Skip to main content

A protocol for systematic review of Plantago major L. effectiveness in accelerating wound-healing in animal models

Abstract

Background

Studies have indicated that Plantago major L. (P. major) has therapeutic properties, such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antifungal, immunostimulatory, and tissue regeneration. This plant species is assumed to provide potent tissue repair and healing in treatments of skin wound injuries, but the understanding of its effectiveness is still unclear. The systematic review proposed herein aims to assess effectiveness of P. major for wound healing in animal models.

Methods

We will conduct database searches in BVS, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and CABDirect. Reviewers will independently evaluate titles, abstracts, and full-text articles retrieved from databases to identify potentially eligible studies. Relevant articles will be assessed for risk of bias and quality. The database searches will include analysis of wound healing rate through macroscopic evaluation, photo images, or calculation of the wound area retraction until the wound closure. Relevant data will be compiled for the capability and effectiveness of P. major treatments in accelerating wound healing. Random effects meta-analysis models will be employed to compare among groups based on outcome variables from studies reporting sufficient high-quality data.

Discussion

Results of this systematic review will be presented in a narrative synthesis form. They will provide a summary and clear understanding of the relevant current questions and evidences directly related to P. major effective tissue repair and healing. Outcomes of this systematic review will contribute with important information that could benefit future research efforts and potential applicability in humans.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42019121962

Peer Review reports

Background

Because of their therapeutic effects, medicinal plants are used worldwide to treat many diseases. They are rich sources of phytochemicals with potential therapeutic effect in treatments using direct application of raw material. Moreover, they also play a role for the development of new medicinal drugs. Plantago major L. is one of the most abundant and widely distributed medicinal plant in the world. It is a perennial plant species that belongs to the genus Plantago and the family Plantaginaceae [1]. P. major leaves and seeds are reported to have analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, antifungal, anticancer, and wound healing [2,3,4]. Medicinal benefits of P. major may be related to various bioactive compounds, such as flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, phenolic compounds, iridoid glycosides, fatty acids, polysaccharides, and vitamins [2, 5]. Recent studies have shown successful treatment of cutaneous wounds with certain plant species or natural substances isolated from plants [6,7,8]. P. major has been described to be effective for tissue repair and skin wound healing, but the extent of its effectiveness has not been evaluated.

First reports related to therapeutic uses of this plant species date from the twelfth and thirteenth centuries [9, 10]. Nowadays, several researches using in vivo, in vitro, and ex vivo techniques have demonstrated potential healing activity of ethanol- and water-based extracts from P. major leaves and seeds [11,12,13,14]. To date, a systematic review on therapeutic effectiveness of this plant species on skin wound healing was not identified in the literature. Therefore, the findings of this proposed systematic review will significantly contribute to the current knowledge of the mechanism of action of P. major in the process of cutaneous wound healing.

According to the literature, P. major has various medicinal applications without any serious adverse effects. Besides, this plant species is widely distributed in many countries (11-14). These evidences encourage further search on the effectiveness of P. major on healing processes, as well as transfer of knowledge from research to clinical practice. Thus, the objective of this systematic review is to identify, select, and evaluate high-quality published research on the effectiveness of P. major in the healing process of cutaneous wounds.

Study question

What is the evidence in the literature for the effectiveness of using P. major for wound healing in animal models?

Methods

Protocol and registration

This protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019121962). The bias of the assessed experimental studies will be evaluated by the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLES) [15]. The quality of the studies will be evaluated by the Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies (CAMARADES) [16]. This systematic review will search for primary studies in animal models with cutaneous wounds topically treated with P. major in comparison with the placebo/vehicle control group.

Electronic search methods for study identification

Search will be conducted in 7 electronic bases listed below alongside with their respective strategies: BVS: (“Wound Healing”) OR (Regeneration) AND (“Plantago major” OR “Plantago officinarum”). PubMed: (Wound Healing) OR “Wound Healing”) OR Healing, Wound) OR “Healing, Wound” OR Healings, Wound OR “Healings, Wound”) OR Wound Healings) OR “Wound Healings”) OR (Regeneration) OR Regeneration) OR Regenerations) OR Regenerations) AND (“Plantago major”) OR “Plantago officinarum”). Scopus: (“Wound Healing” OR “Healing, Wound” OR “Healings, Wound” OR “Wound Healings”) OR (TITLE-ABS-KEY (regeneration OR regenerations) AND (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Plantago major” OR “Plantago officinarum”). Web of Science: (“Wound Healing” OR “Healing, Wound” OR “Healings, Wound” OR “Wound Healings”) (Regeneration OR Regenerations) (“Plantago major” OR “Plantago officinarum”). Embase: (“plantago major” OR “plantago major” OR “plantago major”) AND (“wound healing”/exp OR “wound healing”/syn OR “wound healing” OR “regeneration”/ OR “regeneration” OR “regeneration”). CINAHL: (“Wound Healing”) OR “Wound Healing” OR “Healing, Wound” OR “Healings, Wound” OR “Wound Healings” OR (“Regeneration”) OR Regeneration OR Regenerations AND “Plantago major” OR “Plantago major” OR “Plantago officinarum”. CABDirect: (Regeneration OR Regenerations) OR (“Wound Healing” OR “Healing, Wound” OR “Healings, Wound” OR “Wound Healings”) AND (“Plantago major” OR “Plantago officinarum”. Grey literature will not be included in the search.

