Skip to main content

Table 2 Study quality and risk of bias assessment of included studies according to the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool

From: Effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on appetite: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

Fist author (year)

Random Sequence Generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of participants and personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment

Incomplete outcome data

Selective outcome reporting

Overall qualitya

Moradi (2021) [82]

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

Safaeiyan (2018) [81]

L

U

L

L

L

L

U

Mocellin (2017) [79]

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

Payahoo (2017) [78]

L

U

L

L

L

L

U

Werner (2017) [80]

L

L

L

U

L

L

U

Berge (2014) [64]

L

U

L

U

L

L

U

Damsbo-Svendsen (2013) [83]

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

Kanat (2013) [76]

U

U

U

U

L

L

U

Miller (2013) [77]

L

U

L

L

L

L

U

Vakhapova (2011) [52]

L

U

L

U

L

L

U

Irving (2009) [75]

L

U

U

U

L

L

U

Liu (2007) [74]

L

H

H

H

L

L

H

Yehuda (2005) [47]

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

Jatoi (2004) [73]

L

U

L

U

L

L

U

Bruera (2003) [72]

U

U

L

U

L

L

U

  1. U unclear risk of bias, L low risk of bias, H high risk of bias
  2. aLow quality: all criteria met; unknown quality: one criterion not met (i.e., high risk of bias for one domain or one criteria unclear); Poor quality: two or more criteria listed as high or unclear risk of bias