Skip to main content

Women’s experiences with yoga after a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative meta-synthesis—part I



Qualitative research on women’s experiences participating in yoga after a cancer diagnosis is growing; systematic synthesis and integration of results are necessary to facilitate the transfer and implementation of knowledge among researchers and end-users. Thus, the purpose of this meta-synthesis was to: (1) integrate findings from qualitative studies, (2) compare and contrast findings to elucidate patterns or contradictions in conclusions, and (3) develop an overarching interpretation of women’s experiences participating in yoga after a cancer diagnosis.


Using meta-study methodology, six electronic databases were searched using a sensitive search strategy in November 2020, a supplemental scan of reference lists was conducted in August 2021, and the database search was replicated in October 2021. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-texts to determine eligibility.


The searches yielded 6804 citations after de-duplication. Data from 24 articles meeting the eligibility criteria were extracted, and the results, methods, and theoretical approach(es) were analyzed. The analysis revealed that there was a predominant focus on two focal points in the primary articles: (1) women’s well-being and quality of life (QoL; part I) and (2) intervention preferences (part II). Five overarching categories emerged related to well-being and QoL: (1) yoga can support improvements in multiple dimensions of QoL in women diagnosed with cancer, (2) women diagnosed with cancer experience an interaction between QoL dimensions, (3) elements of yoga that support improvements in QoL dimensions, (4) breathwork and meditation are integral elements of yoga, and (5) yoga practice may support lifestyle behavior change. The articles reviewed had notable limitations related to: (1) reporting about instructor(s), content of the intervention, and environmental characteristics of the setting, (2) identifying and incorporating optimal features in the intervention design, (3) incorporating theory and real-world considerations into the study procedures, and (4) including positive and negative conceptualizations of QoL as an interconnected and multidimensional concept.


Moving forward, it remains critical to identify the ideal structure and content of yoga programs for promoting well-being and QoL among women diagnosed with cancer, as well as to explore barriers and facilitators to sustainable program implementation.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42021229253.

Peer Review reports


Globally, over eight million women are diagnosed with cancer each year [1], exerting tremendous physical, emotional, and financial strain on individuals, families, communities, and health systems [2]. The overall survival rate for cancer has improved in high-income countries due to accessible early detection, improved treatment, and better survivorship care. Similar to other high-income countries [3], the 5-year overall survival rate for women in Canada is 65% [4]. However, many who survive the disease report short- and long-term adverse effects that may be visible (e.g., scarring, deterioration of muscle mass and strength, reduced mobility [5, 6]) or non-visible (e.g., hot flashes, nausea, depression, anxiety, fear of recurrence, negative body image, cognitive dysfunction [7,8,9]. Indeed, due to symptoms and adverse treatment effects, women diagnosed with cancer have qualitatively reported reductions in their quality of life (QoL) and well-being, including feeling lost, uncertain, and angry about their situation and future [10, 11], as well as incapable of participating in their everyday lives with family, friends, and at work [7, 12]. Evidence suggests that QoL and well-being may be protective factors for health, reducing the risk of physical illness and promoting longevity among women diagnosed with cancer [13,14,15,16]; therefore, it is necessary to identify strategies to help women diagnosed with cancer self-manage unavoidable symptoms and treatment effects and ameliorate their QoL and well-being.

Definitions of QoL are diverse and can encompass a range of dimensions including physical (e.g., outcomes related to one’s ability to perform basic and instrumental physical activities related to daily living, leisure, and occupations), psychological (e.g., outcomes related to one’s thoughts, feelings, and self-perceptions), emotional (e.g., outcomes related to one’s emotional experiences and ability to manage their emotions), cognitive (e.g., outcomes related to mental processes involved in attention, language, perception, learning, memory, understanding, awareness, reasoning, and judgment), and social (e.g., outcomes related to one’s appraisal of their social relationships, how others react to them, and how they interact with social institutions and community) [17, 18]. In the oncology literature, QoL can be understood as a multi-dimensional concept that “refers to patients’ appraisal of and satisfaction with their current level of functioning compared to what they perceive to be possible or ideal” [19]. Previous research lends support to the view that greater well-being is associated with greater QoL and that QoL and well-being are separate concepts that can and should be fostered. Well-being refers to life evaluation (i.e., people’s thoughts about the quality or goodness of their lives), hedonic well-being (i.e., everyday feelings or moods as captured by both positive and negative adjectives), and eudemonic well-being (i.e., judgments about the meaning and purpose of life) [20, 21]. In this sense, well-being assessment carries unique information about a person’s status and enables development fundamental to QoL (and vice versa). Thus, the issue of maintaining both QoL and well-being in women diagnosed with cancer has become a key societal aspiration. Given the variable and expansive conceptualizations of QoL and well-being, the literature reviewed herein is discussed using a comprehensive lens and focuses on QoL as a global construct that encompasses well-being as a state of positive physical, psychological, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning that contributes to QoL.

Evidence has emerged that yoga can ameliorate QoL in women diagnosed with cancer [22,23,24,25]. Yoga is a form of complementary and alternative medicine [26] practiced for approximately 4000 years [27]. Although yoga originally evolved as a spiritual practice, its contemporary practice often features physical postures (asanas), breathing techniques (pranayama), and meditation (dhyana) in North America, Europe, and Oceania [28]. Among women diagnosed with cancer, several systematic reviews [22,23,24,25] and meta-analyses [29,30,31,32] have summarized the results of studies exploring yoga’s positive effects on outcomes such as health-related QoL, depression, anxiety, fatigue, and sleep disturbances. Notably, women diagnosed with cancer have also reported that yoga may help with self-management of symptoms and treatment effects by improving their capacity to cope with these [33,34,35] and reducing adverse physical effects (e.g., pain, numbness [36, 37]). While research on the underlying psychosocial mechanisms that may explain these positive effects is underdeveloped in the oncology field, research in the fields of body image and eating disorder suggest that the focus on moving, stretching, and balancing through a series of poses, awareness of breath, and cultivating the connection between mind and body may address both physical and psychological concerns. Specifically, the physical postures in yoga can be physically challenging or gentle, allowing participants to experience empowerment, strength, and/or relaxation, potentially facilitating greater connection to oneself with renewed attention on the body in a gentler, more compassionate, and positive manner [38,39,40]. Breathwork can provide a foundation for the calming of the mind through observation, control, or imagery [38,39,40]. Meditation can help participants meet their present-moment experience with openness, acceptance, and non-judgment [38,39,40]. However, it remains unclear whether these underlying mechanisms proposed to support QoL and well-being among other clinical and non-clinical populations translate to women diagnosed with cancer. Therefore, it is necessary to understand if and how physical postures, breathing, and meditation support QoL among women diagnosed with cancer.

Qualitative methods (e.g., interviews, focus groups) are optimal to gather knowledge on the benefits of yoga for women diagnosed with cancer and provide insight into how and why yoga is beneficial. Qualitative studies offer a consideration of the contextual information when observing and interpreting participants’ explanations and meanings of a phenomenon (i.e., a thick description [41]). In addition, qualitative studies attempt to document the complexity and multiplicity of individuals’ experiences [42]. Given that primary qualitative studies are rarely used on their own to contribute to practical knowledge [43] and that decision-making ought to be based on all the evidence available (i.e., quantitative and qualitative), methods to synthesize evidence from single qualitative studies have been developed to facilitate the transfer and implementation of knowledge emerging from qualitative studies. For example, qualitative evidence syntheses have been used to understand participants’ experiences, both comprehensively due to the qualitative approach and broadly due to the integration of studies from different contexts and participants, on various topics (e.g., fear of cancer in the general population [44]; experiences of adult children of parents with mental illnesses [45]). Despite a rise in the number of primary qualitative studies on women’s experiences participating in yoga after a cancer diagnosis, an analysis, synthesis, and interpretation of the collective findings is lacking.

Synthesizing results from qualitative studies relating to yoga for women diagnosed with cancer is central to understanding results more broadly and addressing important limitations of quantitative syntheses. Thus, a meta-study meta-synthesis using standardized, rigorous methods was conducted to synthesize the literature and address specific research questions about yoga for women diagnosed with cancer. The objectives of this meta-synthesis were to: (1) integrate findings from qualitative studies, (2) compare and contrast findings to elucidate patterns or contradictions in conclusions, and (3) develop an overarching interpretation of women’s experiences participating in yoga after a cancer diagnosis. Due to the extensive volume of data in the primary articles with two main focal points, it was necessary to present the findings in two distinct manuscripts to provide comprehensive and detailed insights for each outcome. The focal points naturally emerged from the in-depth analysis of the results/findings of the primary articles included in the meta-synthesis and were not set a priori. The current paper reports on findings focused on women’s well-being and QoL; it is part I. Part II reports on participants’ evaluations of yoga programs and interventions [46].Footnote 1

Materials and methods

The protocol for this review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42021229253) and was published [47]. To complete this meta-study meta-synthesis, six distinct overlapping steps outlined by Paterson et al. [43] were undertaken (as described below). Reporting follows the enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ [48]) guidelines in lieu of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines as initially planned.

