources

Following the search, all identified citations were uploaded into EndnoteTM (Version X8.1, Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, USA) and duplicates removed. Citations were then entered into an online systematic review management system (www.covidence.org, 2019, Veritas Health Innovation Ltd, Melbourne, Australia). Titles and abstracts were screened against the inclusion criteria by one researcher (RR), as well as independently by one of two other researchers (SH, IF). Disagreements were resolved through discussion between all three reviewers. Studies that potentially met the inclusion criteria were retrieved in full and imported into Covidence for full text review. The full texts of selected studies were assessed in detail against the inclusion criteria by at least two reviewers (RR, and either SH, FS or IF). Full text studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded and reasons for exclusion recorded.

Data charting and synthesis

Two data extraction tools were developed for this scoping review [11], which were further refined during the data charting process. This tool facilitated the extraction of the data mapped to the variables outlined in Table 2. Extracted data was synthesised and reported under four main conceptual categories: (1) types of WBTI used, (2) community uptake of WBTI, (3) factors that impact on uptake and (4) conclusions and recommendations for practice.

Table 2 Data extraction variables

Results

Sources of evidence

The systematic searches identified 8182 references and one additional reference was identified through other sources (Fig. 1). After duplicates were removed, there were 1618 unique papers for review. The large number of duplicates stems from many studies being duplicated across multiple databases. Title and abstract screening excluded 1420 references, and a further 166 papers were excluded on full-text review, resulting in 31 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for this scoping review.

Fig. 1
figure1

PRISMA flow diagram of the complete search process

Characteristics of sources

As shown in Table 3, 11 (34%) sources were from the USA [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25] and nine (28%) sources were from New Zealand [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], with the remainder from Australia (12, 38%) [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. As there were no studies from Canada, the findings reported from here on pertain to New Zealand, the USA and Australia. The majority reported evaluation studies (52%) [16,17,18, 22, 23, 25, 29, 31, 32, 34,35,36, 38, 39, 43, 45] and had prospective (94%) data collection [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28, 30,31,32,33, 35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43, 45]. There was an increasing number of publications over time. As shown in Table 4, health topics addressed in the reported studies were varied; however, mental health (32%) [24, 27, 31, 32, 36, 37, 39, 41,42,43] and substance use (19%) [16, 18, 21, 22, 28] were the two prominent issues targeted. Most sources reported studies that focused on interventions with consumers (82%), although four (18%) [24, 34, 36, 37, 39, 43] sources reported the use of WBTI to support healthcare workers. There were no clear patterns of similarity or differences between countries in any of the variables reported.

Table 3 General characteristics of included publications
Table 4 Multi-way cross-classification matrix: health focus, delivery mode and intervention by country

Types of WBTI used

The types of WBTI described in the source publications are presented in Tables 4 and 5. The majority of the interventions used in these studies were interactive websites (n = 21, of 25 interventions in the 32 studies, 84%), providing education modules and tutorials [15, 16, 19, 22, 25,26,27, 29, 36], screening and assessment tools [18, 21], management and monitoring tools [20, 23, 28, 34, 38], gamified avatar-based cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) [31, 32] and decision support tools [24, 30]. Seven sources reported the use of mobile “apps” [17, 33, 39, 41,42,43, 45], two sources incorporated the use of text or multimedia messaging service [35, 40] and two sources studied an intervention that used a mixture of intervention tools [37, 44].

Table 5 Summary of research findings from included publications

Most interventions were self-directed (n = 19, 61.3%), requiring the user to access the WBTI program, often according to a pre-defined schedule, without support from an outside agency or healthcare worker [16, 18, 19, 21,22,23,24,25,26, 29,30,31,32,33,34, 37, 38, 41, 42, 45]. The remainder of the interventions were either supported by a healthcare worker or other personnel [17, 20, 27, 28, 35, 36, 39, 43, 44], were supported initially but then relied on users to be self-directed thereafter [15] or were passive [40], such as the receipt of intermittent text messages that contained health messages or graphics intended to prompt a behavioural response.

