Skip to main content

A scoping review protocol on in vivo human plastic exposure and health impacts



Global plastic production has increased exponentially since the 1960s, with more than 6300 million metric tons of plastic waste generated to date. Studies have found a range of human health outcomes associated with exposure to plastic chemicals. However, only a fraction of plastic chemicals used have been studied in vivo, and then often in animals, for acute toxicological effects. With many questions still unanswered about how long-term exposure to plastic impacts human health, there is an urgent need to map human in vivo research conducted to date, casting a broad net by searching terms for a comprehensive suite of plastic chemical exposures and the widest range of health domains.


This protocol describes a scoping review that will follow the recommended framework outlined in the 2017 Guidance for the Conduct of Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Reviews, to be reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. A literature search of primary clinical studies in English from 1960 onwards will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases. References eligible for inclusion will be identified through a quality-controlled, multi-level screening process. Extracted data will be presented in diagrammatic and tabular form, with a narrative summary addressing the review questions.


This scoping review will comprehensively map the primary research undertaken to date on plastic exposure and human health. Secondary outputs will include extensive databases on plastic chemicals and human health outcomes/impacts.

Systematic review registration

Open Science Framework (OSF)-Standard Pre-Data Collection Registration,,

Peer Review reports


Continuous human exposure to plastic chemicals has become inevitable due to its ubiquity in the environment [1, 2]. ‘Plastic’ is a broad term for material made up of polymers and usually a number of chemical additives that impart desirable properties, such as flexibility and fire resistance [3, 4]. We will use the term ‘plastic materials’ as an umbrella term inclusive of plastic chemicals, plastic products and plastic particles, and ‘plastic chemicals’ to refer to polymers, monomers and/or additives.

As of 2017, approximately 8300 million metric tons (Mt) of virgin plastic chemicals had been produced, and as of 2015, 6300 million Mt of plastic waste generated [5]. While some of the plastic waste is recycled or incinerated [5], the majority accumulates in landfills or in the environment [5], as macroplastic debris in the oceans [6,7,8], as microparticles in air [9,10,11] and micro- or nanoparticles in soils [12,13,14] and in water supplies [15,16,17,18].

Plastic materials are used in every aspect of our lives [19] and common routes of exposure to plastic chemicals and particles [20] include inhalation [21], ingestion (including trophic transfer) [22,23,24] and direct dermal contact [25,26,27]. Furthermore, children are exposed prenatally to plastic chemicals through maternal and paternal exposure [28], as well as postnatally through breast milk [29].

Of the thousands of plastic chemicals in use globally today, more than 20% have been identified as substances of concern by the European Union on the basis of persistence, bioaccumulation and/or toxicity, while 39% remain unclassified in terms of hazard [30]. Some plastic chemicals are persistent organic pollutants that are known to bioaccumulate in human fatty tissues [31]. A growing body of evidence links human exposure to various plastic chemicals with adverse health impacts [32,33,34,35] and public concern about the threat of plastic pollution on our health is high [36]. Despite this, research efforts have focused on a few plastic chemicals for which established measurement techniques exist [37] and for which a limited range of health impacts have been identified — primarily endocrine disruption [38,39,40], reproductive toxicity [41, 42], carcinogenicity [43, 44], metabolic and nutritional conditions [45] and neurodevelopment [46, 47]. The findings of these studies are often inconsistent, as plastic chemical exposure can show sex-specific effects [38], differentially affect developmental stages [48], have health outcomes in association with specific plastic chemical mixtures [38] and can elicit non-monotonic responses [34]. There are insufficient published data on the toxicity of micro- and nano-plastics in humans [49, 50]; however, an absence of evidence of toxicity does not equate to evidence of safety [51].

