Skip to main content

Table 1 Background information of included studies

From: Evaluation of the design and structure of electronic medication labels to improve patient health knowledge and safety: a systematic review

Study ID

Country

Study design

Recruitment method

Participants

Chan 2013 [21]

Hong Kong

Non-randomized experimental study

Convenience sampling and voluntary participation

160

Bhansali 2016 [18]

USA

Cross-sectional, randomized between and within subjects experimental design

Convenience sampling

249

You 2011 [22]

USA

A comparative study, secondary analysis of a 3-arm clinical trial

Clinic patients

132

McCarthy 2013 [23]

USA

Randomized controlled trial

Convenience sampling

87

Sahm 2012 [24]

Ireland

Cross-sectional study

Clinic patients

94

Tong 2018 [19]

Australia

Qualitative research, cohort study

Voluntary

50

Tai 2016 [25]

USA

Randomized controlled trial

Voluntary

172

Friedman 1997 [20]

USA

Randomized controlled trial

Door-to-door interviews

2260

Law 2010 [26]

USA

Structured interview design

Convenience sampling

628 (444 patients, 115 pharmacists, 69 physicians)

Dowse 2005 [27]

South Africa

Randomized controlled trial

Clinic patients

87

Davis 2009 [9]

USA

Cross-sectional study

Clinic patients

359

Yin 2017 [28]

USA

Randomized controlled trial

Clinic patients

491

Wolf 2016 [29]

USA

Randomized controlled trial

Clinic patients

845

Malhotra 2019 [30]

Singapore

Randomized controlled trial

Survey

1414