PRISMA items (number) | Subgroups of items & N of papers reporting evidence | Narrative summary of extracted data |
---|---|---|
(1)Title | N = 2/6 | • Transition to and out of living mode must be recognized in the title, responsible parties must be informed [3] • Additional information regarding the indication of an update or “living” SR approach must be provided in the title [4] |
(2)Abstract | N = 1/6 | • Abstract must indicate identification as an LSR; updated search results must be reported [3] |
Introduction | (3) Rationale (N = 1/6) | • Rational for the LSR approach: Previous updates must be mentioned [3] |
(4) Objective (N = 1/6) | • Previously performed updates must be mentioned [3] | |
Methods | (5) Eligibility criteria (N = 1/6) | • Remain the same as for standard SRs [3] |
(6) Information sources (N = 1/6) | • Accurate reporting is necessary, including the PRISMA flow diagram [3] | |
(7) Search strategy (N = 1/6) | • Must be specified and reported in the protocol [3] | |
(8) Selection process (N = 1/6) | • Report whether any new citations retrieved by the monthly searches was immediately screened; using technical support tools [3] | |
(9) Data collection process (N = 0/6)a | ||
(10) Data items (N = 0/6)a | ||
(11) Study risk of bias assessment (N = 1/6) | • Report the use of machine learning and automated structured data extraction tools [3] | |
(12) Effect measure (N = 0/6)a | ||
(13) Synthesis methods (N = 2/6) | • Specify statistical methods used to correct type 1 and 2 errors [27] • Enables for data synthesis [3] | |
(14) Reporting bias assessment (N = 0/6)a | ||
(15) Certainty assessment (N = 0/6)a | ||
Results | (16) Study selection (N = 1/6) | • Record in detail the search results, a spreadsheet is recommended. Present either the results of the base and updates separately, all combined or only the updated versions combined [11] |
(17) Study characteristics (N = 0/6)a | ||
(18) Present risk of bias in studies (N = 0/6)a | ||
(19) Present results of individual studies (N = 0/6)a | ||
(20) Results of synthesis (N = 0/6)a | ||
(21) Reporting bias (N = 0/6)a | ||
(22) Certainty of evidence (N = 0/6)a | ||
Discussion (23) | (23a) General interpretation (N = 0/6)a | |
(23bc) Limitations (N = 0/6)a | ||
(23d) Implications for practice (N = 0/6)a | ||
Registration and protocol (24) | N = 3/6 | • Justify the use of the “living” format in their protocol and mention pre-established criteria to abandon the “living” format for the conventional method [27] • Based on SR protocol [29] and the use of a template on how to create protocol [3] |
Support and funding (25) | N = 0/6a | |
Competing interests (26) | N = 1/6 | • Role of each work group member and their COI should be transparent [21] |
Availability of data & material (27) | N = 0/6a |