Uptake and effects of WBTI

The bulk of the sources reported improved health outcomes for Indigenous people [15, 16, 18,19,20, 22, 24, 28, 31, 33,34,35,36,37,38, 41]. For the three studies that reported uptake, voluntary uptake of WBTI was between 30 and 56% [15, 27, 36, 37]. The remainder of the sources had the WBTI as a prescribed component of the reported intervention or evaluation study so rate of uptake is not relevant; however, contextual factors identified by study authors as influences on uptake, use and acceptability are discussed below.

None of the WBTI approaches had a negative impact on participants. However, some WBTI were more successful than others. Two randomised clinical trials reported statistically significant differences in quantitative measures of depression amongst Indigenous adolescents (USA and NZ) who used WBTI “apps” compared to those who did not [27, 42], while a qualitative study found substantial improvements in mood amongst Maori adolescents who used a gamified app [32]. An interventional study using WBTI with Native Americans for diabetes control showed a statistically significant improvement in glycated haemoglobin levels [23], and an educational tool for preventing sudden infant death in New Zealand significantly increased the confidence of Maori people to discuss infant sleep safety with others compared with non-Indigenous people [26].

Two sources reported no impact of the intervention. In the USA, risky drinking behaviour by women living in California decreased regardless of whether they received the WBTI or “usual care” [21]. In Australia, while health messages sent via text message did not impact on clinic attendance for children with otitis media [40], the content delivered in local Indigenous languages was found to be culturally appropriate and recipients were happy to receive the information.

Explanations for uptake

While some sources provided no explicit explanations for uptake success or failure [18, 30, 35], most did. Sources suggested a variety of factors that could improve WBTI uptake; however, the most important was ensuring that WBTI were designed for the audience [23, 44], culturally relevant and appropriate [40, 41, 43], by having culturally relevant graphics, voices and animations [40], and showing traditional practices, culture and Indigenous peoples [16, 44]. It was also important that content was matched to participants’ values and experiences. For example, Campbell et al. [16] reported that ratings of some modules varied according to experiences of discrimination or mainstream comfort. Cultural appropriateness of the WBTI was explicitly discussed and/or evaluated in all but four sources [26, 30, 34, 35]. Where authors discussed cultural appropriateness, it was linked to better outcomes in terms of acceptability, uptake and impact, whether or not this was formally evaluated. Seven sources reported recommendations from their study populations on features to improve so as to ensure the WBTI contain a greater volume of culturally appropriate content [16, 30, 33, 34, 40, 44].

In addition, sources reported that users wanted WBTI to have an innovative and visually appealing format [43] and be useful [24, 43], interesting [24] and thought-provoking [24]. These interventions fostered conversations [24] and resulted in improved patient-practitioner relationship which led to better health monitoring by patients [20, 29]. However, one source reported that videos sent via multimedia messaging services may be unclear or confusing and suggested that simple text messages may be more effective [40]. Users like the flexible delivery that WBTI allow [23, 38] and want WBTI to be easy to use [41, 43] and customisable [38]. However, users also preferred to be able to download the “app” or software for free [41]. Limited access to internet or a phone were found to be prohibitive factors by users [15, 41], with mental health workers reporting significant organisational and personal barriers to accessing mental health web-based apps [36]. Systemic or policy contexts that influenced uptake and use included the following: organisational support for the WBTI [36], access to the internet or other technology due to cost or the availability of infrastructure [15, 23, 39,40,41], underlying burden of disease [29] and funding to reduce the cost to end-users [31, 41].

Recommendations and conclusions from the sources

Culturally appropriate, evidence-based WBTI have the potential to improve mental health [27, 32, 42], address substance abuse treatment barriers [16], improve self-efficacy and self-management in healthcare [23, 26] and reduce inequalities in access to healthcare services, for Indigenous communities. WBTI are a cost-effective method of delivering information and engaging target populations, such as youth [22, 28] and pregnant women [18], to reduce hazardous and harmful alcohol intake. In fact, one source reported that using a WBTI to self-assess risky drinking behaviour may be enough to influence behavioural change, without implementation of an intervention [21].

Thus far, evaluations of smoking cessation WBTI for Indigenous populations have been limited to America [15, 25]. These evaluations concluded that additional long-term, rigorous research is needed to assess WBTI approaches to keep American Indian and Alaskan Native youth from becoming regular smokers [15] and that future research needs to include both urban and rural Indigenous youth [25], highlighting that to date no online tobacco programmes have been designed specifically for these populations [15].