We are not aware of any sources or publications comprehensively summarising research conducted to date on how plastic chemicals and plastic particles are impacting human health, or which populations, demographically and geographically, have been studied in this respect. Preliminary searches conducted in Prospero, Epistimonikos, Cochrane, MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) databases in May 2020 did not identify any previous or current scoping review on this broad topic. A number of systematic and literature reviews were identified, focusing on a small number of classes of plastic chemicals (e.g. phthalates) and bisphenol A [52,53,54,55] and certain associated diseases [56, 57]. These systematic and literature reviews addressed only a few specific chemicals and did not evaluate non-disease-specific health domains, such as changes in gene expression, oxidative stress and the microbiome. Demographic and geographic biases (for example, due to social equity issues) were not evaluated, suggesting that many populations could be under-represented in the literature. For example, young children could be highly exposed and particularly vulnerable to the effects of some plastic chemicals [53, 58], and populations in developing countries could be at increased exposure risk [59] due to a combination of higher plastic pollution burden [60], combined with inadequate waste management facilities and lower occupational health and safety regulations [61].

To demonstrate the scope of research conducted to date, and to inform future research efforts, we will conduct a scoping review to chart published primary human in vivo studies that investigated the relationship between exposure to plastic materials and human health since 1960, when global plastic production began to increase exponentially [5]. The scoping review aims to summarise the research to date, identify knowledge gaps and provide a framework for future studies in areas requiring more in-depth research.

Review question

In primary human in vivo research published since 1960 on the effects of plastic materials on health, which plastic chemicals/particles and which health domains have (and have not) been investigated?

In relation to our main question, the following questions will inform sub-analyses:

  1. 1.

    Which populations (geographically, by age group, sex and general/special exposure risk status) have been examined?

  2. 2.

    Which study designs were adopted?

  3. 3.

    When were these studies conducted over time (Jan 1960–Jan 2021)?

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The Population, Exposure and Outcome (PEO) mnemonic (Table 1) was created to construct clear inclusion criteria.

Table 1 PEO framework for identifying the research question and inclusion criteria


The review will consider studies that investigate any population globally, and any age group, including the developing foetus. Animal studies and in vitro human studies will be excluded.


Only in vivo directly measured exposures (i.e. via bio-samples, including for example blood, urine, breast milk and adipose tissue) of plastic materials that meet inclusion criteria will be included. All avenues of exposure are considered relevant, including environmental contact via activities of everyday living, occupational exposure, accidental ingestion through contaminated food or water, cross-placental exposure and ingestion through breast milk.

Plastic material inclusion and exclusion criteria

This scoping review focuses on plastic materials to which humans are generally exposed, other than at the point of synthesis or product manufacturing. A systematic decision-making process (Fig. 1) will be applied to determine the inclusion or exclusion of plastic chemicals. Briefly, plastic additives and synthetic polymers will be identified from preselected references: seven for additives [62,63,64,65,66,67,68] and seven for polymers [32, 69,70,71,72,73,74]. Chemicals that are classified as additive — plasticiser, additive — flame retardant, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), individual polymer or polymer class and bisphenols will be included, unless commonly used in biomedical applications or as food additives (since inclusion would result in the retrieval of many thousands of references unrelated to the effects of plastic chemicals on health). Additional plastic chemicals identified during the screening process, or missing plastic chemicals that are structurally and systematically related to included substances (based on expert decision by authors JA and MB, doctoral degrees in chemistry), will undergo the same selection criteria and subsequently included or excluded. Polymer metabolites, monomers other than bisphenols and plastic additives other than plasticisers and flame retardants are excluded from this review.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic overview of the process for inclusion/exclusion of plastic chemicals in the scoping review

A comprehensive and searchable database of included plastic chemicals will be developed, indexing the multiple names, synonyms and commonly used terminology describing these chemicals.


Only physiological and psychological changes in human health that are directly measured in vivo are included.

Human health outcome measures

Health outcome measures include any assessment of change in structure or function of the human body, whether undertaken at the clinical, functional, physiological or cellular level. From preliminary searches, we anticipate encountering three types of health outcome measures in relation to plastic material exposures:

  1. 1.

