Skip to main content
Download PDF

Protocol for a systematic review of treatment adherence for HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis among homeless populations

Systematic Reviews volume 9, Article number: 211 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Homelessness is a global issue and HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis are known to be prevalent in this group. Homeless populations face significant barriers to care. We aim to summarise evidence of treatment initiation and completion for homeless populations with these infections, and their associated factors, through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We will search MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL for all study types and conference abstracts looking at either (1) treatment initiation in a cohort experiencing homelessness with at least one of HIV, hepatitis C, active tuberculosis and/or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI); (2) treatment completion for those who initiated treatment. We will perform a meta-analysis of the proportion of those with each infection who initiate and complete treatment, as well as analysis of individual and health system factors that may affect adherence levels. We will evaluate the quality of research papers using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Discussion

Given the political emphasis on global elimination of these diseases, and the current lack of understanding of effective and equitable treatment adherence strategies in homeless populations, this review will provide insight to policy-makers and service providers aiming to improve homeless healthcare.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42019153150

Peer Review reports

Background

The last global survey by the United Nations (UN) in 2005 estimated that 100 million people worldwide were homeless [1]. More recent estimates in 2017 suggest the number is around 150 million people—approximately 2% of the global population [2]. Recent reports show homelessness is growing across almost all European countries [3] and is a significant problem in the USA [4]. With so many people represented within this group, and most with very complex health needs and extremely poor health outcomes [5], homeless health remains an important area of research.

A 2012 systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence data found studies reporting 0.3 to 21.1% of homeless people have HIV, 3.9 to 36.2% have hepatitis C infection, and 0.2 to 7.7% have tuberculosis [6]. Given the extremely high burden of these communicable diseases, the authors highlighted identifying and managing these infections within homeless health services as a public health priority.

It has previously been shown that a high proportion of homeless people who are diagnosed with one or more of these infections do not either initiate or complete treatment [7,8,9,10,11]. Barriers include mobility among homeless people leading to loss to follow-up; more pressing medical or social needs [7]; lack of attendance to follow-up appointments [12]; stigma and discrimination; on-going alcohol and drug use and criminilisation of these behaviours; lack of stable housing [13]; incarceration; fear of invasive investigations such as liver biopsy; fear of treatment side effects; transport and location of treatment services; lack of flexible appointment times; and problems remembering appointments [14, 15]. With the political emphasis on global elimination of these diseases [16,17,18], ensuring strategies are in place to overcome these challenges to treatment is essential.

Despite these well-evidenced barriers to care, a systematic review looking at rates of treatment initiation and completion for HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis in homeless populations is yet to be undertaken. As well as providing useful data for each infection, such a study could provide understanding as to whether specific factors influence likelihood to adhere to treatment within this cohort. In addition, treatments for these diseases have improved considerably in recent years. Treatment for hepatitis C, for example, has been revolutionised by widespread access to novel direct-acting antiviral treatment (DAAT) [19]. However, understanding the extent to which these benefits have reached the homeless population is lacking.

We aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment initiation and completion rates for HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis (both active and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI)). Collectively, we will refer to treatment initiation and completion as a measure of ‘adherence’. We will analyse papers studying how many homeless people with one or more of these conditions initiate treatment, and/or the number of those who go on to complete treatment. For hepatitis C, we will only include studies using regimens containing DAAT, either as part of treatment or the entire treatment regimen. DAAT requires particular study as it has revolutionised hepatitis C therapy in terms of effectiveness and tolerability and will soon be the mainstay of treatment [19]. For HIV, as there is no end-point to treatment, we will use undetectable viral load as a proxy for sustained treatment adherence instead (which we will categorise as ‘treatment completion’ to parallel other infections). We will include any paper which measures at least one data point for at least one of these diseases.

We will also examine the data for individual and health system factors (as defined later) which are linked to adherence. We hope this data will help enable policymakers and service providers to design more effective and equitable health systems for homeless populations to access treatment for these infections.

Methods

Protocol

This protocol is registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42019153150) and reported in accordance with guidance provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement [20].

Information source and literature search

We will search MEDLINE, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for English Language studies from 1990 onwards. 1990 was chosen to balance gathering sufficient papers for analysis with ensuring papers identified are relevant to the challenges faced by homeless populations today. We will also perform hand-searching of the reference lists of included studies, as well as looking up studies which cite our included studies. We will consider all study types and conference abstracts which report homeless population data looking at either (1) treatment initiation in a cohort known or found to have at least one of HIV, hepatitis C, active tuberculosis or LTBI; (2) treatment completion for those who initiated treatment for either HIV, hepatitis C, active tuberculosis or LTBI.