Procedure for study selection

At first, titles and abstracts will be examined by two reviewers (FCIC and PPA) and then selected according to the criteria for potentially eligible studies. Duplicated studies will be excluded from the search. Possible discrepancies between the two reviewer evaluations will be discussed and resolved or decided by a third member (APD). Subsequently, studies that were identified as eligible will be submitted to a text review performed by two reviewers (TP and JBC). Disagreements among the text reviewers will be resolved by a third member (ARSO-K). The final list of publications to be included in the systematic review will be decided in plenum. The following data will be extracted: title, author, year, journal, study type, wound kind, formulation type, treatment time, method, comparison groups, and outcome (Table 1). Remaining discrepancies will be resolved in agreement with a third author, and then, they will be revised in plenum. Data will be extracted to a Microsoft Office Excel document.

Table 1 Suggested data to be extracted from eligible papers

Statistical Analysis will be performed by HCO, ARSO-K, and MHM on data collected from January 2006 to January 2019.

Criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies

Studies selected for the systematic review must (a) be written in English; (b) use the animal model specifically in rats, mice, and rabbits; (c) include both genders; (d) and focus on acute or chronic cutaneous wound models. Studies must describe (a) the initial and final wound size, (b) the number of animals per group, (c) the time of treatment, (d) the present the concentration, (e) the formulation used in the treatment of the wound, (f) data about the wound-healing rate, (g) and cell markers that can be modulated by the therapeutic treatment, assessed by Morphometric analysis. Details are shown in Table 1. Studies using P. major mixed with another medicinal plant species will be excluded, as well as the ones based on in vitro experimentation.

Intervention

The intervention group must include topical treatment with P. major. Treatment must describe formulation, concentration used, and initial and final size of the wound.

Quality assessment

Studies will be evaluated by two independent reviewers with the quality evaluation instrument CAMARADES, a 10-item checklist in which one point is granted for each question [10]. The analysis of results will use the SYRCLE’s RoB [9] instrument, which consists of 10 “yes,” “no,” or “not clear” questions, indicating low, high, and not clear risk of bias, respectively.

Comparators

Control group submitted to topical treatment with placebo/vehicle must be compared against the group receiving the analyzed intervention.

Outcome

The outcome includes analysis of wound healing rates through macroscopic evaluation, photo images, or calculation of wound retraction area until wound closure.

Data synthesis

The results of this systematic review will be presented in the narrative synthesis form. Data on animal species, wound type, treatment time, and results of interventions will be tabulated in order to support findings of the search. Random effects meta-analysis models will be employed to compare among groups, based on outcome variables. Studies included in the review must disclose sufficient high-quality data. Weighted mean differences among groups with their respective 95% confidence intervals and p values will be presented in forest plots. The presence of heterogeneity will be evaluated by I2 and chi-square statistical analyses. Funnel graphics will be constructed to evaluate publication bias.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first review to date evaluating effectiveness of P. major, a medicinal plant species, in wound treatments. This systematic review will be done solely for the English idiom due to financial constraints since it did not receive financial support. This is a limitation however attenuated by the fact that nowadays the vast majority scientific research is published in English. Results indicating efficacious and accelerated healing process using P. major topic treatment have been described in the literature. Even though efficiencies of this plant species in cutaneous healing process is not yet clear. Healing rates will be evaluated in cutaneous wounds that received P. major topical treatment compared with wounds that received placebo/vehicle treatment. P. major extract concentration, best response, time of use, and cell markers that can be modulated by the treatment are important variables to assess treatment effectiveness. Data on these variables might provide steady information; thus, they will be searched, compiled, and analyzed.

The results of this systematic review may contribute to the transferring of knowledge from P. major scientific research into clinical practice guidelines. Moreover, this systematic review will contribute with important information that could benefit future research efforts and potential applicability in humans.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Abbreviations

BVS:

Virtual Health Library

Cab Direct:

Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International Bioscience International

CAMARADES:

Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis of Animal Data from Experimental Stroke

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Embase:

Excerpta Medica Database

CINAHL:

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature

PROSPERO:

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews

PubMed:

Public/Publisher MEDLINE

Scopus:

SciVerse Scopus

SYRCLE:

Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Research

Web of Science:

Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System

References

  1. 1.

    Nazarizadeh A, Mikaili P, Moloudizargari M, Aghajanshakeri S, Javaherypour S. Therapeutic uses and pharmacological properties of Plantago major L. and its active constituents. J Basic Appl Sci Res. 2013;3(9):212–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Samuelsen AB. The traditional uses, chemical constituents and biological activities of Plantago major L. A review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2000;71(1-2):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00212-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Núñez Guillén ME, da Silva Emim JA, Souccar C, Lapa AJ. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of the aqueous extract of Plantago major L. Int J Pharmacogn. 1997;35(2):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1076/phbi.35.2.99.13288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pieme AA, Kumar GG, Dongmo SS, Moukette MM, Boyoum FF, Ngogang YY, et al. Antiproliferative activity and induction of apoptosis by Annona muricata (Annonaceae) extract on human cancer cells. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;24(14):516. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Adom MB, Taher M, Mutalabisin MF, Amri MS, Abdul Kudos MB, Wan Sulaiman MWA, et al. Chemical constituents and medical benefits of Plantago major. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy. 2017;96:348–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.09.152.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Alaribe FN, Maepa MJ, Mkhumbeni N, Motaung SC. Possible roles of Eucomis autumnalis in bone and cartilage regeneration: A review. Trop J Pharm Res. 2018;17(4):741–9. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v17i4.25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Trajano ETL, da Trajano LA, dos Santos Silva MA, Venter NG, de Porto LC, de Fonseca A, et al. Low-level red laser improves healing of second-degree burn when applied during proliferative phase. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(4):1297–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1729-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Horinouchi CD, Mendes DA, Nolte S, Brito PS, Soley BD, Favero GM, Facundo VA, Santos AR, Cabrini DA, Otuki MF, et al. Anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effects of 3β,6β,16β-Trihydroxylup-20(29)-ene on cutaneous inflammation. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017;4(195):298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.11.035.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fleurentin J, Mazars G, Pelt JM. Additional information on the cultural background of drugs and medicinal plants of Yemen. J Ethnopharmacol. 1983;8:335–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(83)90072-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Roca-Garcia H. Weeds: a link with the past. Arnoldia. 1972;30:23–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Muhammad Zubair, Hilde Nybom, Christina Lindholm, Johanna M. Brandner & Kimmo Rumpunen. Promotion of wound healing by Plantago major L. leaf extracts – ex-vivo experiments confirm experiences from traditional medicine. Natural Product Research: Formerly Natural Product Letters. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2015.1034714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Velasco-Lezama R, Tapia-Aguilar R, Román-Ramos R, Vega-Avila E, Pérez-Gutiérrez MS. Effect of Plantago major on cell proliferation in vitro. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.05.050.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Amini M, Kherad M, Mehrabani D, Azarpira N, Panjehshahin M, Tanideh N. Effect of Plantago major on burn wound healing in rat. J Appl Anim Res. 2010;37:53–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2010.9707093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zubair M, Ekholm A, Nybom H, Renvert S, Widen C, Rumpunen K. Effects of Plantago major L. leaf extracts on oral epithelial cells in a scratch assay. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;141:825–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.03.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen KY, Ma B, Wang YN, Chen CH, Zhao YQ, Zheng JX, et al. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. Chinese J Evidence-Based Med. 2014;14(43). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-43.

  16. 16.

    Macleod MR, O’Collins T, Howells DW, Donnan GA. Pooling of animal experimental data reveals influence of study design and publication bias. Stroke. 2004;35(5):1203–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000125719.25853.20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This study was conceptualized by MHML, PPA, and FCIC for developing the search strategy. TP, FCIC, and PPA completed the search and outlined the protocol. APD, ARSO-K, JCB, and HCO critically appraised the protocol and contributed to its development by revising subsequent versions. MHML, ARSO-K, and HCO will contribute equally to data collection and analysis and interpretation of the review. All authors will read, critically revise, and approve the review in a final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Helena Melo Lima.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Cássia Israel Cardoso, F., Peruzzo Apolinário, P., da Silva Cunha Breder, J. et al. A protocol for systematic review of Plantago major L. effectiveness in accelerating wound-healing in animal models. Syst Rev 8, 337 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1255-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Plantaginaceae
  • Systematic review
  • Wound healing
  • Wounds and injuries