Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion for hydrocephalus in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

  • James J. M. Loan1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Ncedile Mankahla3, 4, 5,
  • Graeme Meintjes3, 4 and
  • A. Graham Fieggen1, 3, 4, 5
Systematic Reviews20176:201

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0603-7

Received: 9 March 2017

Accepted: 4 October 2017

Published: 16 October 2017

Abstract

Background

Hydrocephalus is a recognised complication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related opportunistic infections. Symptomatic raised cerebrospinal fluid pressure can be treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion (VPS). In HIV-infected patients however, there is a concern that VPS might be associated with unacceptably high rates of mortality. We aim to systematically review and appraise published literature to determine reported outcomes and identify predictors of outcome following VPS in relevant subgroups of HIV-infected adults.

Methods

The following electronic databases will be searched: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), LILACS (BIREME), Research Registry (www.researchregistry.com), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and OpenSIGLE database. Any randomised studies, cohort studies, case-control studies, interrupted time series or sequential case series reporting survival following VPS in HIV-infected individuals will be included. If high-quality homogenous studies exist, meta-analysis will be conducted to determine 1-, 6- and 12-month mortality with comparison made between underlying aetiologies of hydrocephalus.

Discussion and conclusion

This study will generate a comprehensive review of VPS in HIV-infected patients for publication. The primary outcome of meta-analysis is 12-month survival. If only low-quality, heterogeneous studies are available, this study will demonstrate this deficiency and will be of value in justifying and aiding the design of future studies.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42016052239

Background

Description of the condition

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a lentivirus and is the causative organism for the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) [1]. Two major subtypes of HIV—HIV-1 and HIV-2—are known to exist [2]. Over 95% of patients infected with HIV will, without treatment, develop progressive immunodeficiency as indicated by falling CD4-positive T cell counts and/or development of AIDS defining illnesses within 10 years of seroconversion [3, 4]. In general, disease progression is slower in those infected with HIV-2 compared with the globally more common HIV-1 [1, 2].

HIV infection is associated with myriad central nervous system (CNS) sequelae. These include, but are not limited to, toxoplasmosis, primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), tuberculous meningitis (TBM), cryptococcal meningitis and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) [58]. These may all disrupt cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation causing an abnormal accumulation of CSF within the cranium, an associated rise in intracranial pressure and consequent cerebral injury. This condition is called hydrocephalus. In communicating hydrocephalus, ventricular CSF is continuous with CSF in the subarachnoid space. Communicating hydrocephalus develops because of excessive CSF production or reduced CSF resorption [9]. In non-communicating hydrocephalus, CSF passage from the ventricles to subarachnoid space is occluded. With time and successful treatment of the primary pathology, acute hydrocephalus might resolve, with normalisation of CSF pressure, or become associated with chronically raised CSF pressure [10]. Age-related cerebral tissue loss as well as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder are associated with enlargement of CSF spaces due to generalised brain atrophy and may result in the radiological appearance of hydrocephalus but are associated with normal CSF pressure and flow, so-called hydrocephalus ex vacuo [9, 11]. This is not an indication for surgical treatment [9].

Meningeal infections including TBM, cryptococcal meningitis and bacterial meningitis can impair CSF resorption at arachnoid granulations, resulting in communicating hydrocephalus [10, 12]. TBM, which is associated with thick basal exudate, can also result in non-communicating hydrocephalus [13]. TBM in the context of HIV infection appears to be associated with substantially increased morbidity and mortality compared with HIV non-infected patients [14, 15]. This might arise because of synergistic effects of HIV and tuberculosis in the CNS causing depressed monocyte and microglial mediated immunity and dysregulated cytokine production [1621]. Hydrocephalus in TBM frequently persists following successful antimicrobial treatment [22]. Conversely, the majority of HIV-infected patients with raised CSF pressures secondary to cryptococcal meningitis (typically communicating hydrocephalus) experience normalising of CSF pressure and resolution of hydrocephalus following successful antimicrobial therapy [10]. A small proportion does require temporary CSF diversion for initial acute hydrocephalus [23]. Mass lesions such as toxoplasmosis, PCNSL, metastases from HIV-associated non-CNS malignancy and tuberculoma can trigger the development of non-communicating hydrocephalus by occlusion of ventricular outflow pathways [24, 25]. In these instances, hydrocephalus resolution post-treatment is dependent on restoration of normal ventricular outflow pathway anatomy. IRIS affecting the CNS is defined by a transient worsening or development of new inflammatory lesions during immune reconstitution around infective foci and might also present with hydrocephalus secondary to meningitis or mass lesions [26, 27].