Sources that evaluated the use of mental health WBTI for Indigenous populations concluded that these interventions are likely to be important in overcoming poor access to services for remote communities [39, 43], or for youth that might be reluctant to engage in traditional health services [27]. Further, developing WBTI in partnership with Indigenous communities ensures culturally appropriate interventions that are accepted and promoted by the communities [24, 31,32,33, 42, 44], and lead to improved wellbeing of Indigenous people [41]. In addition, improved access to culturally appropriate WBTI tools, and training in how to use these tools, allows mental health workers to better support their Indigenous clients [36, 37, 39].

Cardiovascular disease risk data for Maori people can be successfully generated in real time through the use of an electronic decision support tool [30]. In addition, cardiac rehabilitation care delivered through WBTI platform has the potential to significantly improve outcomes for Indigenous populations [38]. However, other researchers suggest that the use of WBTI for cardiac care should not occur in isolation, instead emphasising that WBTI should be complemented by a comprehensive care program [34].

Implementing culturally appropriate WBTI for the self-management of diabetes has been shown to be feasible [19]. The use of such platforms has been shown to improve diabetes control in Indigenous populations [23], possibly because these interventions may increase the frequency patients monitor their blood glucose levels [20].

The remainder of sources identified for inclusion in this review also recommended WBTI as positively supporting Indigenous communities. WBTI were shown to have the potential to be a useful tool for dieticians working to optimise the food and nutrient intakes of pregnant women [35] and may reduce sudden unexpected infant deaths by increasing education beyond traditional face-to-face delivery methods [26]. Research demonstrated the importance of designing culturally appropriate WBTI to promote health through understanding and use of natural resources [17], to increase ear health knowledge [40] and to improve asthma education [29].

Discussion

The purpose of this review was to identify and describe the available international scientific evidence on WBTI used by Indigenous peoples in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and USA for managing and treating health conditions. As mobile devices, including smart phones, become ubiquitous in the general population, web-based and other electronic interventions are increasing in number and scope. This is indicated by an increase in studies on the topic year on year, and of the many protocols that were excluded from this scoping review, but which clearly indicate a growing field with many studies planned or underway. The results indicate that while WBTI are most commonly designed to manage mental health and substance use issues, they are increasingly being incorporated in the range of treatment and support options for a variety of health conditions and are being used by those with the health condition or by service providers.

The popularity of WBTI stems in part from their potential reach, which extends to anyone in any geographical location or social context where they have access to the internet and a device capable of running the program. While increases in internet access amongst Indigenous populations in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and USA have been reported, in each of these countries, a “digital divide” across ethnic and geographical lines also exists, with Indigenous households and individuals having less access to the internet overall, and internet access being lowest in those geographical areas with the highest proportion of Indigenous residents [46]. The lack of any studies from Canada meeting the inclusion criteria was surprising, however there is evidence that other forms of ICT, such as telehealth, are in use in Canada, and that First Nations communities are engaging with and developing digital health technologies in line with Indigenous models of health and wellbeing [47].

The available data indicates that young people tend to have greater internet access and use [48] so it is perhaps not surprising that adolescents or young people were the focus of a large proportion of studies (8/34). Indigenous populations in Australia, USA, Canada and New Zealand are younger than the general populations in each country [46, 49,50,51], so interventions designed to improve the wellbeing of young people are particularly relevant. However, there were several studies of WBTI focusing on chronic diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease that are relevant to older people.

Perhaps the most common and clear lesson articulated by study authors was the importance of developing programmes in collaboration with the target communities. In this sense, WBTI are no different to other interventions, with issues of governance and ownership being central not only to the ethical delivery of programmes but also to their acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness. Several authors cited “co-design” or collaborative design as strengths of their projects. Having the target community involved in all aspects of intervention and study design is in line with ethical guidelines for research with Indigenous peoples internationally [52,53,54,55].

