Systematic Reviews is published continuously online-only. We encourage you to sign up to receive free email alerts to keep up to date with all of the latest articles by registering here.
Call for papers: The role of systematic reviews in evidence-based research
Systematic Reviews invites submissions of manuscripts to our new thematic series highlighting the contribution that systematic reviews make in evidence-based research.
We welcome submissions of research articles, systematic reviews, methodology and commentaries.
Read MoreAims and scope
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
Trending articles
Click here to view which articles have been shared the most in the last month!
Articles
-
-
What is known about what works in community-involved decision-making relating to urban green and blue spaces? A realist review protocol
-
The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses
-
Mapping global evidence on injuries/trauma due to sexual and gender-based violence for research prioritisation and development of guidelines to mitigate their impact: a scoping review protocol
-
Chlorogenic acid in green bean coffee on body weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
-
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The Editorial to this article has been published in Systematic Reviews 2021 10:117
-
What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?
The Erratum to this article has been published in Systematic Reviews 2015 4:169
-
Drug discontinuation before contrast procedures and the effect on acute kidney injury and other clinical outcomes: a systematic review protocol
-
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study
Sign up to receive article alerts
Conducting a systematic review of animal studies?
Systematic Reviews considers protocols and results papers of systematic reviews of animal studies relevant for human health. You can now also prospectively register these reviews on PROSPERO.
Peer review mentoring
The Editors endorse peer review mentoring of early career researchers. Find out more here
Article collections
Thematic series
The role of systematic reviews in evidence-based research
Edited by Professor Dawid Pieper and Professor Hans Lund
Thematic series
Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care Evidence Reviews
Edited by Dr Ivan Florez
Thematic series
Automation in the systematic review process
Edited by Prof Joseph Lau
Thematic series
Five years of Systematic Reviews
Latest Tweets
View Twitter timeline
Your browser needs to have JavaScript enabled to view this timeline
Follow
Annual Journal Metrics
-
2022 Citation Impact
3.7 - 2-year Impact Factor
3.8 - 5-year Impact Factor
1.561 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
1.269 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)2022 Speed
153 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median)
340 days submission to accept (Median)2022 Usage
3,104,570 downloads
15,353 Altmetric mentions