Skip to main content

Table 7 CMO configuration 5

From: Community mobilisation approaches to preventing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review

 

Evidence

Context

Coalition with a mix of expertise (policy, social science and research stakeholders) and community members

Mechanism triggered

(1) Icelandic Prevention Model [50]

(2) Community Prevention and Wellness Initiative (CPWI) [53]

(3) Communities that Care Australia [63]

(4) TOGETHER! Communities for Drug Free Youth [69]

(5) New Directions (2005) [20]

(6) Project Freedom Lawrence (2004) [72]

(7) PROSPER (2007) [76]

(8) The Youth Community Coalition (YC2) (2011) [82]

Mechanism not triggered

(1) Communities that Care in the Netherlands [64]

(2) Red de Coaliciones Comunitarias de Mexico (The Network of Community Coalitions in Mexico) [79]

(3) Connect to Protect (C2P) Thailand [54]

(4) Minority Youth Health Project [86]

No information on coalition configuration

(1) Communities that Care Scottish Pilot [68]

(2) Icelandic Prevention Model Chile [51]

(3) Icelandic Prevention Model Lithuania [52]

(4) Kentucky Initiatives for Prevention (2007) [71]

(5) The Gloucester Prevention Network (1997) [83]

Mechanism(s)

Empowerment from within the community and knowledge and ability (leverage) to enact change and collaborate across society

Outcome

Creating shifts in the social environment towards prevention of adolescent MRB

  1. The table shows an example CMO configuration with a list of interventions that provide supporting or contrasting evidence of that configuration