Epidemiology

As of 2015, it was estimated that 36.7 million people globally were living with HIV infection [28]. Of these, 19.0 million live in Eastern and Southern Africa [28]. HIV infection disproportionately affects certain vulnerable populations including intravenous substance misusers, sex workers and their clients, men who have sex with men and transgender people [28]. The risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease is estimated to be 20 times greater in HIV-infected patients compared with their HIV non-infected counterparts, an effect which is most pronounced in low-income populations [29, 30]. As such, one cadaveric study conducted in the Ivory Coast in 1991 found that 32% of in-hospital deaths of HIV-infected patients were a result of tuberculosis with TBM affecting 20% of these [31]. The increasing availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has seen a decline in the incidence of new opportunistic intracranial infections, PCNSL and reduced AIDS-related deaths [5, 32, 33]. However, with improved survival and ongoing HIV transmission, the global prevalence of HIV and the associated burden of chronic disease continues to rise [28].

The incidence of hydrocephalus associated with HIV infection is poorly quantified at present. Small studies comparing clinical and radiological characteristics of HIV-associated and HIV non-associated patients with conditions associated with hydrocephalus provide some information: HIV-associated TBM appears to be associated with lower rates of non-communicating hydrocephalus than HIV non-associated TBM [34], and in some studies, over 50% of patients with cryptococcal meningitis, which occurs almost exclusively in HIV-infected patients, have exhibited raised CSF pressures [10]. However, non-communicating hydrocephalus is uncommon in cryptococcal meningitis [10, 35]. It is also important to note that any other cause of hydrocephalus may also be seen in the HIV-infected population; hence, adults might suffer the ongoing effects of infant-onset or congenital hydrocephalus. This is estimated to affect 1.1 in 1000 infants and 32 per 10,000 births and may be due to anatomical abnormalities such as neural tube defects and Chiari malformations or arise secondary to perinatal insults such as intraventricular haemorrhage and bacterial meningitis [36]. In HIV non-infected high-income populations, intracranial haemorrhage and malignancy account for 45 and 30% of new cases of adult onset hydrocephalus, respectively [37]. A lack of dedicated epidemiological research concerning HIV-associated hydrocephalus makes data from these small studies difficult to generalise, and little is known about the distribution of non-infective causes of hydrocephalus associated with HIV.

Description of the intervention

A ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is a surgically implanted device that allows flow of fluid from the cerebral ventricles into the peritoneal cavity. It consists of a silicone ventricular catheter that is inserted through a single burr hole, using either image guidance or anatomical landmarks to locate the ventricle. The catheter is sometimes rifampicin and clindamycin or silver impregnated [38]. It is connected to a valve that is usually placed in the subgaleal space. The valve can be pressure or flow regulated and may contain an antisiphon device [39]. This is connected to a length of distal tubing that is tunnelled subcutaneously from the valve site to the level of the abdomen where it is inserted through the abdominal wall into the peritoneal cavity where the distal catheter tip sits.

A functioning VPS provides a permanent pathway for ventricular CSF outflow and allows for normalisation of CSF pressure in hydrocephalus. Common complications following successful VPS include shunt infection, ventriculitis, proximal catheter occlusion or migration, shunt fracture, over drainage and distal catheter occlusion [40]. In one US cohort, 21% of adults who underwent VPS between 1990 and 2000 suffered a complication within the first year and 26% required replacement or removal of the shunt during the study period [41]. One cohort of mostly paediatric patients who underwent VPS between 2004 and 2007 in Kenya, a low-middle-income country with high HIV prevalence, there was a 2-year cumulative malfunction rate of 35% with 59.8% having “poor outcome” and 8.5% mortality [4244]. However, follow-up was reported as incomplete and this might not therefore been an underestimate of the complication rate in such a setting.