    Measures of direct impact on human health as a diagnosis of illness or disease, for example hypothyroidism;

  2. 2.

    Measures of physiological or biochemical change associated with a disease/disorder where no illness/disease has been diagnosed, for example oestrogen levels as a measure of change in ovarian function; and

  3. 3.

    Measures of physiological or biochemical change within an organ/body system that are not associated with a specific disorder, for example genetic and epigenetic changes.

Health outcome measures listed above will be classified using the hierarchical structure of the International Classification of Disease 11th Revision (ICD-11) [75], with an adaptation to incorporate non-diagnostic measures within each body system chapter. This will be done by including ‘Symptoms, signs or clinical findings’ under the body system rather than as a separate chapter; for example, the disorder ‘Ovarian dysfunction’ will have an alternate classification ‘Measures of ovarian dysfunction’. Measures that are not associated with a particular disorder, such as epigenetic changes, will be classified as ‘Health-related measures not related to a specific disorder’ in the relevant ICD Chapter.

Types of sources

This scoping review considers published peer-reviewed journal articles presenting primary human research, inclusive of all study designs. Excluded sources are literature/systematic reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, book reviews/chapters, perspectives, opinion/commentary pieces, conference abstracts and proceedings and grey literature.



The scoping review uses the methodological framework as described in the Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews [76] and reporting will be compliant with the Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist [77] (see Additional file 1 for completed PRISMA-P checklist accompanying this protocol) and informed by Conducting high quality scoping reviews – challenges and solutions [78].

Constructing the search strategy

The search strategy aims to find published studies on plastic materials and human health from 1960 onwards. Although large-scale use of plastic dates back to ~ 1950, the starting point of 1960 was selected as significant increases in global production occurred from the 1960s onward [5].

We identified key articles relevant for our scoping review by conducting an initial scoping search in MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) databases and examining the hierarchy of controlled vocabulary in these databases (MeSH and Emtree respectively). Indexed terms were selected representing plastic materials (including commonly used terms for chemical classes meeting our inclusion criteria) and a broad range of health outcome categories informed by preliminary searches and expert input from author CS, a consultant paediatrician with relevant research expertise (most human health categories being represented, except for those obviously unrelated to plastic chemical exposure or likely to result in the retrieval of many irrelevant results). MeSH and Emtree terms, corresponding text words, text words contained in the titles and abstracts of key articles, and terms and synonyms for all specific plastic chemicals included in our database, will comprise the final search strategy, being developed in consultation with research librarian, author TS. A large number of exclusion terms such as ‘plastic surgery’, plasticity, etc., will be utilised to minimise irrelevant results.

In summary, the search strategy will include the following: Health outcomes AND plastic material exposures NOT exclusions, limited to English language and dates ranging from 1960 to current. A search filter will be used in each database (MEDLINE and Embase, via the Ovid platform) to identify human-only studies and exclude animal studies [79,80,81]. The keywords and indexed terms representing health outcomes will be combined with the Boolean operator OR and combined using the Boolean operator AND with the keywords and indexed terms for plastic materials. The proximity operator ADJ will capture terms adjacent within a tested number of words within the title and abstract fields, and the truncation symbol * will be used where appropriate.

Scopus and Web of Science databases were investigated as sources; however, due to the lack of controlled vocabulary and no filters for human-only studies, these will not be searched.

In anticipation of a very large number of results from this search, the reference lists of retrieved papers will not be reviewed. We will, however, review the reference lists associated with a related ‘Umbrella Review’ of systematic reviews with meta-analyses on this topic, being conducted by the Minderoo Foundation and reported separately (in preparation).

