- Erratum
- Open Access
- Published:
Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches
Systematic Reviews volume 4, Article number: 59 (2015)
- The original article was published in Systematic Reviews 2015 4:5
Erratum
Following publication of our article [1], it has come to our attention that two of the formulae in Table 1 were incorrect. The formulae for the measures of precision and burden have been corrected (Table 1). We are publishing this erratum to update these formulae to the following:
Precision = \( \frac{TP}{TP+FP} \)
Burden = \( \frac{t{p}^T+t{n}^T+f{p}^T+t{p}^U+f{p}^U}{N} \)
References
- 1.
O’Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, Miwa M, Ananiadou S. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Systematic Rev. 2015;4:5.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J. et al. Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev 4, 59 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0031-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