Step 1: Formulating the research questions

Before conducting the literature search, two specific research questions were established: (1) What are the experiences of women who have participated in yoga after a cancer diagnosis? and (2) What elements of yoga contribute to participants’ positive or negative experiences?

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were set a priori and were broad to capture a breadth of experiences to better understand different responses to yoga. To be included, articles must have: (1) been primary studies conducted with womenFootnote 2 ≥ 18 years diagnosed with cancer, regardless of type of cancer, disease stage, and timing (e.g., at diagnosis, during treatment, post-treatment, or during palliative care), (2) used qualitative methods to collect data (e.g., interviews, focus groups, observations, journaling, open-ended survey questions), (3) reported on participants’ experiences engaging in yoga of any type and dosage (frequency, length, duration), and (4) comprised original research published in English language in a peer-reviewed journal. No restrictions were placed on the year of publication or study design (i.e., observational, quasi-experimental, experimental).

Exclusion criteria

Mixed-methods studies in which qualitative findings were not presented were excluded, as were gray literature (e.g., conference abstracts/posters/proceedings, unpublished theses/dissertations, websites, other unregulated sources), books, opinion pieces, and reviews. Moreover, studies with a sample consisting of > 50% men were excluded. This decision was made to ensure that the sampling method did not introduce bias in the analysis and interpretation of the entire corpus of data published [49, 50] and has been used in other health-related reviews focused on women’s experiences [51,52,53].

Step 2: Selection and appraisal of the primary research

Step 2a: Systematically search and identify relevant articles

Articles were retrieved by searching six electronic databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. With the help of a university librarian, a sensitive search strategy was developed by drawing on Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and keywords used in published reviews (e.g., [54]). The chosen MeSH terms and keywords covered the population (i.e., women diagnosed with cancer) and terminology associated with yoga (e.g., yoga, mindfulness, physical postures, breathing exercises, meditation). To support the breadth of the search, the search strategy did not include MeSH terms and keywords covering data collection methods. The search strategy was pilot-tested and finalized in MEDLINE (see Additional file 1: Table S1) before being translated for use in the five other databases. To ensure the search strategy was compatible with the other databases, it was adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the varying syntax, indexing terms, and search functionalities of the databases while maintaining the core concepts and terms. An initial database search for articles was completed in November 2020, and the results were exported into Covidence, a systematic review online platform. A supplemental search of the reference lists of relevant articles retrieved during the electronic database search (i.e., reviews and included studies) was conducted in August 2021 to ensure all relevant articles were identified. The database search was replicated in October 2021 to retrieve citations published during the previous 11 months. A supplemental search of reviews and included studies was not conducted after the replication search due to the recency of the previous supplemental search. Covidence was used for the automatic removal of duplicates and to store, organize, and manage citations.

Step 2b: Study selection

After the removal of duplicate records, the titles and abstracts of the remaining citations were independently reviewed in a single step by two authors (JP and SS) using broad screening criteria (i.e., citations were not excluded if they did not explicitly state using qualitative methods or the gender/sex breakdown of the sample). This was followed by a full-text review of retained citations against the eligibility criteria; each full-text was independently reviewed by JP and SS. During both steps, the third author (JB) made the final decision when disagreements arose to avoid a hierarchy between screeners. Cohen’s kappa was calculated to measure inter-coder agreement at both screening steps and can be interpreted as follows: 0–0.20 = none, 0.21–0.39 = minimal, 0.40–0.59 = weak, 0.60–0.79 = moderate, 0.80–0.90 = strong, > 0.90 = excellent agreement [55].

Step 2c: Data extraction

The following data were extracted using a template housed on Covidence: (1) study information (i.e., authors, country of data collection, year of publication), (2) study characteristics (i.e., study design, sampling methods, sample size, methodology, data collection methods, analysis methods), (3) sample characteristics (i.e., age, percent women, type of cancer(s), disease stage, timing), (4) reported yoga background and practice characteristics (i.e., dosage [frequency, length, duration], location, style of yoga, social setting, mode of delivery), (5) conceptual/theoretical approaches, and (6) qualitative findings. If the information presented in the primary article was unclear or missing, the corresponding authors were contacted via email to obtain clarification or missing information (for a maximum of three attempts). To ensure completeness and accuracy in extraction, after JP and SS independently extracted data from all included articles, validation checks were conducted, and JP and SS met to discuss any differences before proceeding to critical appraisal and analysis.

Step 2d: Quality assessment

Following the relativist perspective outlined by Sparkes and Smith [56], JP and SS independently appraised the trustworthiness, theoretical considerations, and practical considerations of each study using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) 32-item checklist [57]. The checklist was used to assess the quality of included articles based on the inclusion of information pertaining to the research team and reflexivity, study design, and analysis and findings. Article quality was not an exclusion criterion; instead, findings were used to furnish the meta-method analysis and provide insight into the elements of qualitative research that may not be commonly reported in this area of study [58].

Step 3: Meta-data analysis

For the meta-data analysis, a thematic synthesis approach [58] was carried out by JP and SS. First, JP and SS independently and inductively coded the extracted data that were presented in the “Results/Findings” section of articles line-by-line without any restriction to a prior framework; this was done using concise descriptions that reflected the language used in participants’ quotes or primary authors’ interpretations. When appropriate, the results/findings of the primary articles were coded into existing codes, and new codes were created when necessary. Second, JP and SS met to review the descriptive codes and act as “critical friends” to reflect and explore alternative interpretations and explanations [56], with JB acting as an additional “critical friend” as required to help refine codes. Once codes were agreed upon, JP, SS, and JB sought to create analytical sub-themes. Specifically, the descriptive codes were inductively grouped together based on whether they represented a larger concept or idea related to an aspect of women’s lived experiences. These sub-themes were then grouped together into main themes and categories reflecting broader concepts in the literature.

Step 4: Meta-method analysis

For the meta-method analysis, data pertaining to the methods used were compared within and across articles [43]. The goal was to determine the frequency of use and identify potential patterns of use. Intervention and program characteristics were also compared within and across studies and are presented briefly in this manuscript for context, with detailed results presented in part II.

Step 5: Meta-theory analysis

For the meta-theory analysis [43], data pertaining to theory were examined to identify paradigms or ontological approaches that have informed the authors’ theory selection. Potential limitations, strengths, or ambiguities that may influence the use of theory and interpretation of findings pertaining to women’s QoL and well-being after participating in yoga following a cancer diagnosis, and what may have contributed to their experiences, were summarized herein.

Step 6: Meta-synthesis

By selecting, critically appraising, summarizing, and combining qualitative findings, new interpretations were formed to create an overarching narrative of women’s experiences participating in yoga after a cancer diagnosis, pertaining to part I and II. Also, collating data across qualitative studies enabled conclusions pertaining to: (1) the various methods that have been used to collect and analyze data and (2) potential gaps in knowledge that may be a result of methodological choices in the primary studies.


Search results

The database searches identified 12,115 references; 5237 references were identified as duplicates. Using Covidence, 6878 titles and abstracts were reviewed, and 74 full-texts were deemed potentially relevant (Cohen’s kappa = 0.83). These 74 and an additional two full-texts identified during the manual search were screened, of which 24 met the eligibility criteria; the remaining 52 were excluded for the following reasons: did not look at women’s experiences participating in yoga after cancer diagnosis (n = 33), did not present qualitative findings (n = 10), full-text was not available (n = 6), not a primary study (n = 2), and duplicate (n = 1). Cohen’s kappa at the full-text screening stage was 0.90. The PRISMA diagram of this process is provided in Fig. 1. The characteristics of articles included in the meta-synthesis are presented in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA diagram of meta-synthesis of women’s experiences participating in yoga after a cancer diagnosis

Table 1 Characteristics of articles included in the meta-synthesis (n = 24)

Quality assessment

Domain one (research team and reflexivity practices) was the least reported domain; in this domain, the most reported item was who conducted the interview/focus groups (n = 10; 55.6%), and no articles reported on interviewer/facilitator gender and biases or participant knowledge of interviewer/facilitator. Domain two (study design) varied in the level of reporting; in this domain, the most reported items were sample size (n = 24; 100%) and sampling procedures (n = 24; 100%), and the use of field notes was the least reported item (n = 2; 11%). Domain three (analysis and findings) reporting was often high; in this domain, the most reported item was consistency between findings and conclusions (n = 23; 95.8%), and participant checking was the least reported item (n = 1; 4.2%). See Fig. 2 for an overview of the current reporting practices as per the COREQ checklist.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Quality assessment of articles included in meta-synthesis (n = 24) using the COREQ Checklist

Meta-methods results

Study information and characteristics

The 24 articles were published between 2008 and 2021. Of the 22 (91.7%) articles that reported on the country where data were collected, seven (29.2%) were conducted in Canada, 11 (45.8%) in the USA, one (4.2%) in the UK, one (4.2%) in the Netherlands, one (4.2%) in Sweden, and one (4.2%) in Australia. For parsimony, study designs were classified into one of the following three categories using the information provided in the articles: (1) quasi-experimental (i.e., delivered an intervention but did not have a comparison group and/or did not randomize participants), (2) experimental (i.e., delivered an intervention, had a comparison group, and randomized participants), or (3) observational (i.e., did not deliver an intervention, natural observation without any attempt to create change). Where explanations of study designs were unclear, a reasonable level of inference was used to identify the most likely study design used. Seventeen (70.8%) articles were quasi-experimental studies, four (16.7%) were experimental studies, and two (8.4%) were observational studies. Also, one (4.2%) article aggregated data from a quasi-experimental feasibility trial and an experimental pilot randomized controlled trial.