Alternatives to VPS include ventriculoatrial shunting where the distal catheter tip is sited in the right cardiac atrium and ventriculopleural shunting where it is sited in the pleural cavity. In some instances, an external ventricular drain (EVD) may be sited in preference to a shunt [39]. For this, a ventricular catheter is placed and the distal tip externalised through the scalp and connected without a valve to a drain mounted at a specific height above the tragus of the ear. This allows gravity to limit CSF flow via the catheter below a desired pressure. However, this is only a temporary means of CSF diversion. For some cases of communicating hydrocephalus, it may be sufficient to drain CSF through serial lumbar puncture or a lumbar drain [39]. Lumbar drains may be externalised using a similar system to an EVD or tunnelled and have the distal tubing placed in the peritoneal cavity—a lumboperitoneal shunt [39]. In cases of non-communicating hydrocephalus, it is sometimes possible to surgically divide the lamina terminalis or endoscopically conduct a third ventriculostomy (ETV) to allow for flow of ventricular CSF to the subarachnoid space [13]. However, this procedure is challenging—particularly in TBM [13]—and requires significant expertise and equipment that may not be available in emergency or resource-limited settings.

Why it is important to do this review

A proportion of patients infected with HIV develop hydrocephalus as a complication of CNS opportunistic infections. As described above, infectious aetiologies of hydrocephalus are over-represented in HIV-infected patients and HIV directly impacts on the pathological processes in intracranial infection. The literature from HIV non-infected patient populations therefore cannot be generalised to those with HIV infection.

VPS can be immediately life-saving in acute hydrocephalus and may be the sole treatment option for patients who are dependent on CSF diversion following emergency EVD insertion and are not candidates for ETV. However, two of the most cited studies comparing VPS in HIV-infected patients with TBM to HIV non-infected counterparts demonstrated mortality rates in excess of 60% in HIV-infected patients [45, 46]. Small numbers of HIV-infected patients in these studies achieved good outcome following VPS [45, 46]. Better outcomes have been reported following VPS insertion for other causes of HIV-associated hydrocephalus [47, 48]. To determine if the existing literature is sufficient to inform selection of HIV-infected patients for VPS in clinical practice, it is necessary for a systematic review to be conducted.

Objectives

Our objectives were to compare post-VPS mortality, VPS infection, VPS malfunction and clinical outcome and rates of other complications at 1, 6 and 12 months between different aetiologies of HIV-associated hydrocephalus using quantitative meta-analysis and production of a narrative review. They would allow the identification of baseline patient characteristics which are predictive of good outcome following VPS in HIV infection.

Methods

This protocol was produced with reference to the PRISMA-P checklist (see Additional file 1).

Inclusion criteria

Types of studies

We will include the following study designs: randomised clinical trials (RCTs), one- and two-group cohort studies, case-control studies, interrupted time series and consecutive case series. Descriptive, non-comparative studies of relevant populations will be eligible for inclusion. Studies reporting data on a population with a subset of HIV-infected individuals will only be included if outcome data on the subpopulation of HIV-infected patients is reported.

Types of participants

All studies of patients aged 16 years or older who have undergone a VPS procedure and have a positive serological diagnosis of HIV infection or a detectible HIV viral load will be included, regardless of the presence of any other complicating CNS pathology.

Types of interventions

Studies of patients who have undergone a VPS procedure using any type of catheter, valve or insertion technique will be included.

Types of outcome measures

We will include studies of primary data that report measures of overall survival, AIDS-specific mortality or VPS failure. We define VPS failure in all patient groups as any complication requiring shunt removal or revision. Studies reporting perioperative complications of VPS will additionally be included for secondary analysis.

Outcomes

Our study’s primary outcome will be 1-year post-VPS survival with comparison between all identified aetiologies of hydrocephalus in HIV-infected patients treated with VPS. We define separate aetiologies as being different sites of anatomical abnormality, with congenital and acquired causes considered separate: subarachnoid haemorrhage, intraventricular haemorrhage and different suspected or proven pathogens for infectious causes. Secondary outcomes will be survival at 1 and 6 months andAIDS-specific mortality, VPS failure, rates of perioperative complications and measures of outcome using validated outcome measures [4951] at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year post-VPS insertion. For all measures, comparison will be made between aetiologies of hydrocephalus.