Meta-analysis of effectiveness was beyond the remit of this scoping review, and while such analysis is likely to be limited by the small sample sizes evident in these studies, future research could usefully examine both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of WBTI with Indigenous people. Cost-effectiveness is frequently highlighted as an advantage of WBTI. However, few studies include analysis of cost-effectiveness that incorporates the often-substantial costs of development that may occur over lengthy time periods. This scoping review was limited in the degree to which it could examine barriers to accessing WBTI resulting from cultural and linguistic diversity, low health literacy, limited digital capabilities and infrastructural and resource limitations for individuals and communities in different geographic locations. This review is also based on a definition of health that is less holistic and relational than Indigenous models of health and wellbeing tend to be [1]. Future research could focus more explicitly on a broader range of social health factors, such as language use and reclamation, as these are likely to have health benefit from an Indigenous perspective [56]. Broadening the review to include digital sources, such as app stores and social media, could also provide a more comprehensive account of all indigenous-focused WBTI and tools, although formal evaluations of such interventions, which are the focus of this review, are unlikely to be sourced this way.

As mobile digital devices become cheaper and more widespread, and internet technology improves in speed and geographic coverage, it seems safe to assume that WBTI will also become more widespread, and of interest to health services and commercial entities who may wish to exploit potential markets. This is true for Indigenous peoples as it is for others, although the smaller population size may limit commercial interest in Indigenous-specific WBTI and explain the propensity of funding from government rather than commercial sources. As the field grows, ensuring that technologies accessed in Indigenous communities are high quality, evidence-based, culturally appropriate, inclusive and accessible will require that we continue to examine and re-examine the evidence as it emerges and that Aboriginal communities continue to lead the development of technologies that best meet their needs.

References

  1. 1.

    Pulver LJ, Haswell MR, Ring I, Waldon J, Clark W, Whetung V, Kinnon D, Graham C, Chino M, La Valley J, et al. Indigenous health - Australia, Canada, Aotearoa New Zealand and the United States - Laying claim to a future that embraces health for us all. In: World Health Organisation. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    WHO Global Observatory for eHealth. mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies. In: Global Observatory for eHealth series. Volume 3. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zeng EY, Vilardaga R, Heffner JL, Mull KE, Bricker JB. Predictors of Utilization of a Novel Smoking Cessation Smartphone App. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(12):998–1004.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rennie E, Yunkaporta T, Hulcombe-James I. Cyber safety in remote Aboriginal communities: Final Report. Melbourne: Digital Ethnography Research Centre; 2018.

  5. 5.