Sample characteristics

In total, 490 participants were included across the 24 articles, with sample sizes ranging from three to 74 (M = 20.4, SD = 16.4). The average age of participants ranged from 26.5 to 66.5 years. All articles specified when participants were recruited; six (25.0%) post-diagnosis (without specification of participants’ treatment status), one (4.2%) post-surgery (without specification of participants’ treatment status), six (25.0%) on-treatment, eight (33.3%) post-treatment, two (8.3%) either on- or post-treatment, and one (4.2%) receiving palliative care. Twenty-two (91.7%) articles reported on type(s) of cancer: 11 (45.8%) mixed diagnoses, 10 (41.7%) breast cancer, and one (4.2%) lung cancer. Thirteen (54.2%) articles reported on cancer stage: eight (33.3%) focused on stages 0 to 3, four (16.7%) on stages 0 to 4, and one (4.2%) on stage 4. Cancer stage was not applicable in one (4.2%) article as it included women with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Yoga intervention and program characteristics

Of the 24 articles reviewed, 23 (95.8%) articles reported results pertaining to a yoga intervention or program. Specifically, 18 (75.0%) articles described one single yoga intervention being investigated, one (4.2%) described three separate yoga interventions being investigated within a single study (i.e., participants received one of three interventions), three (12.5%) described different structured community yoga programs investigated within three single studies, and two (8.3%) described an identical intervention investigated with two single studies (i.e., two articles were published based on the same dataset). Therefore, the final number of yoga interventions or programs described is 25, which was used as the denominator below.

Twenty-four (96.0%) intervention descriptions included mode of delivery: one (4.0%) intervention or program was delivered via synchronous videoconferencing technology, one (4.0%) via a single asynchronously pre-recorded video online, one (4.0%) via asynchronously pre-recorded videos on a website, 12 (48.0%) in-person, and nine (36.0%) in-person with materials to support supplemental self-guided practices at home. For studies that included supplemental self-guided practices, four (16%) prescribed dosage (i.e., frequency, length, duration), and five (20%) did not prescribe dosage for at-home practices. Not including interventions or programs that provided supplemental self-guided practices at home, the social setting of 23 (92.0%) interventions or programs (92.0%) was described, wherein 18 (72.0%) were delivered in a group (i.e., multiple participants with one interactive instructor), three (12.0%) were one-on-one (i.e., one participant with one interactive instructor), and two (8%) were self-guided only (i.e., one participant, no interactive instructor). Details about the location the interventions or programs were delivered (not including supplemental self-guided practices at home) were provided for 22 (88.0%) interventions or programs: 14 (56.0%) were delivered in the community, one (4.0%) at participants’ homes, three (12.0%) online, three (12.0%) at a university, and one (4.0%) at a hospital. Interventions and programs lasted 1 to 12 weeks (M = 7.3) and lasted 20 to 120 min (M = 69.1), ranging from one to seven times per week (M = 2.5), yielding a total of one to 56 sessions (M = 15.1). The type of yoga delivered was described for 24 (96.0%) interventions or programs: four (16.0%) delivered Iyengar, one (4.0%) Iyengar-inspired, four (16.0%) Hatha, one (4.0%) Hatha and Vinyasa, one (4.0%) Hatha and Healing, one (4.0%) Integral, one (4.0%) Kripaula, five (20.0%) restorative, one (4.0%) Satyananda, one (4.0%) mindfulness-based, one (4.0%) gentle, and one (4.0%) focused primarily on pranayama.

Epistemology, methodology, and methods

Philosophical viewpoints were stated in two (8.3%) of the 24 articles and consisted of a pragmatist epistemology in one (4.2%) prospective follow-up study using a one-group, pre-post, sequential-explanatory mixed-methods design and an interpretivist and feminist epistemology in one (4.2%) quasi-experimental study. Of the 10 (41.7%) articles that specified the qualitative methodology used, two (8.3%) cited interpretative phenomenological analysis, two (8.3%) descriptive, one (4.2%) instrumental case study, one (4.2%) mixed-methods, one (4.2%) neurophenomenology, one (4.2%) interpretive description methodology, one (4.2%) community-based participatory research principles, and one (4.2%) a combination of symbolic interactionism, ethnography, mindful inquiry, and phenomenology. Across the 24 articles, 11 (45.8%) used interviews, four (16.7%) focus groups, six (25%) open-ended survey questions, and three (12.5%) a combination of the aforementioned methods as well as program evaluation forms, journal reflections, and weekly phone calls to collect data. Data analysis techniques included thematic (n = 6; 25%), content (n = 3; 12.5%), grounded theory (n = 2; 8.3%), interpretative phenomenological (n = 2; 8.3%), constant comparison (n = 1; 4.2%), ethnographic content (n = 1; 4.2%), summative content (n = 1; 4.2%), categorical aggregation/iterative (n = 1; 4.2%), iterative-thematic (n = 1; 4.2%), inductive reasoning (n = 1; 4.2%), reflective thematic (n = 1; 4.2%), and a combination of symbolic interactionism, ethnographic, mindful inquiry, and phenomenology (n = 1; 4.2%).

Meta-theory results

Five (20.8%) of the 24 articles reported using theory or models. One used the social cognitive theory to inform their yoga intervention, situating yoga as a means of a simultaneous source of social support and physical activity. Another employed a multi-theory/model approach using the effort-related attention model, the circumplex model of affect, the dual-mode theory of affective responses to exercise, and the neurovisceral integration model to explore affective and physiological responses of yoga; these were used to frame the study, inform data collection, and guide interpretation of the data after inductive thematic analysis. A third stated that their data analysis was informed by feminist theory, though did not explain why or how the theory was used in the quasi-experimental study. A fourth used the power as knowing participation in change to frame the study, inform data collection, and guide deductive qualitative description analysis of data. A fifth used the biopsychosocial-spiritual model to guide the interpretation of the data after inductive thematic analysis.

Meta-data results

Across the 24 articles, a total of 210 individual codes were generated representing distinct statements. Codes were aggregated into 15 main themes (sub-headings marked in bold italics) with 48 sub-themes (marked in italics in text). The main themes were further coalesced into five overarching categories (sub-headings marked in bold) to organize dominant ideas. Participants viewed yoga as positively impacting their well-being. Moreover, participants’ experiences provide insight into the interconnected and dynamic nature of multiple QoL dimensions and offer understanding of the contextual considerations that may influence QoL dimensions. In addition, participants’ accounts indicate that breathwork and meditation are crucial components of yoga for facilitating QoL. Finally, a small selection of articles provided a starting point for exploring the potential of yoga prompting lifestyle behavior change. Due to the differences in purposes and study designs across articles, not all articles are represented in each category, theme, and/or sub-theme. Below, the categories are presented, along with a description of each theme and sub-theme pertaining to part I. An overview of the themes is presented in Table 2 and supporting data are presented in Table 3.