Study selection

All identified articles will be collated and uploaded into the DistillerSR (Evidence Partners, Ottawa, Canada) systematic review software application for screening and data extraction and deduplicated. Relevant articles will then be selected via two screening stages, each preceded by an in-depth training process for the team of reviewers, who have postgraduate and doctoral degrees in chemistry, biochemistry, environmental and health sciences. Training will involve the provision of guidelines, including inclusion/exclusion criteria and practical examples of their application, education on classifying study design, access to our database of included plastic chemicals and demonstration of the screening process using a predetermined set of references to be included for the scoping review, ensuring consistency and reliability of assessment decisions.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Study selection process

References will first be screened for relevance by title, abstract and index terms. Reviewers will initially screen several sets of the same 100 references and discuss their screening decisions, proceeding to single-screening after achieving an 85% level of agreement with subsequently agreed (resolved) group decisions over three sets. References without abstracts but potentially relevant to the scoping review will be included at the first screening stage. Auditing will be performed on a random selection of screened references to evaluate screening accuracy, and we will use the inbuilt artificial intelligence (DistillerAI) tool to identify possible false exclusions, re-screening references as necessary and thereby minimising the number of relevant references being discarded.

During the second screening stage, full-text articles of each reference will be reviewed for eligibility. Training will again involve the screening of several sets of references, with discussions after each set about screening decisions. Reviewers will proceed to single-screening only after achieving an 85% level of agreement with subsequently resolved group decisions and erroneously excluding no more than two per 100 eligible references. Eligible references will proceed to data extraction, whereas references excluded once will require a second reviewer to confirm the exclusion. Any disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer with relevant experience. The selection process will be reported via a PRISMA flowchart (Fig. 2).

Data extraction

The data to be extracted will include specific publication details, study characteristics, relevant plastic material exposures detected in the body and the health outcome measures analysed in relation to exposures. In relation to study design, we anticipate a large number of epidemiological studies involving multiple populations and/or time points of assessment. A simple classification of study design will therefore be implemented, with studies classified as ‘Experimental’ (either with a control/comparator group or without, e.g. skin patch tests), ‘Longitudinal’ (in the case of multiple time points of exposure and/or health outcome), ‘Cross-sectional’ (a single time point for exposure and health outcome, not necessarily measured at the same time) or ‘Case Study/Series’ (no analysis conducted between exposure and outcome). Data extraction forms designed in DistillerSR (drafts are provided in Additional file 2) will be piloted extensively during a period of training, involving independent reviewing followed by group meetings to discuss decisions and revise forms as necessary (final versions to be provided in the scoping review paper). Two reviewers will extract data from the full text of each reference. Reviewer pairs will discuss conflicts that arise, with input from a third reviewer with the most relevant expertise if assistance is required to resolve decisions. References may be excluded during this phase if found ineligible or if it is impossible to extract data due to ambiguity or poor reporting quality, with the reasons for exclusion reported in the final paper.

The findings reported in the included studies, i.e. correlations between plastic material exposures and health outcome measures, or lack thereof, will not be recorded, since we are following the typical scoping review framework, without conducting quality assessment of retrieved articles. The afore-mentioned ‘Umbrella Review’ of systematic reviews with meta-analyses will capture high-level evidence on this topic.

Data analysis and presentation

Frequency counts and descriptive statistics will be presented for publication details and study characteristics. The extracted data will be presented graphically, in diagrammatic and tabular form, in a manner that aligns with the objective of this scoping review. A narrative summary will accompany the tabulated and charted results.

Graphical illustrations will show the trend, by year of publication, for when studies about the health impacts of plastic material exposures were conducted; the number of articles by country of authors and investigated study populations; age ranges and sex of participants; frequency of the different study designs used; the plastic material exposures and health outcome measures. The results will be presented to address the research questions, make comparisons, identify methodologies used and identify research gaps.


This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of research published since 1960 on the exposure of humans to plastic materials and the health outcome measures assessed. Due to the breadth of our review question, we anticipate a large number of studies to intersect with the PEO framework. A detailed search strategy has been designed to identify eligible studies based on all three criteria: in vivo human populations, directly measured plastic materials that are included according to clear criteria and scientifically reliable sources, and direct measures of human health outcomes.

While health outcomes traditionally involve diseases and health conditions, the potential impacts of plastic materials may be subtle, perhaps only becoming apparent over time. By minimally adapting the ICD-11 sub-categories to incorporate measures of physiological or biochemical change that are not associated with specific disorders (e.g. epigenetic changes and oxidative stress), this scoping review aims to identify a wider suite of health outcome measures that should be taken into consideration for plastic material exposure research. This database could also benefit future research endeavours.

In summary, this scoping review will provide an overview of the research so far undertaken on plastic material exposure and human health. This can serve as a basis to identify research clusters, by topic and geographical location of studied populations, as well as knowledge gaps, helping to prioritise specific areas in need of more in-depth research. Additionally, alongside the primary outputs, findings may be used to strengthen efforts to better regulate the production, importation and use of plastic materials that human populations are ubiquitously exposed to.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed will be included in the final published scoping review article and additional information related to the protocol will be available upon reasonable request.



International Classification of Disease 11th Revision


Joanna Briggs Institute


Open Science Framework


Population, Exposure and Outcome


Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews

Plastic chemicals:

Polymers, monomers and/or additives

Plastic materials:

Plastic chemicals, plastic products and/or plastic particles


  1. Landrigan PJ, Stegeman JJ, Fleming LE, Allemand D, Anderson DM, Backer LC, et al. Human health and ocean pollution. Ann Glob Health. 2020;86(1):1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmann M, Mützel S, Primpke S, Tekman MB, Trachsel J, Gerdts G. White and wonderful? Microplastics prevail in snow from the Alps to the Arctic. Sci Adv. 2019;5(8):1–10.

  3. Directive (EU) 2019/904. The reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment. Off J Eur Union Eur Parliam Counc. L 155/1:1–19.

  4. Fahlman BD. Polymeric Materials. In: Materials Chemistry. Springer, Dordrecht. Available from:

  5. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv. 2017;3(7): e1700782.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cózar A, Echevarría F, González-Gordillo JI, Irigoien X, Úbeda B, Hernández-León S, et al. Plastic debris in the open ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(28):10239–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Der Mheen M, Van Sebille E, Pattiaratchi C. Beaching patterns of plastic debris along the Indian Ocean rim. Ocean Sci. 2020;16(5):1317–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jang YC, Lee J, Hong S, Lee JS, Shim WJ, Song YK. Sources of plastic marine debris on beaches of Korea: more from the ocean than the land. Ocean Sci J. 2014;49(2):151–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liao Z, Ji X, Ma Y, Lv B, Huang W, Zhu X, et al. Airborne microplastics in indoor and outdoor environments of a coastal city in Eastern China. J Hazard Mater. 2021;5(417): 126007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dris R, Gasperi J, Saad M, Mirande C, Tassin B. Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: a source of microplastics in the environment? Mar Pollut Bull. 2016;104(1–2):290–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wesch C, Elert AM, Wörner M, Braun U, Klein R, Paulus M. Assuring quality in microplastic monitoring: about the value of clean-air devices as essentials for verified data. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scheurer M, Bigalke M. Microplastics in Swiss floodplain soils. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(6):3591–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. He P, Chen L, Shao L, Zhang H, Lü F. Municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill: a source of microplastics? - evidence of microplastics in landfill leachate. Water Res. 2019;1(159):38–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wahl A, Le Juge C, Davranche M, El Hadri H, Grassl B, Reynaud S, et al. Nanoplastic occurrence in a soil amended with plastic debris. Chemosphere. 2021;1(262): 127784.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pivokonsky M, Cermakova L, Novotna K, Peer P, Cajthaml T, Janda V. Occurrence of microplastics in raw and treated drinking water. Sci Total Environ. 2018;1(643):1644–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mintenig SM, Löder MGJ, Primpke S, Gerdts G. Low numbers of microplastics detected in drinking water from ground water sources. Sci Total Environ. 2019;15(648):631–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kosuth M, Mason SA, Wattenberg EV. Anthropogenic contamination of tap water, beer, and sea salt. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(4): e0194970.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lai Y, Dong L, Li Q, Li P, Hao Z, Yu S, et al. Counting nanoplastics in environmental waters by single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy after cloud-point extraction and in situ labeling of gold nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(8):4783–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Sousa FDB. The role of plastic concerning the sustainable development goals: the literature point of view. Clean Responsible Consum. 2021;1(3): 100020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Enyoh CE, Shafea L, Verla AW, Verla EN, Qingyue W, Chowdhury T, et al. Microplastics exposure routes and toxicity studies to ecosystems: an overview, vol. 35. Environmental Health and Toxicology: Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pauly JL, Stegmeier SJ, Allaart HA, Cheney RT, Zhang PJ, Mayer AG, et al. Inhaled cellulosic and plastic fibers found in human lung tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7(5):419–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dar E, Kanarek MS, Anderson HA, Sonzogni WC. Fish consumption and reproductive outcomes in Green Bay. Wisconsin Environ Res. 1992;59(1):189–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson HA, Wolff MS, Lilis R, Holstein EC, Valciukas JA, Anderson KE, et al. Symptoms and clinical abnormalities following ingestion of polybrominated-biphenyl-contaminated food products. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1979;320(1):684–702.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jamieson DJ, Terrell ML, Aguocha NN, Small CM, Cameron LL, Marcus M. Dietary exposure to brominated flame retardants and abnormal pap test results. J Womens Health. 2011;20(9):1269–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lv Y, Lu S, Dai Y, Rui C, Wang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Higher dermal exposure of cashiers to BPA and its association with DNA oxidative damage. Environ Int. 2017;1(98):69–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lazarov A, Cordoba M. Purpuric contact dermatitis in patients with allergic reaction to textile dyes and resins. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14(2):101–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Majasuo S, Liippo J, Lammintausta K. Non-occupational contact sensitization to epoxy resin of bisphenol A among general dermatology patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(3):148–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Breton CV, Landon R, Kahn LG, Enlow MB, Peterson AK, Bastain T, et al. Exploring the evidence for epigenetic regulation of environmental influences on child health across generations. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chao H-R, Wang S-L, Lee W-J, Wang Y-F, Päpke O. Levels of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in breast milk from central Taiwan and their relation to infant birth outcome and maternal menstruation effects. Environ Int. 2007;33(2):239–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wiesinger H, Wang Z, Hellweg S. Deep dive into plastic monomers, additives, and processing aids. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(13):9339–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jackson E, Shoemaker R, Larian N, Cassis L. Adipose tissue as a site of toxin accumulation. Compr Physiol. 2017;7(4):1085–135.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lithner D, Larsson A, Dave G. Environmental and health hazard ranking and assessment of plastic polymers based on chemical composition. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409(18):3309–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Demeneix BA. Evidence for prenatal exposure to thyroid disruptors and adverse effects on brain development. Eur Thyroid J. 2019;8(6):283–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vandenberg L, Colborn T, Hayes T, Heindel J, Jacobs D, Lee D, et al. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(3):378–455.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vethaak AD, Legler J. Microplastics and human health. Science. 2021;371(6530):672–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Davison SMC, White MP, Pahl S, Taylor T, Fielding K, Roberts BR, et al. Public concern about, and desire for research into, the human health effects of marine plastic pollution: results from a 15-country survey across Europe and Australia. Glob Environ Change. 2021;17: 102309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Manini P, Andreoli R, Niessen W. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in occupational toxicology: a novel approach to the study of biotransformation of industrial chemicals. J Chromatogr A. 2004;1058(1–2):21–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tanner EM, Hallerbäck MU, Wikström S, Lindh C, Kiviranta H, Gennings C, et al. Early prenatal exposure to suspected endocrine disruptor mixtures is associated with lower IQ at age seven. Environ Int. 2020;1(134): 105185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fu X, Xu J, Zhang R, Yu J. The association between environmental endocrine disruptors and cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2020;1(187): 109464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS, et al. EDC-2: the Endocrine Society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):E1-150.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cai H, Zheng W, Zheng P, Wang S, Tan H, He G, et al. Human urinary/seminal phthalates or their metabolite levels and semen quality: a meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2015;1(142):486–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Golestanzadeh M, Riahi R, Kelishadi R. Association of phthalate exposure with precocious and delayed pubertal timing in girls and boys: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2020;22(4):873–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Boffetta P, Catalani S, Tomasi C, Pira E, Apostoli P. Occupational exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and risk of cutaneous melanoma: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018;27(1):62–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang K, Shi H, Peng J, Wang Y, Xiong X, Wu C, et al. Microplastic pollution in China’s inland water systems: a review of findings, methods, characteristics, effects, and management. Sci Total Environ. 2018;15(630):1641–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim KY, Lee E, Kim Y. The association between bisphenol A exposure and obesity in children-a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(14):E2521.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lam J, Lanphear BP, Bellinger D, Axelrad DA, McPartland J, Sutton P, et al. Developmental PBDE exposure and IQ/ADHD in childhood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(8):086001.

