Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk of bias and concern regarding applicability for studies of multivariable prediction models of caries increment

From: Multivariable prediction models of caries increment: a systematic review and critical appraisal

Study

First author, year of publication

[reference]

ROBa

Concern regarding applicabilitya

Overallb

Participants

Predictors

Outcomes

Analysis

Participants

Predictors

Outcomes

ROB

Applicability

Studies of model development

    Angulo, 1995 [13]

 − 

 + 

 − 

 − 

?

 + 

 + 

 − 

?

    Demers, 1992 [14]

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Disney, 1992 [15]

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Fontana, 2011 [16]

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Gao, 2010 [17]

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Hänsel Petersson, 2002 [18]

 + 

 + 

?

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Pang, 2021 [19]

?

 + 

 − 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Powell, 1991 [21]

?

?

 − 

 − 

 + 

?

 + 

 − 

?

    Ritter, 2016 [22]

 + 

 − 

?

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Sánchez-García, 2011 [23]

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Sánchez-Pérez, 2009 [20]

 + 

 + 

?

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

Studies of model validation

    Beck, 1992 [24]

 + 

 + 

?

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Birpou, 2019 [25]

 + 

 + 

 − 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Campus, 2012 [26]

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Christian, 2020 [27]

 + 

 + 

 − 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Dolic, 2020 [28]

 − 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Gao, 2013 [29]

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Hayes, 2017 [33]

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Hänsel Petersson, 2015 [30]

 + 

 + 

?

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Hänsel Petersson, 2010 [31]

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Holgerson, 2009 [32]

 + 

 + 

 − 

 − 

 + 

 + 

 + 

 − 

 + 

    Pang, 2021 [19]

?

 + 

 − 

?

 + 

?

 + 

 − 

?

  1. Assessment according to PROBAST [6]: “ + ” indicates low ROB or low concern regarding applicability; “ − ” indicates high ROB or high concern regarding applicability; “?” indicates unclear ROB or unclear concern regarding applicability
  2. aEach domain of ROB/concern regarding applicability is based on responses of respective items (Additional file 6) as follows: if all items are answered with “yes”, the domain is at low ROB/concern regarding applicability. If in at least one item, the response is “unclear” and the rest of the items are “Yes”, the ROB/concern regarding applicability is unclear. If the response is “no” in at least one item, regardless of other item responses the domain is at high ROB/concern regarding applicability
  3. bOverall assessment is expressed as follows: low ROB/concern regarding applicability if all domains are assessed low ROB/concern regarding applicability; high ROB/concern regarding applicability in case at least one domain is assessed high ROB/concern regarding applicability; if the risk is unclear in at least one domain and all other domains are low ROB/concern regarding applicability, final assessment remains unclear
  4. Abbreviations: ROB risk of bias, PROBAST Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool