Skip to main content

Table 1 The general characteristics of the included studies

From: Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapy combined with eltrombopag for severe aplastic anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Sudy design

Types of patients/years old

Participants

Number of case

Intervention

Gender (male/female)/case

Median age (range)/year

Dose of EPAG

EPAG duration month

Median follow-up time (range) /month

EPAG+IST

IST

EPAG+IST

IST

EPAG+IST

IST

EPAG+IST

IST

Introduce

Maximum

EPAG+IST

IST

Assi [26]

2018

Cohort study

≥ 18

38

21

17

EPAG +hATG+CsA

hATG+CsA

11/10

8/9

60 (19–84)

53 (24–80)

50 mg/day

150 mg/day

≥ 6

21 (3-49)

Chai [27]

2021

Cohort study

Elderly

35

24

11

EPAG +rATG+CsA

rATG+CsA

15/9

5/6

66.5 (61–81)

65 (61–72)

25 mg/day

75 mg/day

3 or 6

–

–

De Latour [33]

2022

RCT

Unlimited

197

96

101

EPAG +hATG+CsA

hATG+CsA

56/40

52/49

55 (16–77)

52 (15–81)

150 mg/day

6

23 (19–24)

24 (23–24)

Fang [28]

2021

Cohort study

< 18

57

18

39

EPAG +pATG+CsA

pATG+CsA

10/8

21/18

6.5 (1.2–12.5)

7 (1.6–13.5)

1 mg/kg/day

50 mg/day

6

31 (19–40)

69 (41–103)

Fang [36]

2023

RCT

Unlimited

90

45

45

EPAG +rATG+CsA

rATG+CsA

23/22

25/20

36 (15–60)

36 (15–59)

25 mg/day

75 mg/day

≥ 4

–

–

Goronkova [38]

2023

RCT

< 18

98

49

49

EPAG +hATG+CsA

hATG+CsA

35/14

30/19

10.5 (2–17.7)

8.7 (2.1–16.8)

2 mg/kg/day

3 or 6

26 (1–55)

3 or 6

Groarke [29]

2021

Cohort study

< 18

127

40

87

EPAG +hATG+CsA

hATG+CsA

23/17

51/36

13 (3–17)

11 (2–17)

≥ 12 years:150 mg/day

6–11 years:75 mg/day

2–5 years:25 mg/kg/day

≥ 3

47

80

Hu [37]

2022

Cohort study

Unlimited

111

37

74

EPAG +r/pATG+CsA

r/pATG+CsA

24/13

34/40

33 (10-68)

33 (10–68)

< 12 years:25 mg/day

≥ 12 years:50–75 mg/day

150mg/d

–

–

–

Jie [30]

2021

Cohort study

< 18

42

14

28

EPAG +rATG+CsA

rATG+CsA

8/6

14/15

7 (2–15.5)

8 (4–14)

≥ 6 years:75 mg/day

2–6 years:2.5 mg/kg/day

≥ 6

28 (25–32)

28.5 (1–88)

Jin [34]

2022

Cohort study

≥ 18

121

54

67

EPAG +rATG+CsA

rATG+CsA

28/26

30/37

39 (18–74)

40 (18–66)

25 mg/day

75 mg/day

–

14 (1–79)

16 (1–79)

Lesmana [31]

2021

Cohort study

< 18

25

9

16

EPAG +hATG+CsA

hATG+CsA

7/2

4/12

11 (4–18)

11.5 (1–17)

< 6 years:25 mg/day 6–18 years:50 mg/day

150 mg/day

6

15 (11–36)

86 (4–132)

Patel [35]

2022

Cohort study

Unlimited

280

178

102

EPAG +hATG+CsA

hATG+CsA

–

–

–

–

150 mg/day

3 or 6

48.7 (2.8–99.2)

87.8 (2.9–190.8)

Zaimoku [8]

2022

Cohort study

Unlimited

416

176

240

EPAG +hATG+CsA

hATG+CsA

87/89

141/99

32 (3–82)

30 (2-82)

> 11 years:150 mg/day

6–11 years:75 mg/day

2–5 years:2.5 mg/kg/day

6

–

–

Zhang [32]

2022

Cohort study

< 18

63

31

32

EPAG +rATG+CsA

rATG+CsA

16/15

16/16

12 (8–16)

≥ 27 kg:50 mg/day

< 27 kg:1.5 mg/kg/day

3.33–22.30

–

–

Zhao [39]

2023

Cohort study

< 18

60

15

45

EPAG +r/pATG+CsA

r/pATG+CsA

10/5

26/19

13 (4–18)

13(7-17)

2.5 mg/kg/day

50 mg/day

0.1–51

19 (7–34)

74 (1–119)

Shinn [40]

2023

Cohort study

≥ 18

82

48

34

EPAG +hATG+CsA

hATG+CsA

25/23

18/16

54 (20–80)

39.5 (18–76)

150 mg/day

–

18 (0.8–70)

49 (0.4–93)

  1. IST immunosuppressive therapy, EPAG eltrombopag, RCT randomized controlled trial, hATG horse antityhymocyte globulin, rATG rabbit antityhymocyte globulin, pATG pig antityhymocyte globulin, CsA cyclosporin A