  47. Radke EG, Braun JM, Nachman RM, Cooper GS. Phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidence. Environ Int. 2020;1(137): 105408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Braun JM. Early-life exposure to EDCs: role in childhood obesity and neurodevelopment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2016 133. 2016;13(3):161–73.

  49. SAPEA, Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. A Scientific Perspective on Microplastics in Nature and Society. Berlin: SAPEA; 2019. Available from:

  50. World Health Organization. Microplastics in drinking-water [Internet]. 2019 p. 1–101. Report No.: 9789241516198. Available from:

  51. Leslie HA, Depledge MH. Where is the evidence that human exposure to microplastics is safe? Environ Int. 2020;1(142): 105807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gómez-Mercado CA, Mejía-Sandoval G, Segura-Cardona ÁM, Arango-Alzate CM, Hernández-González SI, Patiño-García DF, et al. Exposición a Bisfenol A (BPA) en mujeres embarazadas y su relación con la obesidad en sus hijos: revisión sistemática. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. 2018;36(1):66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ejaredar M, Lee Y, Roberts DJ, Sauve R, Dewey D. Bisphenol A exposure and children’s behavior: a systematic review. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017;272. 2016;27(2):175–83.

  54. Jeddi MZ, Janani L, Memari AH, Akhondzadeh S, yunesian M. The role of phthalate esters in autism development: a systematic review. Environ Res. 2016;151:493–504.

  55. Zarean M, Keikha M, Feizi A, Kazemitabaee M, Kelishadi R. The role of exposure to phthalates in variations of anogenital distance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2019;1(247):172–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Rochester JR. Bisphenol A and human health: a review of the literature. Reprod Toxicol. 2013;1(42):132–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Hauser R, Calafat AM. Phthalates and human health. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(11):806–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wu M, Tu C, Liu G, Zhong H. Time to safeguard the future generations from the omnipresent microplastics. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021 Jul 5 [cited 2021 Aug 17]; Available from:

  59. Velis CA, Cook E. Mismanagement of plastic waste through open burning with emphasis on the global south: a systematic review of risks to occupational and public health. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55:7186–207.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lebreton L, Andrady A. Future scenarios of global plastic waste generation and disposal. Palgrave Commun. 2019;5(1):1–11.

  61. Johannes HP, Kojima M, Iwasaki F, Edita EP. Applying the extended producer responsibility towards plastic waste in Asian developing countries for reducing marine plastic debris. Waste Manag Res J Int Solid Wastes Public Clean Assoc ISWA. 2021;39(5):690–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). Mapping exercise – plastic additives initiative. European Chemicals Agency. [cited 2020 Jul 21]. Available from:

  63. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). Candidate list of substances of very high concern for authorisation [Internet]. European Chemicals Agency. 2021 [cited 2020 Jul 21]. Available from:

  64. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). Substances restricted under REACH. [cited 2020 Jul 21]. Available from:

  65. Stockholm Convention. Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants (POPS). UN Environment Programme; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 21]. Available from:

  66. Stockholm Convention. POPRC recommendations for listing chemicals. 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 21]. Available from:

  67. Groh KJ, Backhaus T, Carney-Almroth B, Geueke B, Inostroza PA, Lennquist A, et al. Overview of known plastic packaging-associated chemicals and their hazards. Sci Total Environ. 2019;651:3253–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). ATSDR’s substance priority list [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 16]. Available from:

  69. CROW (Chemical Retrieval on the Web). CROW Polymer Science. CROW Polymer Science. 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 27]. Available from:

  70. Wypych G. Handbook of polymers. Second edition. Toronto: ChemTec Publishing; 2016. 706 p. Available from:

  71. Koltzenburg S, Maskos M, Nuyken O. Polymer chemistry. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2017. Available from:

  72. Ravve A. Principles of polymer chemistry. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2012. Available from:

  73. Braun D, Cherdron H, Rehahn M, Ritter H, Voit B. Polymer synthesis: theory and practice: fundamentals, methods, experiments. 5th ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2013. Available from:

  74. Salamone JC. Polymeric materials encyclopedia. Vol. 9. London New York: CRC Press; 1996. 554 p. Available from:

  75. World Health, Organization (WHO). International Classification of Diseases, eleventh revision (ICD-11). 2019. Available from: Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-ND 3.0 IGO).

  76. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Httpsdoiorg107326M18–0850. 2018;169(7):467–73.

  78. Khalil H, Peters MDJ, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Alexander L, McInerney P, et al. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;1(130):156–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Venn M. Subject guides: systematic reviews for health: 8. Search limits. 2020. Available from:

  80. Bramer W, Fowler S, Ket J, Otten R, Riphagen I. Animal studies exclusion - bmi-online search blocks. Biomedische Informatie. 2020. Available from:

  81. Tessier V. Human studies. CHLA Canadian Health Libraries Association. 2019. Available from:!biblio3s/doku.php?id=concepts:etudes-sur-les-humains

Download references


The selection of specific plastic materials and associated terms was determined in consultation with polymer science expert Dr Marck Norret, The University of Western Australia. We also acknowledge the contribution from Brady Johnston, Minderoo Foundation, to create searchable online databases of our included plastics and health outcome measures, using the “Shiny” package in RStudio, and from Meredith Ryland and Joanne Webb, Minderoo Foundation, towards the writing of this manuscript.


This scoping review was funded by the Minderoo Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Scoping review design: SAD, CS, LMG, DH, TD, HN, EVSW, PT. Manuscript: LG, EVSW, LM, PT, MB, TS, YM, SAD (guarantor). Review of manuscript: CS, JA, TD, HN, AL, DH. Identification of plastics and their sources: EW, JA, CS, AL. Classification of study designs, health outcomes and measures: BS, CS, LM. Coding and data management: OC, EVSW. Assistance with search strategy design: AN. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah A. Dunlop.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Formal research ethics approval is not required for scoping review of the published literature. The findings of the scoping review will be disseminated via the Minderoo Foundation website, peer-reviewed scientific publication, presented at congresses or conferences, to policy makers and stakeholders aiming to achieve a world free of plastic pollution, and through various social media platforms. Data deposition and curation will be managed by the Minderoo Foundation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Completed PRISMA-P checklist.

Additional file 2.

Draft data extraction forms.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goodes, L.M., Wong, E.V.S., Alex, J. et al. A scoping review protocol on in vivo human plastic exposure and health impacts. Syst Rev 11, 137 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Human
  • Plastic
  • Plastic chemicals
  • Polymers
  • Additives
  • Exposure
  • Health
  • Toxicity