- Erratum
- Open Access
- Published:
Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches
Systematic Reviews volume 4, Article number: 59 (2015)
- The original article was published in Systematic Reviews 2015 4:5
Erratum
Following publication of our article [1], it has come to our attention that two of the formulae in Table 1 were incorrect. The formulae for the measures of precision and burden have been corrected (Table 1). We are publishing this erratum to update these formulae to the following:
Precision = \( \frac{TP}{TP+FP} \)
Burden = \( \frac{t{p}^T+t{n}^T+f{p}^T+t{p}^U+f{p}^U}{N} \)
References
- 1.
O’Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, Miwa M, Ananiadou S. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Systematic Rev. 2015;4:5.
Author information
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J. et al. Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev 4, 59 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0031-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.