Search methods for the identification of studies

Scoping searches

Scoping searches have been undertaken to identify candidate studies and inform keyword selection for electronic searching [15, 4547].

Electronic searches

We will search the following electronic databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost), LILACS (BIREME), Research Registry (www.researchregistry.com), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and African Journals Online (AJOL). Grey literature searching will be performed using the OpenGREY database. There will be no date restrictions in electronic searches. Our search sensitivity has been ensured by confirming that candidate studies identified during scoping searches are included in the search yields. See Appendix 1 for full search strategies.

Searching other resources

We will examine the reference lists of included studies to identify any additional studies for inclusion. Experts in relevant fields will be consulted and asked to identify key studies. Any studies identified for consideration of inclusion by these consults that were not detected by our search will be documented in our final report. We will not hand search any conference proceedings or journals. Disagreement will be resolved through consensus discussion and/or consideration of a third author (GF).

Data extraction and management

Data will be extracted using standardised proformas (Appendix 2) and entered into review manager [52] by two authors (JL, NM).We will use the software package EndNote for reference management [53].

Data collection and analysis

Selection of studies

Two review authors (JL, NM) will independently screen all titles and abstracts yielded by the literature search. During screening, studies will be scrutinised against inclusion criteria. Those not meeting criteria will be excluded. For those which meet the criteria or for which it is impossible to tell if criteria are met on the basis of title and abstract the full manuscript will be sought and reviewed. Any subsequent exclusions will be documented.

Assessment of risk of bias in included studies

Each included study will be independently assessed for risk of bias by two study authors (JL, NM). Randomised studies will be assessed using the ‘Risk of bias’ tool from Chapter 8.5 of the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Intervention [54]. Non-randomised studies (NRS) will be assessed using the Canadian National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools “Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies” [55, 56]. Summary outcomes of these assessments will be presented.

Measures of effect

In the narrative review, we will summarise outcomes as reported by each included study separately. If data comparing outcome across different aetiologies of hydrocephalus exists, we will report it. If meta-analysis is performed, pooled odds ratios (OR) will be reported. The primary outcome of any RCTs comparing VPS with any other management strategy will be reported. If multiple trials of the same interventions report similar outcomes, meta-analysis will be conducted according to guidance by the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions [54].

Dealing with missing data

We will attempt to contact the authors of included studies electronically for any unreported details. If, following this, uncertainty remains, we will report available data and state missing data. Studies with missing mortality data will not be eligible for inclusion in meta-analysis.

Assessment of heterogeneity

On the basis of extracted data, studies will be compared for clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Where apparently homogenous studies report similar outcome measures at similar time points, the I 2 (%) and T 2 statistics will be calculated, with I 2 greater than 50% suggesting substantial heterogeneity. For estimation of statistical heterogeneity, we will use odds of mortality between aetiologies of HIV-associated hydrocephalus as the measure of effect.

Data synthesis

If substantial clinical, methodological or statistical heterogeneity is detected or if no comparative studies are included, we will not attempt meta-analysis and will present solely a narrative review. If homogenous comparative studies are identified, then meta-analysis of pooled mortality data will be conducted using the Peto method. OR at 12, 6 and 1 month post-VPS between pooled populations with different aetiologies of hydrocephalus will be compared. If greater than 10 homogenous studies are included for meta-analysis, meta-regression will be attempted. Covariables for this will include, where reported, age categories (16–24; 25–44; 45–59; ≥ 60), CD4+ cell count, time from presentation to VPS, initial Glasgow Coma Score [50], and shunt catheter type—either conventional, antibiotic or silver impregnated. Where not all variables are reported, regression will be conducted using the maximum covariables reported by all eligible studies. Where meta-analysis is performed, sensitivity analysis will be undertaken to determine the relative effects of inclusion of each individual study, as well as RCTs and non-randomised studies from different World Bank income categories: low-income, lower-middle-income, upper-middle-income and high-income economies. GRADEpro will be used to summarise strength of available data [57].

Protocol amendments

This is the original study protocol. Any subsequent protocol amendments will be published on the PROSPERO database of systematic reviews. Amendments to the protocol manuscript following peer review are documented (see Additional file 2).

