Table 6 CMO configuration 4

Context

Using population data to establish community readiness, make decisions and track progress

Mechanism triggered

(1) Icelandic Prevention Model [22]

(2) Icelandic Prevention Model delivered in Chile [51]

(3) Icelandic Prevention Model delivered in Lithuania [52]

(4) Community Prevention and Wellness Initiative (CPWI) [53]

(5) Communities that Care Australia [63]

(6) TOGETHER! Communities for Drug Free Youth [69]

(7) New Directions (2005) [20]

(8) Project Freedom (Wichita) [74]

(9) Communities that Care (CYDS) (2009) [59]

(10) Communities that Care Pennsylvania [55]

(11) Communities that Care (The Netherlands) [64]

Mechanism not triggered

(1) Connect to Protect (C2P) Thailand [54]

(2) Red de Coaliciones Comunitarias de Mexico (The Network of Community Coalitions in Mexico) [79]

(3) Minority Youth Health Project [86]

(4) Communities that Care (Scottish Pilot) [68]

(5) Communities that Care (UK) [67]

(6) Kentucky Initiatives for Prevention (2007) [71]

(7) PRSOPER [76]

(8) Minority Youth Health Project [80]

(9) The Youth Community Coalition [82]

(10) The Gloucester Prevention Network (1997) [83]

Mechanism

Local knowledge of the community, flexibility to adapt to the data, motivation to continue by seeing the impacts and being involved in data analysis.

Outcome

Changes in the social environment leading to reductions in adolescent MRB.