The literature search terms have been designed in collaboration with two experienced health information specialists—one based at University College London, one based at the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital. Full details of the search terms are available in the Appendix.

Eligibility criteria

We will select studies based on the following criteria:

Population—we will define homelessness as adults with no fixed abode (owned or rented), who rely on temporary accommodation, live in institutions or shelters, or live rough (in a context where most people have homes, and homelessness is not because of war, conflict or natural disaster). As we expect to only find a small number of papers meeting our criteria, we will include those in single-room occupancies or marginally-housed within our definition. Study participants must all be currently homeless (for any length of time) and not people with a history of homelessness only. If a subset of a population within a study is homeless, but the data has not been reported separately, we will attempt to contact the authors to obtain homeless-specific data. If they are uncontactable or the data is not available, we will exclude such studies from our review. All homeless people must be clinically diagnosed with at least one of HIV, hepatitis C, active tuberculosis or LTBI either prior to the study or through testing within the study itself. As the type of diagnostic test used will vary, we will accept any individual as having an infection if there is intention-to-treat. We will include homeless people who inject drugs (PWID), but also endeavour to perform an analysis of this group separately within the review if possible due to the unique barriers to care and additional risks of infection and reinfection this group faces. We aim to only look at populations aged 18 years or over. If data contains individuals under 18, we will attempt to contact the authors to obtain data specific to those over 18. If they are uncontactable or data is not available, we will only include samples where the majority of the sample population are over 18; if this is uncertain or not the case, we will exclude such studies from our review. We will look at countries with any income, but will also perform separate analyses based on the World Bank’s divisions of country income [21]).

Intervention—we will include any study aiming to treat one or more of the infections. For hepatitis C treatment, we will only include regimens containing DAAT, as previously described.

Comparison—we will attempt to compare treatment initiation and completion of HIV, hepatitis C, active tuberculosis and LTBI with the general population in that geographical region. Data for the general population will be gathered from contemporaneous research papers, reports and surveillance data where available.

Outcome—our primary outcome will be the proportion of those known or identified as having one of the infections who then initiate and/or complete treatment.

Our secondary aim is to analyse individual and health system factors which could influence adherence levels. We will mark studies including analysis of factors that could contribute to different adherence rates within homeless populations and conduct narrative review of these studies. We anticipate that important individual factors may include history of incarceration, use of injection drugs and mental health problems. We anticipate that health system factors may include the location of treatment services, flexibility of appointment time and programme adherence techniques (including DOTS (Directly Observe Treatment, Short-Course) having a case manager, phone call check-ins, remuneration for patients and housing of homeless patients during treatment). We will be open to including additional adherence techniques we encounter in the literature whilst collating papers.

Type of study—we expect most data will be derived from observational, uncontrolled studies but we will consider any study type looking at any aspect of treatment initiation or completion. We will also look at conference abstracts, taking care to ensure they do not duplicate data from published papers. Included studies do not need to cover both treatment initiation and completion, but must report at least one measure of initiation or completion for at least one disease.

Data collection and analysis

Selection of studies

Articles will firstly be double-screened by title and abstract for potentially eligible studies. Any discrepancies will be discussed between the two independent reviewers—if these cannot be resolved, a third reviewer will be involved in the decision. All potentially eligible studies will then be read as full-text papers by two independent reviewers to determine eligibility. Any disagreement which cannot be resolved between the two reviewers will be reviewed by the third reviewer.

Data extraction

One reviewer will undertake data extraction with accuracy checked by a second reviewer. A standardised, pretested form will be used to log specific data points for each of the diseases. Any disagreement which cannot be resolved between the two reviewers will again be reviewed by the third reviewer. The data we will collect is detailed in Table 1.

Table 1 Data to be extracted from studies included within the review
Full size table

Data analysis

Our primary aim is to evaluate treatment initiation and completion for each infection. We will report the range of proportions in studies identified, and perform random-effects meta-analyses of proportions to report the average values across studies. We will also perform subanalyses based on the World Bank’s divisions of country income [21].

Our secondary aim is to understand how individual and health system factors influence treatment initiation and completion within homeless populations for each infection. This will be a narrative analysis, and we will consider post-hoc quantitative analysis if there is sufficient data.

We will evaluate the quality of research papers using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and analyse the data to look for heterogeneity with Cochran’s Q and the I2 statistic. We also intend to perform sensitivity analyses, dependent on the data we obtain—this will include an analysis based upon research quality. When looking for statistical significance, we will measure effects at the 95% confidence intervals.

Strengths and limitations of analysis

To our knowledge, this study will provide the first overview of treatment initiation and completion for important communicable diseases among homeless populations and can inform international policy that aims to eliminate these infections. Homeless populations are likely to experience similar barriers to treatment for all the infections included in this review, and our inclusion of the different infections will allow us to draw on a wider pool of evidence when discussing barriers.

We are aware of several limitations to our analysis. Detail of treatment interventions is likely to vary considerably between studies, and variations in documentation and measurement practices may limit the number of studies that can be included in meta-analysis.

Furthermore, much of the data surrounding individual factors is likely to be collected from questionnaires filled in by participants. Given the sensitivity and stigmatisation of many of the suggested factors, there could be an under-reporting of such risk factors in studies.

Finally, studies are likely to be observational and uncontrolled, limiting the ability to draw causal inferences as to the effect individual and health system factors have on adherence. Pragmatically, however, data will be useful to current health system design and for directing researchers wanting to explore with greater rigour any factors found to affect treatment adherence within this population.

Discussion

To effectively and equitably treat homeless populations with HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis, better understanding is needed as to the proportion of those with each infection who initiate and complete treatment. This review is especially pertinent given the political commitment to global elimination of these diseases [16,17,18] and recent advances in treatments.

Furthermore, understanding the individual and health system factors which affect adherence will be useful to policymakers and service providers working to improve homeless healthcare, particularly surrounding these infections.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Abbreviations

CINAHL:

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature

DAAT:

Direct-acting antiviral treatment

DOTS:

Directly Observe Treatment, Short-Course

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

LTBI:

Latent tuberculosis infection

PRISMA-P:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols

PWID:

People who inject drugs

References

  1. UN News. Growing privatization of property among reasons driving homelessness, UN rights expert says. 2005. Available from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2005/05/137592-growing-privatization-property-among-reasons-driving-homelessness-un-rights [Accessed 28 Sept 2019].

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yale University. As Cities Grow, So Do the Numbers of Homeless. 2017. Available from: https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/cities-grow-so-do-numbers-homeless [Accessed 28 Sept 2019].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abbé Pierre Foundation and FEANTSA. Third Overview of Housing Exclusion in Europe. 2018. Available from: https://www.feantsa.org/download/full-report-en1029873431323901915.pdf [Accessed Sept 2019].

  4. National Alliance to End Homelessness. State of Homelessness. 2018. Available from: https://endhomelessness.org/homelessness-in-america/homelessness-statistics/state-of-homelessness-report/ [Accessed 28 Sept 2019].

  5. Kushel MB, Vittinghoff E, Haas JS. Factors associated with the health care utilization of homeless persons. JAMA. 2001;285(2):200–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.2.200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beijer U, Wolf A, Fazel S. Prevalence of tuberculosis, hepatitis C virus, and HIV in homeless people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2012;12(11):859–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70177-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beiser ME, Smith K, Ingemi M, Mulligan E, Baggett TP. Hepatitis C treatment outcomes among homeless-experienced individuals at a community health centre in Boston. Int J of Drug Policy. 2019;72:129–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.03.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Macbeth K, Davidson K, Anderson J. Treating hepatitis C in a dedicated GP practice for homeless patients: a multidisciplinary approach. Gastrointestinal Nursing. 2018;16(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.12968/gasn.2018.16.Sup10.S29.

  9. Laurenti P, Bruno S, Quaranta G, et al. Tuberculosis in sheltered homeless population of rome: an integrated model of recruitment for risk management. Scientific World J. 2012;396302. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/396302.

  10. Milloy MJ, Kerr T, Bangsberg DR, et al. Homelessness as a structural barrier to effective antiretroviral therapy among HIV-seropositive illicit drug users in a canadian setting. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012;26(1):60–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2011.0169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Barocas JA, Beiser M. Casey León et al. Experience and outcomes of hepatitis C treatment in a cohort of homeless and marginally housed adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(6):880–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Southern A, Premaratne N, English M, et al. Tuberculosis among homeless people in London: an effective model of screening and treatment. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999;3(11):1001–1008(8).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris M, Rhodes T. Hepatitis C treatment access and uptake for people who inject drugs: a review mapping the role of social factors. Harm Reduction J. 2013;10(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-10-7.

  14. Lambert JS, Murtagh R, Menezes D, et al. ‘HepCheck Dublin’: an intensified hepatitis C screening programme in a homeless population demonstrates the need for alternative models of care. BMC Infec Dis. 2019;19:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3748-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Crowley D, Cullen W, Laird E, et al. Exploring patient characteristics and barriers to hepatitis c treatment in patients on opioid substitution treatment attending a community based fibro-scanning clinic. J Transl Int Med. 2017;5(2):112–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtim-2017-0017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. UNAIDS. 90-90-90 - An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. 2017. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2017/90-90-90 [Accessed 1 Oct 2019].

  17. World Health Organisation. Draft global health sector strategies: Viral hepatitis. 2016-2021:2016 Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69/A69_32-en.pdf?ua=1 [Accessed 1 Oct 2019].