Discussion

HIV infection and HIV-associated hydrocephalus disproportionately impact on patients from low-middle-income countries [28]. Unfortunately, it is believed that the neurosurgical management of CNS complications of HIV infection has received relatively little research attention, and consequently, guidelines for management to date have been based on low-quality evidence [58, 59]. As outcome following VPS in HIV appears to be somewhat dependent on population income, it is important that studies of outcome take into account population demographics and that the study of low-middle-income populations is urgently prioritised [41, 42]. This study will begin to address this need by summarising existing evidence to inform clinical practice in relevant populations where the data supports this. We also will define deficiencies in existing literature and to guide research direction towards meaningfully answering relevant questions.

Abbreviations

AIDS: 

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

ART: 

Antiretroviral therapy

CD4: 

Cluster of differentiation 4

CNS: 

Central nervous system

CSF: 

Cerebrospinal fluid

ETV: 

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy

EVD: 

External ventricular drain

HIV: 

Human immunodeficiency virus

IRIS: 

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

PCNSL: 

Primary central nervous system lymphoma

RCT: 

Randomised clinical trial

TBM: 

Tuberculous meningitis

VPS: 

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This protocol was produced as part of the third year of the MSc in Surgical Sciences or Edinburgh Surgical Sciences Qualification www.essq.rcsed.ac.uk.

Funding

This study has received no external funding.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

JJML designed the study and wrote the study protocol and is the protocol guarantor (in detail, made the initial conception of the study and proposal to Prof. Fieggen, conducted the background scoping searches, wrote every draft of the protocol, determined the study inclusion criteria, study outcomes, search strategy, risk of bias assessment, data extraction and handling protocols and statistical methods). NM did the critical appraisal of the study protocol (in detail, carried out the detection of typographic errors). GM made the critical appraisal of the study protocol (in detail, made the detection of typographic errors, advised on the non-inclusion of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in background, advised on AIDS-specific mortality and advised on appropriate measures of effect). GF is the study supervisor (in detail, suggested the initial reading for the scoping searches, is responsible for the institutional support, identified individuals for the study team and did the oversight of the study direction and scope. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Mr. James JM. Loan is an ECAT Clinical Lecturer in Neurosurgery at the University of Edinburgh and Honorary Specialty Registrar at the Institute of Neurosciences, Glasgow, UK. Dr. Ncedile Mankahla is a consultant neurosurgeon

in the Groote Schuur Hospital and Red Cross Children’s Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Prof. Graeme Meintjes is a professor in the Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, a principal investigator in the Clinical Infectious Diseases Research Initiative (CIDRI), an honorary clinical lecturer in Imperial College London, a SARChI chair of Lung Infection and Immunity in Poverty-Related Diseases in the Department of Medicine and a principal investigator/director of the South African Medical Research Council Clinical and Community HIV-TB Research Collaborating Centre (C2HTB). Prof. Graham Fieggen is a Helen and Morris Mauerberger professor and a head of the division in the University of Cape Town, head of the Clinical Department, Neurosurgery Groote Schuur Hospital, and a consultant paediatric neurosurgeon in the Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors consent for publication. No other participants were involved.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh
(2)
Institute of Neurosciences
(3)
Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory
(4)
University of Cape Town
(5)
Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital

References

  1. Buonaguro L, Tornesello ML, Buonaguro FM. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype distribution in the worldwide epidemic: pathogenetic and therapeutic implications. J Virol. 2007;81(19):10209–19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Marlink R, Kanki P, Thior I, Travers K, Eisen G, Siby T, et al. Reduced rate of disease development after HIV-2 infection as compared to HIV-1. Science. 1994;265(5178):1587–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sabin CA, Lundgren JD. The natural history of HIV infection. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2013;8(4):311–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Kumar P. Long term non-progressor (LTNP) HIV infection. Indian J Med Res. 2013;138(3):291–3.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Sacktor N. The epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurological disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Neuro-Oncol. 2002;8(Suppl 2):115–21.Google Scholar
  6. McArthur JC, Brew BJ, Nath A. Neurological complications of HIV infection. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(9):543–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Croucher A, Winston A. Neurological complications of HIV. HIV and AIDS. 2013;41(8):450–5.Google Scholar
  8. Price RW. Neurological complications of HIV infection. Lancet. 1996;348(9025):445–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenberg MS. Hydrocephalus—general aspects. In: Greenberg MS, editor. Handbook of neurosurgery. 8th ed. New York: Thieme; 2016. p. 394–413.Google Scholar
  10. Graybill JR, Sobel J, Saag M, van Der Horst C, Powderly W, Cloud G, et al. Diagnosis and management of increased intracranial pressure in patients with AIDS and cryptococcal meningitis. The NIAID Mycoses Study Group and AIDS Cooperative Treatment Groups. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(1):47–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Filippi CG, Ulug AM, Ryan E, Ferrando SJ, van Gorp W. Diffusion tensor imaging of patients with HIV and normal-appearing white matter on MR images of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(2):277–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vinnard C, Macgregor RR. Tuberculous meningitis in HIV-infected individuals. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2009;6(3):139–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Figaji AA, Fieggen AG, Peter JC. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in tuberculous meningitis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19(4):217–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Thwaites GE, Nguyen DB, Nguyen HD, Hoang TQ, Do TT, Nguyen TC, et al. Dexamethasone for the treatment of tuberculous meningitis in adolescents and adults. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1741–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Clemente Morgado T, Kinsky M, Carrara H, Rothemeyer S, Semple P. Prognostic value of computed tomography-evident cerebral infarcts in adult patients with tuberculous meningitis and hydrocephalus treated with an external ventricular drain. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(6):e255–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Silver RF, Li Q, Ellner JJ. Expression of virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within human monocytes: virulence correlates with intracellular growth and induction of tumor necrosis factor alpha but not with evasion of lymphocyte-dependent monocyte effector functions. Infect Immun. 1998;66(3):1190–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Sanduzzi A, Fraziano M, Mariani F. Monocytes/macrophages in HIV infection and tuberculosis. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2001;15(3):294–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jordan CA, Watkins BA, Kufta C, Dubois-Dalcq M. Infection of brain microglial cells by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is CD4 dependent. J Virol. 1991;65(2):736–42.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Peterson PK, Gekker G, Hu S, Sheng WS, Anderson WR, Ulevitch RJ, et al. CD14 receptor-mediated uptake of nonopsonized mycobacterium tuberculosis by human microglia. Infect Immun. 1995;63(4):1598–602.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Wallis RS, Vjecha M, Amir-Tahmasseb M, Okwera A, Byekwaso F, Nyole S, et al. Influence of tuberculosis on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1): enhanced cytokine expression and elevated beta 2-microglobulin in HIV-1-associated tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 1993;167(1):43–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Curto M, Reali C, Palmieri G, Scintu F, Schivo ML, Sogos V, et al. Inhibition of cytokines expression in human microglia infected by virulent and non-virulent mycobacteria. Neurochem Int. 2004;44(6):381–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Newman PK, Cumming WJ, Foster JB. Hydrocephalus and tuberculous meningitis in adults. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980;43(2):188–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Pappas PG. Managing cryptococcal meningitis is about handling the pressure. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(3):480–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Offiah CE, Turnbull IW. The imaging appearances of intracranial CNS infections in adult HIV and AIDS patients. Clin Radiol. 2006;61(5):393–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mankahla NR, Rothemeyer SJ. Neurosurgical complications of HIV. Continuing Med Educ. 2013;31(3):112–3.Google Scholar
  26. Tan K, Roda R, Ostrow L, McArthur J, Nath A. PML-IRIS in patients with HIV infection: clinical manifestations and treatment with steroids. Neurology. 2009;72(17):1458–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Marais S, Scholtz P, Pepper DJ, Meintjes G, Wilkinson RJ, Candy S. Neuroradiological features of the tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14(2):188–96.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Global AIDS update. Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2016.Google Scholar
  29. Van TT, Farrar J. Tuberculous meningitis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(3):195–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Figueroa-Munoz JI, Ramon-Pardo P. Tuberculosis control in vulnerable groups. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(9):733–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lucas SB, Hounnou A, Peacock C, Beaumel A, Djomand G, N'Gbichi JM, et al. The mortality and pathology of HIV infection in a west African city. AIDS. 1993;7(12):1569–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. BL MR, Drouin O, Bartlett G, Nguyen Q, Low A, Gavriilidis G, et al. Incidence and prevalence of opportunistic and other infections and the impact of antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected children in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(12):1586–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. UNAIDS. South Africa HIV and AIDS Estimates 2015. 2015. [updated 2015; cited 2016 8 October 2016]. Available from: http://www.unaids.org/en/regionscountries/countries/southafrica/.
  34. Marais S, Pepper DJ, Marais BJ, Torok ME. HIV-associated tuberculous meningitis—diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2010;90(6):367–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Denning DW, Armstrong RW, Lewis BH, Stevens DA. Elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressures in patients with cryptococcal meningitis and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Med. 1991;91(3):267–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tully HM, Dobyns WB. Infantile hydrocephalus: a review of epidemiology, classification and causes. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57(8):359–68.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Bir SC, Patra DP, Maiti TK, Sun H, Guthikonda B, Notarianni C, et al. Epidemiology of adult-onset hydrocephalus: institutional experience with 2001 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;41(3):E5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jenkinson MD, Gamble C, Hartley JC, Hickey H, Hughes D, Blundell M, et al. The British antibiotic and silver-impregnated catheters for ventriculoperitoneal shunts multi-centre randomised controlled trial (the BASICS trial): study protocol. Trials. 2014;15:4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Greenberg MS. Treatment of hydrocephalus. In: Greenberg MS, editor. Handbook of neurosurgery. 8th ed. New York: Thieme; 2016. p. 414–37.Google Scholar
  40. Patwardhan RV, Nanda A. Implanted ventricular shunts in the United States: the billion-dollar-a-year cost of hydrocephalus treatment. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(1):139–44. discussion 44-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu Y, Green NL, Wrensch MR, Zhao S, Gupta N. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in California: 1990 to 2000. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):557–62. discussion 62-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Gathura E, Poenaru D, Bransford R, Albright AL. Outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion in sub-Saharan Africa. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;6(4):329–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Bank TW. World Bank Country and Lending Groups 2017 [updated 2017 Fiscal year.Google Scholar
  44. UNAIDS. Kenya HIV and AIDS estimates 2015. 2015. [updated 2015; cited 22 October 2016]. Available from: http://www.unaids.org/en/regionscountries/countries/kenya/.
  45. Sharma RM, Pruthi N, Arimappamagan A, Somanna S, Devi BI, Pandey P. Tubercular meningitis with hydrocephalus with HIV co-infection: role of cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(5):1087–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Nadvi SS, Nathoo N, Annamalai K, van Dellen JR, Bhigjee AI. Role of cerebrospinal fluid shunting for human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients with tuberculous meningitis and hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(3):644–9. discussion 9-50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Bach MC, Tally PW, Godofsky EW. Use of cerebrospinal fluid shunts in patients having acquired immunodeficiency syndrome with cryptococcal meningitis and uncontrollable intracranial hypertension. Neurosurgery. 1997;41(6):1280–2. discussion 2-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Williams MA, Rigamonti D. The use of ventriculoperitoneal shunts for uncontrollable intracranial hypertension without ventriculomegally secondary to HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Surg Neurol. 2005;63(6):529–31. discussion 31-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: interim results. UK-TIA Study Group. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988;296(6618):316-20.Google Scholar
  50. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1(7905):480–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. RevMan. Review Manager. In: Collaboration TC, editor. 5.0 ed. Copenhagen: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.Google Scholar
  53. Reuters T. EndNote X7. 2016.Google Scholar
  54. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.Google Scholar
  55. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. ON: McMaster University: ON: McMaster University; 2008 [updated 13 April 2010]. Available from: http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/14.
  56. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). 2003;7(27):iii–x.Google Scholar
  57. GRADEpro. McMaster University 2016. p. [Computer program on www.gradepro.org].
  58. Portegies P, Solod L, Cinque P, Chaudhuri A, Begovac J, Everall I, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neurological complications of HIV infection. Eur J Neurol. 2004;11(5):297–304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Modi M, Mochan A, Modi G. Management of HIV-associated focal brain lesions in developing countries. QJM. 2004;97(7):413–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement