Skip to main content

Table 6 Literature searches, characteristics of trials with extractable data for meta-analysis

From: Efficacy of homoeopathic treatment: Systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled homoeopathy trials for any indication

 

Linde (1997) [6]

Linde (1998) [7]

Cucherat (2000) [8]

Shang (2005) [9]

Mathie (2014) [10]

Mathie (2017) [11]

N full-text records assessed for eligibility

No data

No data

150

156

348

359

N trials

 Assessed for eligibility

186

No data

118

No data

No data

No data

 Eligible for systematic review

119

31

17

110

32

75

 Extractable data for meta-analysis

N = 89

N = 18

N = 17

N = 110

N = 22

N = 54

Year range for trial publication

1943–1995

1980–1997

1980–1998

1960–2003

1994–2011

1976–2014

Sample size of trials

 Total

9283

1019

2480

12,879

1335

5739

 Mean

149

38

133

117

33

101

 Median

60

45

97

65

57

64

 Interquartile range

39–120

30–74

53–237

37–104

40–71

39–131

 Total range

5–1270

10–175

28–478

10–1573

23–175

18–478

N countries

13

12

No data

No data

11

15

Publication language

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

 English

35

39.3%

16

88.9%

9

52.9%

57

51.8%

21

95.5%

37

68.5%

 French

25

28.1%

0

0.0%

4

23.5%

22

20.0%

0

0.0%

2

3.7%

 German

26

29.2%

1

5.6%

4

23.5%

28

25.5%

1

4.5%

13

24.1%

 Other

3

3.4%

1

5.6%

0

0.0%

3

2.7%

0

0.0%

2

3.7%

 Total

89

100.0%

18

100.0%

17

100.0%

110

100.0%

22

100.0%

54

100.0%