Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Systematic review update
  • Open access
  • Published:

Effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on appetite: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

Systematic Reviews volume 13, Article number: 44 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The current studies explore the effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) on appetite.

Objective

To examine the effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) on appetite using a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials (CTs).

Patients and methods

Online databases including PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched up to January 2022. A random-effects model was used to compare the overall standardized mean difference in appetite scores between n-3 PUFAs supplemented and control individuals.

Results

Fifteen eligible CTs with 1504 participants (872 for n-3 PUFA supplementation and 632 for placebo groups) were included in our systematic review. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in overall appetite score between n-3 PUFAs supplemented and control groups (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.458, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.327, 1.242, P value = 0.25). However, the n-3 PUFA supplementation significantly increased the desire to eat (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI 0.116, 2.029, P = 0.02) compared to control.

Conclusion

Although we found no effect of omega-3 supplementation on overall appetite score, it modestly increases the desire to eat. Further CTs evaluating the effect of PUFAs on appetite are still needed to confirm these findings.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Dietary recommendations have emphasized the importance of fatty acid type rather than total dietary fat intake [1]. Many studies have explored the association between fatty acids’ chain length, degree of saturation, and position of the double bond of fatty acids consumed with cardiovascular diseases, inflammation, cancer, weight gain, and obesity [2,3,4,5]. Studies have also shown that saturated fatty acids (SFAs) are harmful to health, while beneficial health has been offered for monounsaturated (MUFAs) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) [6]. Omega-3 PUFAs’ sources include plant-based products (e.g., nuts, plant seeds, and their oils), seafood, or marine. High attention has been paid to the potential effect of different types of fatty acids on energy balance, weight, and appetite [7, 8].

Appetite is one of the important factors in controlling body weight which is regulated through both physiological and psychological factors [9]. Dietary fat composition could be changed through changes in the type of fatty acid intake which could affect the appetite [10]. Studies have examined appetite responses to meals enriched in different types of fatty acids and suggested that these different effects are via the physiochemical properties of fatty acids [11, 12]. However, there is little consensus on the relative role each may play in controlling food intake. A meta-analysis of controlled trials in patients with cancer cachexia showed n-3 PUFA supplementation did not improve body weight [13]. A study of 18 lean men showed no significant effect of fatty acid chain length on appetite [14]. Another study on 16 obese women reported that fatty acid composition did not differentially affect subjective appetite rating [15]. However, a study on 13 healthy Chinese men illustrated that PUFA-rich meals led to a decrease in appetite compared to MUFA-rich meals [5]. It is also proposed that n-3 PUFA supplementation might affect appetite control [16]. In particular, eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acids (DHA) intake have been reported as appetite modulators [17]. The mechanisms by which n-3 PUFAs reduce appetite are not well understood. The effect of n-3 PUFAs on fat metabolism and plasma concentrations of the appetite-suppressing hormones might explain the effect [18,19,20]. Several clinical trials have been conducted to examine the effect of n-3 PUFA fatty acids on appetite [11, 21]. However, they have led to inconsistent results. For instance, a study done in Georgia University showed that a diet rich in PUFAs has a greater effect on appetite suppression than a diet rich in monounsaturated fat [22]. Also, consumption of a diet rich in PUFAs in fifteen healthy American men resulted in suppression of postprandial hunger [23]. However, a randomized cross-over study among sixteen healthy American females showed that a liquid meal rich in PUFAs made no significant difference in hunger, fullness, or desire to eat [10].

To address the current controversy on the effect of n-3 PUFA intake on appetite, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials (CTs).

Methods

The present study is reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses [24].

Search strategy

We conducted a systematic literature review search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science (a list of WoS databases is in Supplementary Table 1) without language or any other restriction from the earliest available online indexing year to January 15, 2022. The search strategy included keywords and subject headings about n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (“Omega-3 Fatty Acid,” “Eicosapentaenoic Acid,” “EPA,” “DHA,” “docosahexaenoic acid,” “Omega-3,” “n-3,” “fish oil,”) and appetite (“Appetites,” “Appetite Alterations,” “satiety response,” “satiation,” “satiety,” “fullness,” “hunger,” “desire to eat,”). The full list of search terms used is in “Supplementary Table 1”. These searches were supplemented by reviewing the reference lists of trial publications.

Eligibility criteria

Two investigators screened the title and abstract which was followed by the full-text assessment of the eligible articles (BS and FT). All published CTs were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: (1) clinical trials that examined the effects of n-3 PUFAs intake on appetite, (2) the questionnaire for assessing appetite should be valid or clear, (3) n-3 PUFAs consumed as a supplement (not food), (4) individuals consumed n-3 PUFAs were not supplemented with other micro- and macronutrients, (5) the type of received n-3 PUFAs should be specified (EPA and DHA), (6) appetite was reported as a score or side effects, (7) appetite should be assessed by using a valid questionnaire, and (8) participants’ age should be ≥ 18 years. Nonhuman studies were excluded.

Screening process

Two independent authors (BS, FT) conducted the data extraction and evaluated the risk of bias. The possible discrepancies were solved by contacting the third author (ASA).

Data extraction

The following information was extracted: the first author’s last name, the year of publication, geographic location, study design, sample size and attrition, participant’s gender, age, health condition, duration of intervention, intervention dose, and types of n-3 PUFAs, inclusion criteria, and mean (and standard deviation) score of visual analog scale (VAS).

Risk of bias assessment

We assessed study quality using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool [25] which takes random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, and selection outcome reporting into account. A judgment of “low risk of bias”, “high risk of bias”, or “unclear risk of bias” was made for each domain based on Cochrane collaboration’s handbook [26].

Statistical analysis

The standardized difference in mean changes ± standard error (SE) in VAS score between participants assigned to n-3 PUFA supplementation and participants assigned to the control group. A random-effects model was used for calculating weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Cochran’s Q test was administered to test the statistical heterogeneity between studies. Also, we calculated the ratio of between-study variation to total variation (I2 statistic, range of this estimating is from 0 to 100%). I2 > 50% and P value < 0.05 were considered to indicate a significant heterogeneity between trials. Subgroup analyses based on health status, dose of PUFA supplementation, and risk of bias were administered to detect the source of potential heterogeneity between studies. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine if the individual study altered the results of meta-analyses significantly. The possibility of publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of a funnel plot of treatment effects versus their corresponding SE. The asymmetry was also statistically checked by using Egger’s test. The analyses were performed using STATA version 14.1 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Study selection

A total of 553 publications were retrieved after duplicates had been removed. After reading the titles and abstracts 481 studies were excluded. We excluded 50 studies for the following reasons: n-3 PUFAs were combined with other micro- or macronutrients (n = 12) [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38], n-3 PUFA intake was increased through food sources (n = 10) [15, 23, 39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46], the dose of n-3 PUFAs was unclear (n = 2) [36, 47], the appetite questionnaire was invalid or ambiguous (n = 1) [48], the participants were children (n = 7) [49,50,51,52,53,54,55], appetite was measured by other outcomes such as weight and hormone changes (n = 16) [7, 37, 56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69], or the study was not a control trial (n = 2) [70, 71]. Finally, 15 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (Fig. 1) [47, 52, 64, 72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of study screening

Full size image

Study and participants’ characteristics

Characteristics of the 15 included trials are shown in Table 1. 872 participants for n-3 PUFA supplementation and 632 for placebo in our systematic review. The sample size varied from 20 to 421 with an age range from 18 to 90 years. All included CT studies were published between 2003 to 2021. Three studies were conducted in Iran [78, 81, 82], two in Canada [72, 73], two in the USA [64, 77], and two in Israel [47, 52], and the others were conducted in Turkey [76], Denmark [83], Sweden [75], China [74], Brazil [79], and Germany [80]. Of these trials, two studies were cross-over clinical trials and the rest were parallel. The majority of them included both genders, and only two studies were conducted on male adults. The duration of n-3 PUFA supplementation ranged from two to 15 weeks. The dose of n-3 PUFAs ranged from 225 to 4.5 g/d. Six studies reported changes in appetite with the VAS questionnaire [72, 76, 78, 81,82,83], three studies used another valid questionnaire [47, 73, 75], and the rest reported appetite as a side effect of n-3 PUFA supplementation [52, 64, 77, 79, 80].

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review
Full size table

Assessment of risk of bias

Of 15 studies, three were determined to have a low risk of bias [79, 82, 83], and the others were evaluated as having a high risk of bias (Table 2). All of the mentioned studies reported random sequence generation, incomplete outcome data, and selective outcome reporting as low risk of bias. However, a study done by Yehuda et al. did not report these domains. Four trials reported the method of allocation concealment [79, 80, 82, 83]. Therefore, the remaining studies were regarded as high or unclear risk of bias.

Table 2 Study quality and risk of bias assessment of included studies according to the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool
Full size table

Meta-analysis

Eight studies with a total of 636 participants reported data on the effect of n-3 PUFA intake on appetite [47, 72, 75, 76, 78, 81,82,83]. The meta-analysis showed no significant effect of n-3 PUFA intake and total appetite score (SMD = 0.458, 95% CI − 0.327, 1.242, P = 0.25). There was significant heterogeneity among these studies (Q statistic = 140.49, P = 0.0, I2 = 95.0%). The domains of VAS score including hunger, satiety, and desire to eat were reported in 4 studies. The n-3 PUFA supplementation modestly increased the desire to eat (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI 0.116, 2.029, P = 0.02), and the heterogeneity among these studies was significant (Q statistic = 32.21, P < 0.001, I2 = 91.0%). However, the changes in hunger (SMD = 1.007, 95% CI − 0.139, 2.153, P = 0.08) and satiety (SMD = 0.983, 95% CI − 0.597, 2.564, P = 0.22) were not significant. A significant heterogeneity was observed for both hunger (I2 = 93.7%) and satiety (I2 = 96.4%). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the health status of the studies’ participants [47, 72, 75, 76, 81,82,83,84], the dose of n-3 PUFA intervention [72, 75, 76, 81,82,83,84] and studies’ risk of [47, 72, 75, 76, 81,82,83,84]. However, no significant effect on appetite was observed in any subgroup (Table 3).

Table 3 Meta-analysis showing the effects of n-3 PUFA supplementation on appetite in overall analysis as well subgroup analysis (all analyses were conducted using a random effect model)
Full size table

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

In the sensitivity analysis, none of the included studies significantly influenced the pooled effects. The final result of the sensitivity analysis was shown in Table 4. Visual inspection of the funnel plot (Fig. 2) and Egger’s test (slope = 0.067; CI − 3.82–3.95, intercept value = 0.442) showed no significant publication bias.

Table 4 Result of sensitivity analysis
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Funnel plots (with pseudo 95% CI) depicting the effect sizes (difference in means) versus their standard errors (SEs) for controlled trials that assessed the effect of n-3 PUFA supplementation on appetite

Full size image

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that n-3 PUFAs fatty acid supplementation had no significant effect on overall appetite. However, it modestly increases the desire to eat in adults. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review and meta-analysis has been published in this regard.

Previous meta-analyses have investigated the relationship between n-3 PUFA intake as supplements or in the context of foods. Furthermore, some studies assessed body weight, appetite hormones, or their gene expressions in humans as markers for appetite. A review by Behroz et al. showed that polyunsaturated fats, such as n-3 and n-6, have a similar effect on increasing energy expenditure, but they differ in how they regulate weight and appetite [85]. A meta-analysis of fifty-two trials illustrated that more than 2000 mg n-3 PUFA intake for more than 10 weeks significantly increased plasma adiponectin levels, but had no significant effect on circulating leptin levels [86]. In a meta-analysis of 22 studies, it is also revealed that omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid PUFA supplementation in patients with cancer significantly increases body weight and plasma total ω-3 fatty acids [87]. However, a meta-analysis by Satogami et al. showed that patients with eating disorders had higher levels of n-3 PUFAs in peripheral blood tissues than in controls [88]. In contrast, a recent review on the relationship between dietary fatty acids and appetite reported that an increase in n-3 PUFAs led to higher levels of plasma appetite-suppressing hormones and satiety sensation [85]. However, our study did not find any evidence for this effect.

In our study, n-3 PUFAs fatty acid supplementation significantly increases the desire to eat in adults. However, in a study using sunflower and flaxseed oil as a high-fat diet, PUFA did not find a statistically significant effect on the desire to eat among normal-weight females [10]. The small number of studies included in the meta-analysis might have influenced the effect we observed.

Appetite is controlled via multiple physiologic processes. The mechanism by which PUFAs might change the appetite has not yet been completely explicated. However, several mechanisms were proposed for n-3 PUFA’s effects on appetite. Intracellular long-chain fatty acids of the hypothalamus may increase by n-3 PUFA intake which results in initiating satiety signals and regulating appetite [89]. Also, n-3 PUFAs activate free fatty acid receptor 4, which results in increased intracellular calcium concentration that leads to the secretion of hormones like NPY, which can decrease appetite. Some studies also found that n-3 PUFA supplements stimulate the release of bile acid and cholecystokinin which reduce the appetite [82]. However, not all individuals need to reduce their appetite. For example, patients with cancer might have poor appetite due to cytokine inhibition of neuropeptide Y. On the other hand, supplementation with n-3 PUFAs can decrease the production of interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 cytokines, then may combat the loss of appetite in these patients [90]. Therefore, n-3 PUFAs may play a role in regulating total energy intake, managing both over and under-intake [7, 87].

The current study has several limitations that should be considered. First, the included studies were conducted on participants with different conditions like healthy adults, patients with cancer, and obesity and had different intervention periods. Furthermore, a limited number of studies assessed appetite by using subjective tools. Also, none of the 8 studies in our meta-analysis evaluated the daily omega-3 intake of participants via foods. Therefore, supplementation with n-3 PUFAs may meet daily requirement intake (DRI) and the individual may not have consumed more than DRI. Also, in the included studies the dose of n-3 PUFAs for intervention ranged from 225 to 4.5 g/d. Based on the risk of bias assessment, most of the included studies were judged to be “unclear” regarding their risk of bias. Moreover, only one study belonged to the high-risk group in the subgroup analysis of risk of bias, which might limit the power of subgroup analyses in meta-analyses. Therefore, the results should be treated with caution. Finally, we did not perform the search in Cochrane, so a small number of articles may not have been included in the search results, but we compensated for this by extensive searching in other databases and referencing the included articles.

Conclusion

The findings of the present systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the n-3 PUFA supplementation has no significant effect on appetite; however, it might increase the desire to eat. Regarding the different effects of n-3 PUFAs in healthy and unhealthy subjects with different diseases, more trials that investigate these different outcomes are needed.

Availability of data and materials

The data underlying this article was provided in the Supplementary Table 2.

References

  1. Schwingshackl L, et al. A scoping review of current guidelines on dietary fat and fat quality. Ann Nutr Metab. 2021;77(2):65–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Elagizi A, et al. An update on omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and cardiovascular health. Nutrients. 2021;13(1):204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fritsch J, et al. Low-fat, high-fiber diet reduces markers of inflammation and dysbiosis and improves quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(6):1189-1199. e30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mozafarinia M, et al. Association between dietary fat and fat subtypes with the risk of breast cancer in an Iranian population: a case-control study. Lipids Health Dis. 2021;20(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun L, et al. Differential effects of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats on satiety and gut hormone responses in healthy subjects. Foods. 2019;8(12):634.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siriwardhana N, Kalupahana NS, Moustaid-Moussa N. Health benefits of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2012;65:211–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harden CJ, et al. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation had no effect on body weight but reduced energy intake in overweight and obese women. Nutr Res. 2014;34(1):17–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Behrouz V, Yari Z. A review on differential effects of dietary fatty acids on weight, appetite and energy expenditure. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(8):2235–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van den Akker K, Schyns G, Jansen A. Learned overeating: applying principles of Pavlovian conditioning to explain and treat overeating. Curr Addict Rep. 2018;5(2):223–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Graybeal AJ, Shah M, Willis JL. Manipulation of fatty acid composition in a high-fat meal does not result in differential alterations in appetite or food intake in normal weight females: a single-blind randomized crossover study. Appetite. 2021;160:105085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Strik CM, et al. No evidence of differential effects of SFA, MUFA or PUFA on post-ingestive satiety and energy intake: a randomised trial of fatty acid saturation. Nutr J. 2010;9(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lawton CL, et al. The degree of saturation of fatty acids influences post-ingestive satiety. Br J Nutr. 2000;83(5):473–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin X, et al. N-3 polyunsaterated fatty acids improve quality of life and survival, but not body weight in cancer cachexia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Nutr Res. 2022;107:165–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Poppitt S, et al. Fatty acid chain length, postprandial satiety and food intake in lean men. Physiol Behav. 2010;101(1):161–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stevenson JL, Clevenger HC, Cooper JA. Hunger and satiety responses to high-fat meals of varying fatty acid composition in women with obesity. Obesity. 2015;23(10):1980–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Monnard CR, Dulloo AG. Polyunsaturated fatty acids as modulators of fat mass and lean mass in human body composition regulation and cardiometabolic health. Obes Rev. 2021;22:e13197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Golub N, et al. Greasing the wheels of managing overweight and obesity with omega-3 fatty acids. Med Hypotheses. 2011;77(6):1114–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baillie R, et al. Coordinate induction of peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase and UCP-3 by dietary fish oil: a mechanism for decreased body fat deposition. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1999;60(5–6):351–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pérez-Matute P, et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid actions on adiposity and insulin resistance in control and high-fat-fed rats: role of apoptosis, adiponectin and tumour necrosis factor-α. Br J Nutr. 2007;97(2):389–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rossi AS, et al. Dietary fish oil positively regulates plasma leptin and adiponectin levels in sucrose-fed, insulin-resistant rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;289(2):R486–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kozimor A, Chang H, Cooper JA. Effects of dietary fatty acid composition from a high fat meal on satiety. Appetite. 2013;69:39–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Prater MC, et al. Hunger and satiety responses to diets enriched with cottonseed oil vs. olive oil. Physiol Behav. 2023;259:114041.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Polley KR, et al. Appetite responses to high-fat diets rich in mono-unsaturated versus poly-unsaturated fats. Appetite. 2019;134:172–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgins JP, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Hoboken: Wiley; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Amiot M, Riva C, Vinet A. Effects of dietary polyphenols on metabolic syndrome features in humans: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2016;17(7):573–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lorzadeh E, et al. The effect of hesperidin supplementation on inflammatory markers in human adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Chem Biol Interact. 2019;307:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mantovani G, et al. A phase II study with antioxidants, both in the diet and supplemented, pharmaconutritional support, progestagen, and anti-cyclooxygenase-2 showing efficacy and safety in patients with cancer-related anorexia/cachexia and oxidative stress. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15(5):1030–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kapoor N, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial to study the impact of a nutrition-sensitive intervention on adult women with cancer cachexia undergoing palliative care in India. Integr Cancer Ther. 2017;16(1):74–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gómez-Candela C, Horrisberger A, Bermejo L. Efficacy evaluation of an oral powder supplement enriched with eicosapentaenoic acid in cancer patients. Nutr Hosp. 2011;26(6):1385–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. JM GA, et al. Adherence and tolerance as key in brake on weight loss in cancer patients with nutritional risk after intervention with a high calorie nutritional and specific hyperproteic supplement. Nutr Hospit. 2017;34(3):524–31.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mantovani G, et al. Randomized phase III clinical trial of five different arms of treatment in 332 patients with cancer cachexia. Oncologist. 2010;15(2):200–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Calder PC, et al. Targeted medical nutrition for cachexia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized, controlled trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9(1):28–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Barber M, et al. The effect of an oral nutritional supplement enriched with fish oil on weight-loss in patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999;81(1):80–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Akita H, et al. The utility of nutritional supportive care with an eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)-enriched nutrition agent during pre-operative chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: prospective randomized control study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019;33:148–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mantovani G, et al. Cancer-related anorexia/cachexia syndrome and oxidative stress: an innovative approach beyond current treatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13(10):1651–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sánchez-Lara K, et al. Effects of an oral nutritional supplement containing eicosapentaenoic acid on nutritional and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: randomised trial. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(6):1017–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ordman AB. Pilot study for an age-and gender-based nutrient signaling system for weight control. Age. 2008;30:201–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Van der Meij B, et al. Oral nutritional supplements containing n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids affect quality of life and functional status in lung cancer patients during multimodality treatment: an RCT. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(3):399–404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Probst A, et al. Short-term effect of macronutrient composition and glycemic index of a yoghurt breakfast on satiety and mood in healthy young men. Complement Med Res. 2012;19(5):247–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mathias JR, et al. Relation of endometriosis and neuromuscular disease of the gastrointestinal tract: new insights. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(1):81–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gholami Z, Akhlaghi M. The effect of flaxseed on physical and mental fatigue in children and adolescents with overweight/obesity: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2021;126(1):151–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cohen L, et al. Evaluation of the influence of whole and defatted flaxseed on satiety, glucose, and leptin levels of women in the late postoperative stage of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23:157–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Harden CJ, et al. Evaluation of the salivary proteome as a surrogate tissue for systems biology approaches to understanding appetite. J Proteomics. 2012;75(10):2916–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kratz M, et al. Dietary n-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids and energy balance in overweight or moderately obese men and women: a randomized controlled trial. Nutr Metab. 2009;6(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stevenson JL, Paton CM, Cooper JA. Hunger and satiety responses to high-fat meals after a high-polyunsaturated fat diet: a randomized trial. Nutrition. 2017;41:14–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tuccinardi D, et al. Mechanisms underlying the cardiometabolic protective effect of walnut consumption in obese people: a cross-over, randomized, double-blind, controlled inpatient physiology study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(9):2086–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yehuda S, Rabinovitz S, Mostofsky DI. Mixture of essential fatty acids lowers test anxiety. Nutr Neurosci. 