Table 2 Summary of categories, themes, and subthemes identified in the articles included in the meta-synthesis (n = 24) related to the changes in dimensions of quality of life
Table 3 Supporting quotations identified in the articles included in the meta-synthesis (n = 24) related to changes in dimensions of quality of life

Category 1: Yoga can support improvements in multiple dimensions of QoL in women diagnosed with cancer

Main theme 1: Regain the ability to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living

In 22 (91.7%) articles, participants described how yoga positively impacted their physical functioning, which in turn improved overall physical well-being. Participants indicated improved physiological functions of body systems, explaining that they felt that yoga contributed to lowered blood pressure [34], improved circulation [67], improved respiration [33, 65, 67], expanded lung capacity [74], decreased shortness of breath [68], reduced constipation [68], and improved arm morbidity for women experiencing lymphedema [37]. Participants also discussed improved physical fitness and body alignment as yoga helped them feel more physically fit. Indeed, participants described improvements in flexibility [33, 34, 60, 61, 66, 67, 70, 74, 75, 77], mobility [33, 70], balance [33, 66, 77], stamina [35, 61, 67], strength [33, 61, 63, 67, 70, 72, 75, 77], fitness [63, 66, 77], weight loss and toning [76], and posture [37, 70, 77] and stated that it counteracted physical deterioration [34] and helped them move their muscles [74]. In terms of improved execution of tasks or activities, participants described how yoga improved their ability to carry out day-to-day activities [70, 73, 74, 77], engage in other forms of physical activity [35, 61], and return to normal more quickly [65]. Improvements in fatigue and energy were reported; participants felt that yoga reduced fatigue [65, 67, 68], increased energy [33, 35, 61, 66, 67, 70, 71, 73, 74], increased feelings of restfulness [61], improved sleep [33,34,35, 61, 67, 69, 72], decreased insomnia [68], and increased evening sleepiness post-yoga [71] and morning/afternoon wakefulness post-yoga [71]. Also, participants reported feeling physical invigoration [63], rejuvenation [74], and improved vitality [69] post-yoga. Finally, with respect to reductions in pain, numbness, and cancer-related symptoms, participants were specific about how yoga alleviated adverse physical disease and treatment effects; namely, it helped through pain relief [33,34,35,36,37, 60, 66,67,68,69, 72, 77], reduced numbness [37], reduced stiffness [65, 72], reduced achiness [61, 65], reduced joint pain [61], physical tension relief [63], and eased physical symptoms [77]. More generally, participants described how yoga helped in their recovery from cancer treatment/cancer-related symptoms [33, 34, 64, 65, 67, 70, 75]. However, in one (4.2%) article, participants expressed experiencing pain and discomfort during yoga and found the sequences tiring [67].

Main theme 2: Let go of negative emotions and thoughts while embracing inner tranquility

In 16 (66.7%) articles, participants described how yoga positively impacted aspects of their emotional functioning and well-being. Increased emotional regulation was a prominent sub-theme; participants felt that yoga allowed them to feel and release negative emotions resulting from the cancer experience [33], increased their emotional stability [61], and improved their ability to manage stressful situations [33, 34, 61, 67, 69, 70, 72, 75], their worries [33, 69], anxiety/anxieties [33, 69], and intrusive thoughts [69]. Also, participants reported that yoga helped decrease stress [35, 61, 66, 69, 77] and feelings of distress [61] and encouraged them to let go of tension, stress, or the need to control a situation [33]. Moreover, in terms of increased experiences of positive feelings, emotions, and mood, participants reported increased feelings of relaxation [33,34,35, 59, 62, 65,66,67, 70, 71], hope [34], calm [33, 35, 61, 66, 69,70,71, 77], happiness [33, 67], peacefulness [61, 62, 72, 77], optimism [34], pleasure [34], tranquility [34, 61], positive affect [71], and benevolence [70]. Participants in two (8.3%) articles spoke more generally about how yoga helped improve their mood [67, 73]. However, one participant in one (4.2%) article felt inadequate during yoga [67] and one participant in a different (4.2%) article found it stressful to practice at-home [59].

Main theme 3: Connect the mind and body to gain a deeper self-appreciation and understanding of oneself

In 16 (66.7%) articles, participants described personal development of positive psychological attributes through their participation in yoga that contributed positively to their overall psychological functioning and well-being. Regarding increased mental strength and resilience, participants described increased mental strength [33, 77], resilience [33], and mental stability [33], as well as feeling more mentally charged/balanced [33]. Participants discussed an increased connection to, and awareness of the body, behaviors, and capabilities; participants described a greater connection with the body [37], a mind–body connection [33, 34], feelings of interconnectedness [63], and a restored sense of balance between both sides of their bodies [37]. In addition, participants reported enhanced awareness of body signals [33], physical capabilities [33], bodily awareness [37, 62, 72], understanding of their body [37], awareness of unconscious behaviors [70], and self-confidence to engage in activities of daily living [33]. In terms of improved coping, participants described an improved capacity to cope in general [63, 66] and with specific issues (i.e., cancer and treatments [33, 34]; cancer-related outcomes [35]). Furthermore, there was an increase in positive beliefs about the self, as participants described increased self-efficacy [35, 63], self-confidence [33, 35, 67, 70, 74], self-worth [67], sense of self [70], and belief in the importance of self-care [62, 63]. Also, participants reported that yoga helped bolster their self-image [67], self-esteem [33], and (re-)connection to their spiritual self [34, 61], and spiritual strength [61]. Another sub-theme was increased feelings of acceptance, reduced inner critiques, and freeing oneself from negative thoughts, feelings, and beliefs as participants reported greater bodily acceptance [37], feeling kinder to oneself [33, 69], self-acceptance [34], acceptance of “what is” [72], and cancer-related limitations [33, 37], as well as reduced self-criticism [70], rumination of aches and pains [35, 70, 74], negative body image [70], anxiety symptoms [61, 68], and depressive symptoms [67, 70]. Moreover, as for increased understanding of self and increased feelings of empowerment and self-advocation of needs, participants reported that yoga helped them feel more empowered [34, 63, 66], facilitated a process of “turning inwards” to reflect on their needs [33, 62], and helped them become vigilant about their personal needs and encouraged taking steps toward addressing them [70], including being more assertive about their needs [37] and empowered to stand-up for their needs [33]. Participants reported feeling more in control of their health/illness [66, 67] and engaged in self-healing [66] with yoga. Finally, participants reported an improved outlook and mindset based on having a more positive mindset [34, 67, 70, 74], an improved outlook [68], a better frame of mind [61], feeling more open [74], increased beliefs about survival probability [33], motivation to engage with life [65, 70], and feeling accomplished post-yoga [67].

Main theme 4: Quiet the mental chatter to focus on the present

In seven (29.2%) articles, participants described how yoga positively impacted their cognitive functioning and well-being. With respect to increased focus, participants reported that yoga increased their mental focus [33, 63, 70, 71], concentration [33], and ability to think clearly [36, 74]. Participants discussed increased attention; they felt their attention shifted away from dissociative attention (e.g., focusing on non-exercise-related stimuli and diverting attention away from internal sensations and present exercise experience) to associative attention (e.g., focusing on internal feedback including breathing rate and muscle soreness) during yoga [71]. Also, participants reported increased attention to their breath [71] and mental awareness [70]. Regarding increased feelings of mindfulness, participants reported that their mind stopped wandering during yoga [71] and that they experienced a quieting [63] and calming of the mind [33]. However, some participants in one (4.2%) article did not feel they experienced any improvements in their cognitive functioning [65], and some participants in a different (4.2%) article reported difficulties maintaining focus during yoga [71].

Main theme 5: Find contact and connection for emotional support and companionship

In 12 (50.0%) articles, participants described how group-based, in-person yoga positively impacted their social functioning and well-being. In terms of increased sociability, participants felt that yoga facilitated interaction with group members outside of yoga sessions [72], improved relationships with others (e.g., partners, friends, co-workers) [35, 70], and led them to feel more sociable [35, 70]. Also, participants reported feeling connected to others [61] because group-based yoga (especially when practiced with other cancer survivors) helped them feel recognized [33], understood [33, 60, 66, 69], emotionally supported [33], not alone in their emotions [62], less intimidated to share [77], open to sharing [70], accepted [60, 66, 69, 77], like they belong [70], and less socially isolated [60, 66, 69]. In addition, participants believed that group-based yoga contributed to a sense of co-regulation [69] and camaraderie [65, 74].

Category 2: Women diagnosed with cancer experience an interaction between QoL dimensions

Main theme 1: Greater control over emotions coupled with more positive emotions supports functioning of body systems, positive self-evaluations and coping methods, and connection with others

Participants provided insight into the potential pathways and connections between the different QoL dimensions and how improvements in one dimension might facilitate well-being in another. In six (25.0%) articles, participants’ improvements in emotional well-being supported psychological, social, and physical well-being. Participants felt that increased emotional regulation in the form of stress reduction helped them develop a more positive mindset [35, 66] and improved their sleep [35, 70]. Experiences of positive feelings, emotions, and mood were reported to help increase self-confidence and sociability [70], improve relationships [67, 69, 70], help to connect to their body and spirituality [34], help lower blood pressure, direct attention away from pain, and rebound from cancer treatment [34]. Still, being unable to control one’s thoughts during yoga did give rise to negative feelings, emotions, and mood for some participants in one (4.2%) article [69].

Main theme 2: Improved fitness supports positive self-beliefs, sociability, and emotional regulation

In nine (37.5%) articles, participants reported that improvements in their physical well-being and functioning supported improvements in their psychological, social, and emotional well-being and functioning. Indeed, participants felt that the physical improvements fostered positive beliefs about the self, including increased self-confidence [37, 60, 70, 76, 77], self-efficacy [37], and treatment-related acceptance [76]. Also, participants reported that physical improvements helped them feel better about themselves [34], decreased perceived stress and anxiety symptoms [74], and contributed to improved body image [36, 76]. Similarly, participants described that physical improvements enabled more attention and awareness of their bodies, behaviors, and capabilities, resulting in increased feelings of capability/competence [37, 75, 77], feelings of comfort in their bodies [77], and mind–body connection [34]. Additionally, participants reported less fear to engage in activities [37], feeling better able to challenge preconceived beliefs about their personal limitations [77], and felt more sociable [70] as a result of physical improvements. Finally, participants reported that improvements in mobility helped them to be more open and relaxed in a safe environment [74].

Category 3: Elements of yoga that support improvements in QoL dimensions

Main theme 1: Being in a group of others who share common experiences

In seven (29.2%) articles, which were all focused on group-based yoga, participants described the presence of others who share common experiences as important for facilitating improvements in well-being. Their presence allowed for sharing their experiences and offering encouragement which supported feelings of acceptance [33, 60, 66, 69, 75], understanding [33, 60, 66, 69, 75], belonging [70], and openness [70]. In addition, seeing others cope with cancer helped participants feel like they could survive their own diagnosis [33] and increased self-awareness of physical abilities [74].

Main theme 2: Detailed and tailored instruction

In two (8.3%) articles wherein the intervention was delivered in-person, participants reported that the instructors’ communication style (i.e., language and approach to explaining physical postures) facilitated physical and psychological well-being. Participants felt their improved balance and flexibility were a result of specific and detailed instruction [66]. Moreover, individual-level instruction and the props used in the Iyengar style of yoga were considered to be instrumental in allowing participants to perform postures properly and experience greater self-efficacy [63].

Main theme 3: Physical postures, turning inwards, and breathwork

In five (20.8%) articles, participants reported specific elements of yoga that contributed to their cognitive, psychological, and emotional well-being. Participants identified the first supine position (i.e., Shavasana or “corpse” pose) of yoga as contributing to a mental shift (i.e., more focused, attentive, and mindful) because it was associated with sleep states; one participant compared this pose to a “power nap” [71]. Participants were able to relax during the supine meditation and felt re-energized and more awake immediately following this pose [71]. While focusing on the movement and alignment of the body as well as the breath during more strenuous standing sequences, participants felt able to focus and quiet their minds because these sequences required concentration and thus helped them ignore other stimuli [71]. Participants felt that breathwork, relaxation, and working through various postures contributed to feeling mentally balanced/charged [33], increased their coping skills [33], and provided them with stress-management skills [33, 34, 69]. In addition, participants felt that centering the self during yoga led to feelings of optimism, pleasure, and tranquility [75].

Category 4: Breathwork and meditation are integral elements of yoga

Main theme 1: Separate strategies that can be used in daily life

Although breathwork and meditation can be delivered as standalone interventions, according to yogic philosophy they are integral components of yoga [27]. Of the 24 articles, 15 (62.5%) explicitly mentioned the impact of breathwork and/or meditation on participants’ experiences. Participants felt breathwork required focus, mental effort, and attention [60, 66]. Participants thought of breathwork and meditation as tools or strategies to use beyond yoga sessions because they are easy [60, 66], unobtrusive [60, 66], require little preparation [60, 66], and can be practiced daily [33, 65]. Participants also linked breathwork and meditation to improvements in emotional, psychological, physical, and cognitive well-being.

Main theme 2: Facilitation of inner tranquility, connection to internal states, awareness of body, and decreased rumination on the external

Breathwork and meditation supported emotional well-being by increasing positive affect [71]; by facilitating a sense of calm [68, 69], relaxation [62], and peacefulness [68]; and by encouraging a “letting go” stance [34]. In addition, participants felt breathwork and meditation helped them feel more relaxed [66, 77], less stressed [60, 66, 67], and more in control of their reactions in negative situations (e.g., chemotherapy treatment [65]). For psychological well-being, participants felt that breathwork and meditation increased their bodily awareness [60, 66] and helped them manage their anxiety symptoms [67]. For physical well-being, participants reported that breathwork and meditation contributed to pain relief [37], reduced tension [34], increased energy [34], improved sleep [60, 66, 75], reduced coughing [74], and improved lung capacity [74]. Finally, for cognitive well-being, breathwork and meditation helped participants calm their thoughts [67], provided a distraction for maladaptive thoughts [66, 68], and increased focus [71, 77], concentration [71], and awareness of moment-to-moment experiences [69, 71, 75].

Category 5: Yoga practice may support lifestyle behavior change

Of the 24 articles, five (20.8%) reported on participants’ perspectives around lifestyle behaviors, including yoga. Participants reported intentions and motivation to continue with yoga post-intervention to sustain benefits [60, 64, 74]. In one article (4.2%), participants expressed an understanding of the need for consistent practice to improve/sustain physical improvements and that they felt hopeful but unsure about their abilities to do so [74]. In addition, participants reported becoming more mindful of their eating behaviors and greater engagement in other physical activities because of yoga. In one article (4.2%), participants attributed behavioral changes pertaining to diet and physical activity to a change in mindset or appreciation for the health benefits of these behaviors; however, not all participants in this article reported these changes [67]. In another article (4.2%), participants described increased physical activity and mindful eating practices stemming from their participation in yoga, which they believed were responsible for their weight loss [35].


Findings from multiple articles presenting qualitative findings can be synthesized to provide an in-depth understanding of the experiences of diverse participants across settings. A systematic overview of all relevant qualitative articles focused on women’s experiences participating in yoga after a cancer diagnosis is lacking as previous reviews have not focused on qualitative research (e.g., [22,23,24,25]). Therefore, the aim of this qualitative meta-synthesis was to examine women’s perspectives on the impact of yoga on their QoL and well-being following a cancer diagnosis. Thematic synthesis was used to identify the main, recurrent themes of multiple qualitative articles across settings and subgroups of women with different cancer diagnoses, prognoses, and challenges. The synthesis of 24 articles provided convincing evidence that yoga yields a range of perceived benefits categorized into five broad QoL dimensions that interact: physical, psychological, emotional, cognitive, and social. The themes and associated quotes across articles showed common experiences and confirm that yoga helps women manage the adverse side effects of cancer and its treatments, rediscover strength and physical abilities, embrace a positive outlook and relationship with themselves, develop strategies for coping with stressors, foster social connections and support, and become more attentive and mindful. The resulting classification of themes in the current meta-study meta-synthesis corroborates current conceptualizations of QoL as a dynamic, multilevel, and complex concept reflecting subjective experience, wherein the multiple dimensions interact [78, 79]. As explored in category 2 of the results, knowing that experiences in one domain (e.g., physical well-being) can influence another (e.g., psychological and emotional well-being) based on women’s accounts is important to ensure QoL measures assess multiple dimensions and that analytical approaches used in future studies capture possible interactions.

Yoga is a mind–body practice that can include meditation and breath practices in addition to guidance on leading an ethical lifestyle [27]. Yet, many of the yoga interventions and programs reviewed in the 24 articles focused primarily on strengthening and stretching the body as well as improving fitness through physical postures (i.e., asanas). Findings suggest that interventions and programs promoting turning inwards for self-reflection, meditation, and breathwork can support participants’ physical, psychological, emotional, and cognitive well-being and should therefore be considered when designing future interventions and programs. Based on the findings, another consideration is to offer women opportunities to connect with others who share common experiences and to engage with an instructor capable of offering detailed and tailored instruction, perhaps through in-person, group-based interventions and programs. A meta-study on the topic of social support and physical activity for cancer survivors asserts this conclusion [80], suggesting group-based yoga may enhance women’s yoga experiences and keep them engaged after being diagnosed with cancer.

This review demonstrates a possible connection between practicing yoga and engaging in other health-promoting lifestyle behaviors such as healthy eating and other physical activities. However, only five (20.8%) articles probed this topic, and even then, they did not provide insight into why or how such behaviors may be connected to practicing yoga. Perhaps experiencing improved QoL and well-being may have motivated participants to prioritize health-promoting, self-care behaviors/practices to further support their QoL and well-being. Thus, if yoga can support positive behavior change, it may make it even more meaningful for women, especially for those who would like to improve their health and well-being through multiple or holistic means. Future research should seek to understand the underlying mechanisms that foster QoL and well-being in yoga interventions, as well as the association between practicing yoga and behavior change.

Strengths and limitations of reviewed articles

This review contributes to our understanding of QoL and well-being from the perspective of women practicing yoga after being diagnosed with cancer. Strengths of the included articles were that they: (1) examined the experiences of women with different cancer diagnoses, prognoses, and challenges (although those diagnosed with breast cancer do represent the majority of published work), (2) investigated the different types of yoga, and (3) varied in terms of the social setting, length, dosage, and delivery method of the interventions and programs, as well as presence and delivery of at-home components of the interventions. Although summarizing and analyzing data from multiple, heterogeneous single articles present challenges, it does align more closely with the “real” world and the plethora of yoga classes and programs offered in various communities. It is unlikely that a single yoga intervention or program will be appropriate for all women diagnosed with cancer; therefore, it is necessary to explore women’s opinions on the ideal yoga intervention or program for promoting QoL and well-being to elucidate the most beneficial components. In addition, there was some variation in the qualitative methods used (e.g., semi-structured interviews, focus groups, open-ended surveys); variation in researchers’ lenses helps to provide a more nuanced interpretation of the results. Despite the strengths, there were notable limitations of the primary articles reviewed in this meta-synthesis related to reporting, intervention and program design, study procedures, and conceptualization of QoL.