    Rice ES, Haynes E, Royce P, Thompson SC. Social media and digital technology use among Indigenous young people in Australia: a literature review. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15(84):81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ellway D, Reilly R, LeCouteur A, Ward J. Exploring how people affected by methamphetamine exchange social support through online interactions on Facebook: content analysis. JMIR Mental Health. 2019;6(10):e14011.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sweet MA. Social media: New links for indigenous health. Med J Aus. 2013;199(1):18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Australian Government. Safe, seamless and secure: evolving health and care to meet the needs of modern Australia. Australia's National Digital Health Strategy. Canberra: Australian Government Australian Digital Health Agency; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Brusse C, Gardner K, McAullay D, Dowden M. Social media and mobile apps for health promotion in Australian Indigenous populations: scoping review. JMIR. 2014;16(12):e280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shahid S, Thompson S. Authors’ response. Aus NZ J Public Health. 2010;34(1):91–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gibson O, Reilly R, Harfield S, Tufanaru C, Ward J. Web-based therapeutic interventions for assessing, managing and treating health conditions in Indigenous people: a scoping review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017;15(10):2487–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Khalil H, Peters M, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Soares CB, Parker D. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2016;13(2):118–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bowen DJ, Henderson PN, Harvill J, Buchwald D. Short-term effects of a smoking prevention website in American Indian youth. JMIR. 2012;14(3):e81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Campbell AN, Turrigiano E, Moore M, Miele GM, Rieckmann T, Hu MC, Kropp F, Ringor-Carty R, Nunes EV. Acceptability of a web-based community reinforcement approach for substance use disorders with treatment-seeking American Indians/Alaska Natives. Community Ment Health J. 2015;51(4):393–403.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dellinger MJ, Olson J, Clark R, Pingatore N, Ripley MP. Development and pilot testing of a model to translate risk assessment data for Great Lakes Native American communities using mobile technology. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2018;24(1):242–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gorman JR, Clapp JD, Calac D, Kolander C, Nyquist C, Chambers CD. Creating a culturally appropriate web-based behavioral intervention for American Indian/Alaska Native women in Southern California: the healthy women healthy Native nation study. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2013;20(1):1–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jernigan VBB, Lorig K. The Internet Diabetes Self-Management Workshop for American Indians and Alaska Natives. Health Promot Pract. 2011;12(2):261–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Levine BA, Turner JW, Robinson JD, Angelus P, Hu TM. Communication plays a critical role in web-based monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(3):461–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Montag AC, Brodine SK, Alcaraz JE, Clapp JD, Allison MA, Calac DJ, Hull AD, Gorman JR, Jones KL, Chambers CD. Preventing alcohol-exposed pregnancy among an American Indian/Alaska Native population: effect of a screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment intervention. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39(1):126–35.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Raghupathy S, Forth ALG. The HAWK2 program: A computer-based drug prevention intervention for Native American youth. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012;38(5):461–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Robertson C, Kattelmann K, Ren C. Control of type 2 diabetes mellitus using interactive internet-based support on a Northern Plains Indian reservation: a pilot study. Top Clin Nutr. 2007;22(2):185–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Starks H, Shaw JL, Hiratsuka V, Dillard DA, Robinson R. Engaging stakeholders to develop a depression management decision support tool in a tribal health system. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1097–105.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Taualii M, Bush N, Bowen DJ, Forquera R, Taualii M, Bush N, Bowen DJ, Forquera R. Adaptation of a smoking cessation and prevention website for urban American Indian/Alaska Native youth. J Cancer Educ. 2010;25(1):23–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cowan S, Pease A, Bennett S. Usage and impact of an online education tool for preventing sudden unexpected death in infancy. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49(3):228–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fleming T, Dixon R, Frampton C, Merry S. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of computerized CBT (SPARX) for symptoms of depression among adolescents excluded from mainstream education. Behav Cog Psychotherapy. 2012;40(5):529–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kypri K, McCambridge J, Vater T, Bowe SJ, Saunders JB, Cunningham JA, Horton NJ. Web-based alcohol intervention for Maori university students: double-blind, multi-site randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2013;108(2):331–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ram FS, McNaughton W. Giving Asthma Support to Patients (GASP): a novel online asthma education, monitoring, assessment and management tool. J Prim Health Care. 2014;6(3):238–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Riddell T, Jackson RT, Wells S, Broad J, Bannink L. Assessing Maori/non-Maori differences in cardiovascular disease risk and risk management in routine primary care practice using web-based clinical decision support: (PREDICT CVD-2). N Z Med J. 2007;120(1250):U2445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Shepherd M, Fleming T, Lucassen M, Stasiak K, Lambie I, Merry SN. The design and relevance of a computerized gamified depression therapy program for Indigenous Maori Adolescents. JMIR Serious Games. 2015;3(1):e1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shepherd M, Merry S, Lambie I, Thompson A. Indigenous adolescents’ perception of an eMental Health Program (SPARX): exploratory qualitative assessment. JMIR Serious Games. 2018;6(3):e13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Verbiest MEA, Corrigan C, Dalhousie S, Firestone R, Funaki T, Goodwin D, Grey J, Henry A, Humphrey G, Jull A, et al. Using codesign to develop a culturally tailored, behavior change mHealth intervention for indigenous and other priority communities: A case study in New Zealand. Transl Behav Med. 2018.

  34. 34.

    Whittaker R, Bramley D, Wells S, Stewart A, Selak V, Furness S, Rafter N, Roseman P, Jackson R. Will a web-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment programme increase the assessment of CVD risk factors for Maori? N Z Med J. 2006;119(1238):U2077.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ashman AM, Collins CE, Brown LJ, Rae KM, Rollo ME. A brief tool to assess image-based dietary records and guide nutrition counselling among pregnant women: an evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(4):e123.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bennett-Levy J, Singer J, DuBois S, Hyde K. Translating E-Mental health into practice: what are the barriers and enablers to E-Mental health implementation by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Professionals? JMIR. 2017;19(1).

  37. 37.

    Bird J, Rotumah D, Bennett-Levy J, Singer J. Diversity in eMental Health Practice: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Service Providers. JMIR Ment Health. 2017;4(2):e17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bradford D, Hansen D, Karunanithi M. Making an APPropriate care program for indigenous cardiac disease: customization of an existing cardiac rehabilitation program. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:343–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Dingwall KM, Puszka S, Sweet M, Mills PPJR, Nagel T. Evaluation of a culturally adapted training course in Indigenous e-mental health. Australasian Psychiatry. 2015;23(6):630–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Phillips JH, Wigger C, Beissbarth J, McCallum GB, Leach A, Morris PS. Can mobile phone multimedia messages and text messages improve clinic attendance for Aboriginal children with chronic otitis media? A randomised controlled trial. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;50(5):362–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Povey J, Mills PP, Dingwall KM, Lowell A, Singer J, Rotumah D, Bennett-Levy J, Nagel T. Acceptability of mental health apps for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians: a qualitative study. JMIR. 2016;18(3):e65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tighe J, Shand F, Ridani R, Mackinnon A, De La Mata N, Christensen H. Ibobbly mobile health intervention for suicide prevention in Australian Indigenous youth: a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dingwall KM, Puszka S, Sweet M, Nagel T. “Like drawing into sand”: acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of a new e-mental health resource for service providers working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People. Aus Psychol. 2015;50(1):60–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Fletcher R, Hammond C, Faulkner D, Turner N, Shipley L, Read D, Gwynn J. Stayin’ on track: the feasibility of developing internet and mobile phone based resources to support young Aboriginal fathers. Aus J Primary Health. 2017;23(4):329–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tonkin E, Jess L, Wycherley TP, Maher C, Smith R, Hart J, Cubillo B, Nut BH, Brimblecombe J. A smartphone app to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among young adults in Australian remote Indigenous communities: Design, formative evaluation and user-testing. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(12):e192.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2071.0 - Census of Population and Housing: Reflecting Australia - Stories from the Census, 2016. Canberra: ABS; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hensel JM, Ellard K, Koltek M, Wilson G, Sareen J. Digital health solutions for indigenous mental well-being. Curr Psychiatr Rep. 2019;21(8):68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Australian Bureau of Statistics. 8146.0 - Household Use of Information Technology, Australia, 2016-17. Canberra: ABS; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Statistics Canada. Focus on Geography Series, 2016 Census. Ottawa: Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-404-X2016001; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    United States Census Bureau. 2017 American Community Survey. Suitland: United States Census Bureau; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Stats NZ. How is our Maori population changing? Wellington: Stats NZ; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    National Health and Medical Research Council. Values and ethics: guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research. Canberra: NHMRC; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hudson M, Milne M, Reynolds P, Russell K, Smith B. Te Ara Tika: guidelines for Maori research ethics: a framework for researchers and ethics committee members. Auckland: Health Research Council of New Zealand; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Government of Canada. Chapter 9: Research Involving the First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples of Canada. In: Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa: Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kelley A, Belcourt-Dittloff A, Belcourt C, Belcourt G. Research ethics and indigenous communities. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(12):2146–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sivak L, Westhead S, Richards E, Atkinson S, Richards J, Dare H, Zuckermann G, Gee G, Wright M, Rosen A, et al. “Language breathes life” - Barngarla community perspectives on the wellbeing impacts of reclaiming a dormant Australian Aboriginal language. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(3918).

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Maureen Bell, Research Librarian at the University of Adelaide, for her assistance with the development of the search strategy, and Frida Svensson for her excellent project management. This research was conducted as part of a National Health and Medical Research Council funded project (#APP1100696). JW is Sylvia and Charles Viertel Senior Medical Research Fellow.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RR, SH, CT developed and tested search terms. RR conducted the searches and was primary reviewer. IF, SH, CT, OP and JW contributed to secondary review and data extraction. JM and JS assited with data charting and summarising. RR drafted the final manuscript with JS and JM, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Reilly.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reilly, R., Stephens, J., Micklem, J. et al. Use and uptake of web-based therapeutic interventions amongst Indigenous populations in Australia, New Zealand, the United States of America and Canada: a scoping review. Syst Rev 9, 123 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01374-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • e-mental health
  • Digital technology
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
  • Therapeutic intervention
  • Mobile health
  • e-health
  • Mental health
  • Chronic disease
  • Infectious disease
  • Information Technology
  • App