2005;8(4):265–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mankad D, et al. A randomized, placebo controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids in the treatment of young children with autism. Mol Autism. 2015;6:1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fristad MA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of individual family psychoeducational psychotherapy and omega-3 fatty acids in youth with subsyndromal bipolar disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2015;25(10):764–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zaid ZA, et al. Fish oil supplementation is beneficial on caloric intake, appetite and mid upper arm muscle circumference in children with leukemia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2012;21(4):502–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. López-Alarcón M, et al. The effect of docosahexaenoic acid on the loss of appetite in pediatric patients with pneumonia. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2006;44(1):5–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Vakhapova V, et al. Safety of phosphatidylserine containing omega-3 fatty acids in non-demented elderly: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial followed by an open-label extension. BMC Neurol. 2011;11(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. McNamara RK, et al. Detection and treatment of long-chain omega-3 fatty acid deficiency in adolescents with SSRI-resistant major depressive disorder. PharmaNutrition. 2014;2(2):38–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Daak AA, et al. Effect of omega-3 (n− 3) fatty acid supplementation in patients with sickle cell anemia: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(1):37–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Sigh S, et al. Effectiveness of a locally produced, fish-based food product on weight gain among Cambodian children in the treatment of acute malnutrition: a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2018;10(7):909.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Oliveira JM, et al. Effects of a low dose of fish oil on inflammatory markers of brazilian HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy: a randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrients. 2015;7(8):6520–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. De Natale C, et al. Effects of baked products enriched with n-3 fatty acids, folates, β-glucans, and tocopherol in patients with mild mixed hyperlipidemia. J Am Coll Nutr. 2012;31(5):311–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Freedman S, et al. Increased fat absorption from enteral formula through an in-line digestive cartridge in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;65(1):97–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Reis RS, et al. Poor infant inhibitory control predicts food fussiness in childhood–a possible protective role of n-3 PUFAs for vulnerable children. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2015;97:21–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Rahemi M, Alizadeh M. The association of energy intake and expenditure, macronutrients, glycemic index and load, and general characteristics with postprandial peptide YY 3–36 serum levels. Crescent J Med Biol Sci. 2018;5(2):107–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Barber MD, Fearon KC. Tolerance and incorporation of a high-dose eicosapentaenoic acid diester emulsion by patients with pancreatic cancer cachexia. Lipids. 2001;36(4):347–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Hellerstein MK, et al. Effects of dietary n-3 fatty acid supplementation in men with weight loss associated with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome: relation to indices of cytokine production. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1996;11(3):258–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Pu S, et al. Interactions between dietary oil treatments and genetic variants modulate fatty acid ethanolamides in plasma and body weight composition. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(6):1012–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Berge K, et al. Krill oil supplementation lowers serum triglycerides without increasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in adults with borderline high or high triglyceride levels. Nutr Res. 2014;34(2):126–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Narverud I, et al. Lack of effects of a single high-fat meal enriched with vegetable n-3 or a combination of vegetable and marine n-3 fatty acids on intestinal peptide release and Adipokines in healthy female subjects. Front Nutr. 2016;3:38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Burns CP, et al. Phase II study of high-dose fish oil capsules for patients with cancer-related cachexia: a cancer and leukemia group B study. Cancer. 2004;101(2):370–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Emsley R, et al. Safety of the omega-3 fatty acid, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in psychiatric patients: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 2008;161(3):284–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Burton-Freeman B. Sex and cognitive dietary restraint influence cholecystokinin release and satiety in response to preloads varying in fatty acid composition and content. J Nutr. 2005;135(6):1407–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Al-Helli A, et al. Effects of fluoxetine, omega 3, or their combination on serum leptin in Iraqi obese subjects. Int J Pharmaceut Sci Rev Res. 2015;35(1):90–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Cerchietti LC, Navigante AH, Castro MA. Effects of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic n-3 fatty acids from fish oil and preferential Cox-2 inhibition on systemic syndromes in patients with advanced lung cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2007;59(1):14–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Parra D, et al. A diet rich in long chain omega-3 fatty acids modulates satiety in overweight and obese volunteers during weight loss. Appetite. 2008;51(3):676–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Bruera E, et al. Effect of fish oil on appetite and other symptoms in patients with advanced cancer and anorexia/cachexia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutr Clin Pract. 2003;18(6):524–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Jatoi A, et al. An eicosapentaenoic acid supplement versus megestrol acetate versus both for patients with cancer-associated wasting: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group and National Cancer Institute of Canada collaborative effort. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(12):2469–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Liu Y, et al. A randomized pilot study of atractylenolide I on gastric cancer cachexia patients. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2008;5(3):337–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Faxén Irving G, et al. Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation effects on weight and appetite in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: the omega-3 Alzheimer’s disease study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(1):11–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Kanat O, et al. Comparison of three different treatment modalities in the management of cancer cachexia. Tumori J. 2013;99(2):229–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Miller ER III, et al. The effects of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on biomarkers of kidney injury in adults with diabetes: results of the GO-FISH trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(6):1462–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Payahoo L, et al. Effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on serum leptin levels, appetite sensations, and intake of energy and macronutrients in obese people: a randomized clinical trial. J Diet Suppl. 2018;15(5):596–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Mocellin MC, et al. Fish oil effects on quality of life, body weight and free fat mass change in gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a triple blind, randomized clinical trial. J Funct Foods. 2017;31:113–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Werner K, et al. Dietary supplementation with n-3-fatty acids in patients with pancreatic cancer and cachexia: marine phospholipids versus fish oil-a randomized controlled double-blind trial. Lipids Health Dis. 2017;16(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Safaeiyan A, et al. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on appetite, energy and macronutrient intake and body weight in obese adults: a randomized clinical trial. Prog Nutr. 2018;20:203–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Moradi S, et al. The effect of short-term omega-3 fatty acids supplementation on appetite in healthy men: a randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial. Nutr Clin Métab. 2022;36(1):46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Damsbo-Svendsen S, Rønsholdt MD, Lauritzen L. Fish oil-supplementation increases appetite in healthy adults. A randomized controlled cross-over trial. Appetite. 2013;66:62–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Payahoo L, et al. Effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on serum leptin levels, appetite sensations, and intake of energy and macronutrients in obese people: a randomized clinical trial. J Diet Suppl. 2018;15(5):596–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Behrouz V, Yari Z. A review on differential effects of dietary fatty acids on weight, appetite and energy expenditure. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(8):2235–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Sepidarkish M, et al. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation on adipokines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(27):7561–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Wang Y, et al. Does omega-3 PUFA-enriched oral nutritional intervention benefit cancer patients receiving chemo (radio) therapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(18):3081–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Satogami K, et al. Relationship between polyunsaturated fatty acid and eating disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2019;142:11–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Chari M, Lam CK, Lam TK. Hypothalamic fatty acid sensing in the normal and disease states. 2011.

  90. Donohoe CL, Ryan AM, Reynolds JV. Cancer cachexia: mechanisms and clinical implications. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2011;2011:60143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Food Hygiene and Safety, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

    Bahareh Sasanfar & Amin Salehi-Abarghouei

  2. Yazd Cardiovascular Research Center, Non-Communicable Diseases Research Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

    Amin Salehi-Abarghouei

  3. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, P O Box 8915173160, Yazd, Iran

    Bahareh Sasanfar & Amin Salehi-Abarghouei

  4. Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Bahareh Sasanfar & Fatemeh Toorang

  5. Student Research Committee, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

    Bahareh Sasanfar

  6. Departments of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Fatemeh Toorang

Authors
  1. Bahareh Sasanfar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatemeh Toorang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amin Salehi-Abarghouei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AMA conceived the study; all authors contributed to the design of the study; BS and FT selected studies and extracted studies; BS selected the items and refined them into concepts; BS wrote the draft manuscript; AMA revised the manuscript; all authors edited the manuscript; and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Salehi-Abarghouei.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The search strategy used to search different databases.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Dose of DHA for intervention (studies used for Meta-analysis).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sasanfar, B., Toorang, F. & Salehi-Abarghouei, A. Effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on appetite: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Syst Rev 13, 44 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02430-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02430-y

Keywords

Systematic Reviews

ISSN: 2046-4053