  18. World Health Organisation. The End TB Strategy. 2014. Available from: https://www.who.int/tb/strategy/End_TB_Strategy.pdf?ua=1 [Accessed 1 Oct 2019].

  19. Lam BP, Jeffers T, Younoszai Z, et al. The changing landscape of hepatitis C virus therapy: focus on interferon-free treatment. Therap Adv in Gastro. 2015;8(5):298–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X15587481.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. 2019. Available from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups [Accessed 28 Sept 2019].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

LJ is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Fellowship. This paper presents independent research. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. DL is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Research Fellowship (DRF-2018-11-ST2-016). This paper presents independent research. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. RWA is supported by the Wellcome Trust through a Wellcome Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship [206602].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Collaborative Centre for Inclusion Health, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HT, UK

    Luke Johnson, Dan Lewer, Andrew C. Hayward & Alistair Story

  2. Department of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

    Luke Johnson

  3. The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK

    Robert W. Aldridge

Authors
  1. Luke Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dan Lewer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert W. Aldridge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew C. Hayward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alistair Story
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LJ and AS led the development of the protocol concept, and all authors (LJ, DL, RA, AC, AS) were involved in refining the design. LJ wrote the draft of the protocol. All authors (LJ, DL, RA, AC, AS) critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Lewer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

No competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Search Terms

The following subject headings are to be included for homelessness if present in the database: Transients and Migrants (MEDLINECINAHL)Homeless Youth (MEDLINEEmbase)Homeless Persons (MEDLINECINAHL)Homelessness (EmbaseCINAHL)Homeless Person (Embase)Homeless Woman (Embase)Homeless Man (Embase)Runaways (EmbaseCINAHL)Migrant Worker (Embase). These terms will be combined with a text word search for the following: homeless*. This search was performed in all three databases looking only at the title and abstract of articles

The following subject headings are to be included for HIV/AIDS if present in the database: HIV (MEDLINE), HIV infections (MEDLINE, CINAHL), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Embase, CINAHL), Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection (Embase), AIDS Virus (Embase), AIDS Victim (Embase), AIDS Sufferer (Embase), AIDS Related Complex (Embase), AIDS Serodiagnosis (CINAHL). These terms will be combined with text word searches for the following: HIV OR human ADJ1 immun* ADJ1 deficiency OR human ADJ1 immun* deficiency ADJ1 virus OR “acquired immune deficiency syndrome” OR AIDS. Searches will be performed in all three databases looking only at the title and abstract of articles.

The following subject headings are to be included for hepatitis C if present in the databases: Hepatitis C (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL), Hepatitis C Antibodies (MEDLINE, Embase), Hepatitis C Antigens (MEDLINE, Embase), Hepacivirus (MEDLINE), Hepatitis C Antigen (Embase), Hepatitis C Antibody (Embase), Hepatitis C Virus (Embase), Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 (Embase), Hepatitis C Rapid Test (Embase). These terms will be combined with text word searches for the following: “hepatitis C” OR HCV. Searches will be performed in all three databases looking only at the title and abstract of articles.

The following subject headings are to be included for tuberculosis if present in the databases: Tuberculosis (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MEDLINE, CINAHL), Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MEDLINE), Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (Embase). These terms will be combined with text word searches for the following: tuberculosis OR TB OR LTBI. Searches will be performed in all three databases looking only at the title and abstract of articles.

The following subject headings are to be included for treatment if present in the databases: therapeutics (MEDLINE, CINAHL), treatment adherence and compliance (MEDLINE), Anti-retroviral agents (MEDLINE), Anti-HIV agents (MEDLINE), Anti-infective agents (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL), therapy (Embase), drug therapy (Embase), Medication Compliance (Embase, CINAHL), Antiretrovirus Agent (Embase), Antimicrobial therapy (Embase), Antiviral therapy (Embase). These terms will be combined with text word searches for the following: treatment OR “initiation” OR “completion” OR therapeutics or medication OR “viral suppression” OR “viral load”. Searches will be performed in all three databases looking only at the title and abstract or articles.

The homelessness category will then be combined with the AND operator for the treatment category, and the AND operator for each of the three disease categories: HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C and tuberculosis. The results of each combination of homelessness plus treatment plus disease will be combined via the OR operator. Limiters based on publication date (from 1990 onwards) and on language (English only) will then be applied at this stage. We will then review the results of all papers together.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, L., Lewer, D., Aldridge, R.W. et al. Protocol for a systematic review of treatment adherence for HIV, hepatitis C and tuberculosis among homeless populations. Syst Rev 9, 211 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01470-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01470-y

Keywords

Systematic Reviews

ISSN: 2046-4053