Limitations of reporting

The majority of the reviewed articles did not reference the use of reporting guidelines (e.g., Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials [81]; Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research [82]), resulting in inconsistent reporting in the primary articles. Relatedly, the authors varied in their descriptions of yoga and research procedures, with some providing very short descriptions. The Checklist Standardising the Reporting of Interventions For Yoga (CLARIFY) guidelines for yoga interventions (i.e., a reporting guideline extension to complement standard reporting guidelines) comprises 21 items across 10 reporting categories [83] and builds on previous recommendations [84]; this can help improve transparency and consistency when reporting yoga interventions or programs. The following section uses the CLARIFY guidelines as a framework for discussing reporting limitations of the primary articles reviewed and can provide direction to researchers and persons seeking to develop yoga interventions and programs.

The instructor

The CLARIFY guidelines call for a detailed description of the person delivering the intervention. The results of this review indicate that women find an instructor’s interacting style (i.e., the manner in which an instructor/facilitator interacts with clients or participants [85]) to be a valuable and integral component of how yoga can facilitate QoL and well-being. Fitness and yoga instructors’ interacting styles can significantly affect participants’ enjoyment and affect during/after sessions [85, 86]. Therefore, the authors would benefit from providing as much detail as possible on the interacting style of the person(s) delivering the yoga sessions, including whether they use visual demonstration, verbal guidance, and/or hands-on assistance. Similarly, as yoga instructors have a responsibility to maintain a safe, inclusive, and welcoming environment for participants, the authors should describe how they ensured their yoga instructors were prepared to offer the intervention by detailing their expertise, experience, personal background, and education/training.


The CLARIFY guidelines call for detailed reporting of the content of the intervention, including what postures, meditation, and breathwork were delivered. Although findings from this review assert the importance of particular postures, breathwork, and meditation, only three (12.5%) articles provided clear descriptions of the physical postures and only two (8.3%) included details about the breathwork and meditation used. There are nearly 100 “common” physical postures that could be incorporated into a yoga class, each with their own purposes; thus, without a description or breakdown of the intervention, it makes it difficult to replicate the intervention and subsequent findings. Therefore, it is necessary for authors to describe in detail the activities/content of the yoga intervention or program, including the type of yoga and the specific elements practiced (e.g., postures/asanas, breathwork/pranayama, meditation, relaxation), with offered alternatives (if any). Similarly, when and how formal independent practice (e.g., at-home) is recommended as part of the intervention or program should be reported, and copies of materials to support such practice should be made available.

Environmental characteristics

Although not a category in the CLARIFY guidelines, the authors describing future yoga interventions or programs should detail the location and layout of the space where the intervention is delivered because environments that have been carefully and effectively arranged may help promote positive experiences. For example, setting a peaceful mood by including elements such as dim lighting, views of nature (e.g., windows in the practice space), high ceilings, and ample practice space can encourage continued practice [86]. In contrast, mirrors in yoga studios have been identified as a source of negative self-perceptions related to one’s physical appearance and capabilities [87, 88]. Having details on the features of the space (e.g., windows, lighting, sound), provision of props (e.g., mats, blocks, straps, bolsters), and arrangement of participants (e.g., circular, side-by-side) would aid those setting out to create an optimal physical environment that supports women’s yoga practice after cancer.

Limitations in intervention and program design

Beyond illustrating the need for accurate and comprehensive reporting of yoga interventions and programs to allow readers to understand exactly what has been developed and evaluated, the reviewed articles raise some important questions on the type and dosage (i.e., intensity, frequency, duration) of yoga and combination of content most effective for women after a cancer diagnosis. While yoga interventions and programs prioritized primarily physical postures, limited reporting and heterogeneity across articles make robust conclusions difficult. Nevertheless, findings from this review, coupled with findings from a recent systematic review of meta-analyses of yoga interventions [89], suggest the need to include more components of traditional yoga (e.g., ethical education, postures, breathing, meditation). Future studies should shift away from the tendency to prioritize the physical element of yoga and include more breathwork and meditation, while also seeking to identify the optimal features of yoga interventions and considering the unique needs and preferences of different groups of people who may participate. Explicit comparison of two or more yoga interventions or programs varying in intensities, frequencies, and durations of postures, breath practices, and meditations should be conducted. It may also be prudent to investigate the potential for self-selecting the intensity, frequency, and duration of yoga practices because research in the domain of physical activity suggests that allowing participants in the general population to self-select physical activity can lead to better psychological/emotional functioning [90]. Finally, including the Essential Properties of Yoga Questionnaire [91] would be a valuable addition to study design and reporting to allow researchers to objectively characterize the 14 key dimensions of yoga interventions and programs (i.e., acceptance/compassion, bandhas, body awareness, breathwork, instructor mention of health benefits, individual attention, meditation and mindfulness, mental and emotional awareness, physicality, active postures, restorative postures, social aspects, spirituality, and yoga philosophy) and thus serve to enhance reliability, transparency, validity, and comparison across studies.

Limitations of study procedures

While 15 main themes were identified from 24 articles reporting qualitative results from different subgroups of women, those who were middle-aged and diagnosed with breast cancer were overrepresented, indicating a need to closely examine other groups (e.g., young adults, elderly, lung cancer) as this may reveal different QoL and well-being experiences related to yoga as well as different contextual considerations. Second, 19 (79.2%) articles did not report making use of any theory or models. It is unclear why more authors have not anchored their studies in theory or conceptual models, but one hypothesis is that the complex nature of yoga (wherein multiple moving parts of interventions including physical postures, instructors, and peers may influence participants’ experiences) is not well-captured in current theories or models. As such, researchers may need to draw on multiple theories and models that align with the goals of their research or develop theories or conceptual models that support the development of yoga interventions and programs. Last, 21 (87.5%) articles reported on participants’ experiences after completing an intervention; consequently, the conceptualization of yoga and QoL are limited to controlled conditions created by researchers. Studies are needed to confirm if this would also be the case among women diagnosed with cancer who practice yoga independent of an intervention. Finally, studies with longer follow-up qualitative assessments are warranted to investigate the long-term effects of yoga and hence determine if short-term improvements in QoL and well-being are sustained over time.

Limitations in conceptualization of QoL

Only four (16.6%) articles reported negative outcomes pertaining to QoL dimensions. While this may occur because of publication bias, this could also be due to bias or oversight in the development of qualitative data collection methods (or true findings); for example, interview questions have a tendency toward eliciting positive feedback. It is important that both positive and negative experiences be assessed and interpreted appropriately in future research. Relatedly, as this synthesis affirms that QoL is multidimensional and dynamic, using flexible data collection methods that allow for exploring change within QoL dimensions and associations between dimensions at various time points (e.g., before, during, and after interventions) would be more in line with the characterization of QoL found in this review. More attention needs to be focused on using diverse qualitative methodologies (e.g., ethnography, narrative discourse, grounded theory) to explore the interconnectedness and multidimensional nature of QoL and well-being after yoga participation. Doing so may help to better understand the processes underlying women’s experiences of their QoL and well-being and thus inform the development of optimal yoga interventions.

Strengths and limitations of meta-synthesis

The main strength of this meta-synthesis is that a comprehensive and systematic approach following recommendations for a meta-study meta-synthesis was used [43]. Developing the search strategy in consultation with an experienced librarian and having multiple authors independently screen, extract, analyze, and interpret findings from retrieved articles are also strengths. Also, this review adopted a broad approach (i.e., cancer and yoga characteristics were not exclusion criteria) so that data from different subgroups of diverse women (e.g., younger and older age groups) taking part in different types of yoga across different settings (e.g., in-person or online, at a community center, yoga studio, or hospital) could be synthesized to capture all available qualitative data on how yoga impacts QoL and well-being. Similarly, an advantage of including all qualitative articles, regardless of the qualitative methods used (e.g., semi-structured interviews, focus groups, open-ended surveys), is that it ensures that conclusions are not influenced by one specific methodological orientation, allowing for more robust conclusions.

Nevertheless, there are notable limitations that should be considered. First, only peer-reviewed published articles were reviewed, presenting the risk of publication bias (whereby articles showing a beneficial impact of yoga may have been more likely to be published). Second, only articles published in the English language were reviewed. Third, although data analysis was conducted by multiple authors, the themes and subthemes developed herein may differ from those developed by other authors. The authors’ professional and personal backgrounds have influenced the results and interpretation of women’s experiences of QoL and well-being in relation to yoga (much like the values, backgrounds, and experiences of the primary authors of the included articles could have influenced their results). Fourth, studies with < 50% men were included in this meta-synthesis. However, all articles did not report whether quotations or interpretations were based on men’s experiences; therefore, it is possible that some codes may have been derived from men’s experiences. Fifth, most articles in the review focused on asana-based yoga with only one focusing on non-asana-based yoga; the presence of physical movement in the asana-based yoga may have an impact on participants’ experiences. Last, some authors provided very short descriptions/explanations of their data (perhaps, in part, due to journal word count limits) in the primary articles, offering limited insights and potentially contributing less to this synthesis than articles with rich descriptions and comprehensive quotations. Accordingly, the quality of this meta-synthesis cannot be any better than the quality of the individual articles it is summarizing.


This review used rigorous methods (i.e., meta-study meta-synthesis) to synthesize qualitative research and highlights that yoga can have a positive influence on various dimensions of QoL among women diagnosed with cancer. It represents a much-needed synthesis of this research as prior reviews have focused on quantitative evidence [e.g., [22, 25]]. From the 24 articles reviewed, five overarching categories were identified: (1) women’s experiences of changes in dimensions of QoL (physical, psychological, emotional, social, cognitive), (2) processes related to changes in QoL, (3) contextual considerations for these changes, (4) the importance of breathwork and meditation for improving QoL, and (5) the potential influence of yoga on lifestyle behavior change. Ultimately, findings help extend our understanding of how yoga impacts women diagnosed with cancer. Based on this review, yoga may promote QoL by helping women experience positive physical and mental changes, become more socially connected and supported, and live meaningfully and mindfully. From a research perspective, this review has the specific advantage of synthesizing heterogeneous qualitative findings, making it easier to understand how and why yoga may support improvements in QoL among women diagnosed with cancer. It also helps generate new hypotheses about intervention/program setting and content, theory, and conceptualizations of QoL; thus, this review allows interested parties to make informed decisions based on all available evidence. In turn, through the process of synthesizing multiple articles, it provides increased confidence that yoga interventions or programs are likely to have significant implications for promoting positive changes in women’s QoL and should therefore feature in future studies and practices seeking to find alternative therapies to promote QoL in this population.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.


  1. In the context of this manuscript, interventions refer to structured interventions designed by researchers and programs refer to community programs or classes.

  2. Female (sex)/woman (gender) was often used interchangeably in the articles; for brevity, woman/women is used in this manuscript.



Quality of Life


Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis


Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research


Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online


Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature


Medical Subject Heading


Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research


Checklist Standardising the Reporting of Interventions for Yoga


International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews


  1. World Health Organization. Global Cancer Observatory 2018 [Available from:

  2. Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, MacIntyre MF, et al. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(4):505–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021.

  4. Canadian Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2021. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abrahams HJ, Gielissen MF, Schmits IC, Verhagen CA, Rovers MM, Knoop H. Risk factors, prevalence, and course of severe fatigue after breast cancer treatment: a meta-analysis involving 12 327 breast cancer survivors. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(6):965–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones JM, Olson K, Catton P, Catton CN, Fleshner NE, Krzyzanowska MK, et al. Cancer-related fatigue and associated disability in post-treatment cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(1):51–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Falk SJ, Dizon DS. Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):916–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holmberg C. No one sees the fear: becoming diseased before becoming ill–being diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(3):175–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lovelace DL, McDaniel LR, Golden D. Long-term effects of breast cancer surgery, treatment, and survivor care. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2019;64(6):713–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sibeoni J, Picard C, Orri M, Labey M, Bousquet G, Verneuil L, et al. Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vardaramatou F, Tsesmeli A, Koukouli S, Rovithis M, Moudatsou M, Stavropoulou A. Exploring women’s experiences after breast cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study. Perioperative Nursing-Quarterly scientific, online official journal of GORNA. 2021;10(2 April-June 2021):193-207.

  12. Tan FSI, Shorey S. Experiences of women with breast cancer while working or returning to work: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2021:1–12.

  13. Cucarella SP, Pérez MAC. Positive psychology in women with breast cancer. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS. 2015:12–21.

  14. Gordon T, Lee LJ, Tchangalova N, Brooks AT. Psychosocial protective interventions associated with a better quality of life and psychological wellbeing for African American/Black female breast cancer survivors: an integrative review. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2021:1–22.

  15. Roh S, Lee Y-S, Hsieh Y-P, Easton SD. Protective factors against depressive symptoms in female American Indian cancer survivors: the role of physical and spiritual well-being and social support. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2021;22(8):2515.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steptoe A, Deaton A, Stone AA. Psychological wellbeing, health and ageing. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):640.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lavdaniti M, Tsitsis N. Definitions and conceptual models of quality of life in cancer patients. Health Sci J. 2015;9(2):1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.

  19. Cella DF. Quality of life: concepts and definition. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994;9(3):186–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Diener E, Lucas R, Helliwell JF, Schimmack U, Helliwell J. Well-being for public policy: Oxford Positive Psychology; 2009.

  21. Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N. Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publication; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baydoun M, Oberoi D, Flynn M, Moran C, McLennan A, Piedalue KL, et al. Effects of yoga-based interventions on cancer-associated cognitive decline: a systematic review. Curr Oncol Rep. 2020;22(10):100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cramer H, Lauche R, Klose P, Lange S, Langhorst J, Dobos GJ. Yoga for improving health-related quality of life, mental health and cancer-related symptoms in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD010802.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma M, Lingam VC, Nahar VK. A systematic review of yoga interventions as integrative treatment in breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142(12):2523–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wanchai A, Armer JM. The effects of yoga on breast-cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review. J Health Res. 2020;34(5):409–18.

    Google Scholar 

  26. National Institutes of Health. 2016 strategic plan: exploring the science of complementary and integrative health. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2016.

  27. Satchidananda SS. The yoga sutras of Patanjali. Buckingham, VA: Integral Yoga Publications; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Yoga 2011 [Available from:

  29. Buffart LM, van Uffelen JGZ, Riphagen II, Brug J, van Mechelen W, Brown WJ, et al. Physical and psychosocial benefits of yoga in cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(559):1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  30. El-Hashimi D, Gorey KM. Yoga-specific enhancement of quality of life among women with breast cancer: systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Evid Based Integr Med. 2019;24:2515690X19828325.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin KY, Hu YT, Chang KJ, Lin HF, Tsauo JY. Effects of yoga on psychological health, quality of life, and physical health of patients with cancer: a meta-analysis. Evid Based Complemen Alternat Med. 2011;2011:659876.

    Google Scholar 

  32. O’Neill M, Samaroo D, Lopez C, Tomlinson G, Santa Mina D, Sabiston C, et al. The effect of yoga interventions on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life for women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Integr Cancer Ther. 2020;19:1534735420959882.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. van Uden-Kraan C, Chinapaw MM, Drossaert CH, Verdonck-de Leeuw I, Buffart L. Cancer patients’ experiences with and perceived outcomes of yoga: results from focus groups. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(7):1861–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carr T, Quinlan E, Robertson S, Duggleby W, Thomas R, Holtslander L. Yoga as palliation in women with advanced cancer: a pilot study. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2016;22(3):111–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Evans S, Seidman L, Sternlieb B, Casillas J, Zeltzer L, Tsao J. Clinical case report: yoga for fatigue in five young adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017;6(1):96–101.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Taylor TR, Barrow J, Makambi K, Sheppard V, Wallington SF, Martin C, et al. A restorative yoga intervention for African-American breast cancer survivors: a pilot study. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018;5(1):62–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomas R, Quinlan E, Kowalski K, Spriggs P, Hamoline R. Beyond the body: insights from an Iyengar yoga program for women with disability after breast cancer. Holist Nurs Pract. 2014;28(6):353–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Neumark-Sztainer D, MacLehose RF, Watts AW, Pacanowski CR, Eisenberg ME. Yoga and body image: findings from a large population-based study of young adults. Body Image. 2018;24:69–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cox AE, Tylka TL. A conceptual model describing mechanisms for how yoga practice may support positive embodiment. Eating Disorders. 2020:1–24.

  40. Cox AE, Ullrich-French S, Cole AN, D’Hondt-Taylor M. The role of state mindfulness during yoga in predicting self-objectification and reasons for exercise. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2016;22:321–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mills AJ, Durepos G, Wiebe E. Encyclopedia of case study research: Sage Publications; 2009.

  42. Crotty M. The foundations of social research. London, United Kingdom: SAGE; 1998.

  43. Paterson BL, Thorne SE, Canam C, Jillings C. Meta-study of qualitative health research: a practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vrinten C, McGregor LM, Heinrich M, von Wagner C, Waller J, Wardle J, et al. What do people fear about cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of cancer fears in the general population. Psychooncology. 2017;26(8):1070–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Murphy G, Peters K, Jackson D, Wilkes L. A qualitative meta-synthesis of adult children of parents with a mental illness. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(23–24):3430–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Price J, Sharma S, Brunet J. Women’s experiences with yoga after a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative meta-synthesis–part II. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2023;51:101752.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Price J, Brunet J. Exploring women’s experiences participating in yoga after a cancer diagnosis: a protocol for a meta-synthesis. Syst Rev. 2022;11(1):166.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. McKenzie JE, Brennan SE, Ryan RE, Thomson HJ, Johnston RV, Thomas J. Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2019:33–65.

  50. Booth A. Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Babakus WS, Thompson JL. Physical activity among South Asian women: a systematic, mixed-methods review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Banks-Wallace J, Conn V. Interventions to promote physical activity among African American women. Public Health Nurs. 2002;19(5):321–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cleland V, Granados A, Crawford D, Winzenberg T, Ball K. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity among socioeconomically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2013;14(3):197–212.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Burke S, Wurz A, Bradshaw A, Saunders S, West MA, Brunet J. Physical activity and quality of life in cancer survivors: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Cancers. 2017;9:53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3):276–82.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sparkes AC, Smith B. Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: criteriology and relativism in action. Psychol Sport Exer. 2009;10(5):491–7.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Addington EL, Sohl SJ, Tooze JA, Danhauer SC. Convenient and Live Movement (CALM) for women undergoing breast cancer treatment: challenges and recommendations for internet-based yoga research. Complement Ther Med. 2018;37:77–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Archer S, Phillips E, Montague J, Bali A, Sowter H. “I’m 100% for it! I’ma convert!”: Women’s experiences of a yoga programme during treatment for gynaecological cancer; an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2015;23(1):55–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Bryan S, Zipp G, Breitkreuz D. The effects of mindfulness meditation and gentle yoga on spiritual well-being in cancer survivors: a pilot study. Altern Ther Health Med. 2021;27(3):32–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Danhauer SC, Tooze JA, Farmer DF, Campbell CR, McQuellon RP, Barrett R, et al. Restorative yoga for women with ovarian or breast cancer: findings from a pilot study. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2008;6(2):47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Duncan M, Leis A, Taylor-Brown J. Impact and outcomes of an Iyengar yoga program in a cancer centre. Curr Oncol. 2008;15(s2):109.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Flanagan JM, Post K, Hill R, Winters LN. Findings from a provider-led, mindfulness-based, Internet-streamed yoga video addressing the psychological outcomes of breast cancer survivors. Holist Nurs Pract. 2021;35(5):281–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Galantino ML, Greene L, Daniels L, Dooley B, Muscatello L, O’Donnell L. Longitudinal impact of yoga on chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment and quality of life in women with early stage breast cancer: a case series. Explore. 2012;8(2):127–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Galantino ML, Greene L, Archetto B, Baumgartner M, Hassall P, Murphy JK, et al. A qualitative exploration of the impact of yoga on breast cancer survivors with aromatase inhibitor-associated arthralgias. Explore. 2012;8(1):40–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Huberty J, Eckert R, Larkey L, Gowin K, Mitchell J, Mesa R. Perceptions of myeloproliferative neoplasm patients participating in an online yoga intervention: a qualitative study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2018;17(4):1150–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Kligler B, Homel P, Harrison LB, Sackett E, Levenson H, Kenney J, et al. Impact of the Urban Zen Initiative on patients’ experience of admission to an inpatient oncology floor: a mixed-methods analysis. J Altern Complement Med. 2011;17(8):729–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Kvillemo P, Bränström R. Experiences of a mindfulness-based stress-reduction intervention among patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(1):24–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Loudon A, Barnett T, Williams A. Yoga, breast cancer-related lymphoedema and well-being: a descriptive report of women’s participation in a clinical trial. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(23–24):4685–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Mackenzie MJ, Carlson LE, Paskevich DM, Ekkekakis P, Wurz AJ, Wytsma K, et al. Associations between attention, affect and cardiac activity in a single yoga session for female cancer survivors: an enactive neurophenomenology-based approach. Conscious Cogn. 2014;27:129–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. McCall M, Thorne S, Ward A, Heneghan C. Yoga in adult cancer: an exploratory, qualitative analysis of the patient experience. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  73. McCall M, McDonald M, Thorne S, Ward A, Heneghan C. Yoga for health-related quality of life in adult cancer: a randomized controlled feasibility study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:816820.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. McDonnell KK, Gallerani DG, Newsome BR, Owens OL, Beer J, Myren-Bennett AR, et al. A prospective pilot study evaluating feasibility and preliminary effects of breathe easier: a mindfulness-based intervention for survivors of lung cancer and their family members (Dyads). Integr Cancer Ther. 2020;19:1534735420969829.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Thomas R, Shaw R. Yoga for women living with breast cancer-related arm morbidity: findings from an exploratory study. Int J Yoga Therap. 2011;21(1):39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Van Puymbroeck M, Schmid A, Shinew K, Hsieh P-C. Influence of Hatha yoga on physical activity constraints, physical fitness, and body image of breast cancer survivors: a pilot study. Int J Yoga Therap. 2011;21(1):49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Van Puymbroeck M, Burk BN, Shinew KJ, Kuhlenschmidt MC, Schmid AA. Perceived health benefits from yoga among breast cancer survivors. Am J Health Promot. 2013;27(5):308–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Ferrans CE, editor Quality of life: conceptual issues. Seminars in Oncology Nursing; 1990.

  79. Bishop M. Quality of life and psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability: preliminary analysis of a conceptual and theoretical synthesis. Rehabil Counsel Bull. 2005;48(4):219–31.

    Google Scholar 

  80. McDonough MH, Beselt LJ, Kronlund LJ, Albinati NK, Daun JT, Trudeau MS, et al. Social support and physical activity for cancer survivors: a qualitative review and meta-study. J Cancer Surviv. 2021;15(5):713–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials. 2010;11(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  82. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Moonaz S, Nault D, Cramer H, Ward L. Releasing CLARIFY: a new guideline for improving yoga research transparency and usefulness. J Complement Altern Med. 2021;27(10):807–9.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sherman KJ. Guidelines for developing yoga interventions for randomized trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:143271.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Puente R, Anshel MH. Exercisers’ perceptions of their fitness instructor’s interacting style, perceived competence, and autonomy as a function of self-determined regulation to exercise, enjoyment, affect, and exercise frequency. Scand J Psychol. 2010;51(1):38–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Cox AE, Brunet J, McMahon AK, Price J. A qualitative study exploring middle-aged women’s experiences with yoga. Journal of Women & Aging. 2021:1–13.

  87. Frayeh AL, Lewis BA. The effect of mirrors on women’s state body image responses to yoga. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2018;35:47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Martin Ginis KA, Jung ME, Gauvin L. To see or not to see: effects of exercising in mirrored environments on sedentary women’s feeling states and self-efficacy. Health Psychol. 2003;22(4):354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Matko K, Bringmann HC, Sedlmeier P. Effects of different components of yoga: a meta-synthesis. OBM Integr Complement Med. 2021;6(3):1.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ekkekakis P, Brand R. Affective responses to and automatic affective valuations of physical activity: fifty years of progress on the seminal question in exercise psychology. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;42:130–7.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Park CL, Elwy AR, Maiya M, Sarkin AJ, Riley KE, Eisen SV, et al. The essential properties of yoga questionnaire (EPYQ): psychometric properties. Int J Yoga Therap. 2018;28(1):23–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


JP and SS were supported by SSHRC graduate scholarships during the preparation of this manuscript, and JB holds a Canada Research Chair Tier II in Physical Activity Promotion for Cancer Prevention and Survivorship. The authors would like to acknowledge Nigèle Langlois for her time and assistance throughout the search strategy development and refinement process.


This research and the APC were funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, grant number 892–2021-1002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



JP conceptualized the study and methods; conducted the search, data analysis, and interpretation; drafted and revised the manuscript. SS aided in the data analysis and interpretation, critically revised the manuscript, and approved the final version. JB contributed to the conceptualization of the study and methods, reviewed the drafts of the manuscript, provided critical feedback, approved the final version, and is both JP’s and SS’s doctoral supervisor.

Authors’ information

Jenson Price, MA, is a PhD candidate in the Human Kinetics Department at the University of Ottawa. Her research focuses on psychosocial supportive care program development and evaluation for clinical populations. She has published theoretical and empirical investigations using quantitative and qualitative methods.

Sitara Sharma, MA, is a PhD student in the School of Human Kinetics at the University of Ottawa. Her research focuses on understanding the link between physical activity and brain health in clinical populations to help guide future supportive care services. She is involved in multiple projects aimed at improving the health and well-being of diverse groups.

Jennifer Brunet, PhD, is a full professor in the School of Human Kinetics at the University of Ottawa. Her research is focused on identifying and understanding determinants of physical activity to better inform interventions to address the health burden related to physical inactivity. In addition, she is working to develop and evaluate evidence-based interventions aimed at increasing physical activity levels and reducing cancer sequalae.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Brunet.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

MEDLINE Search Strategy.

Additional file 2: 

ENTREQ Checklist.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Price, J., Sharma, S. & Brunet, J. Women’s experiences with yoga after a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative meta-synthesis—part I. Syst Rev 12, 176 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: