Skip to main content

Table 2 Study quality and risk of bias assessment using Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials

From: The effect of whole egg consumption on weight and body composition in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Author, publication year

Randomization process

Deviations from the intended interventions (effect of assignment to intervention)

Deviations from the intended interventions (effect adhering to intervention)

Missing outcome data

Measurement of the outcome

Selection of the reported result

Overall

Daly et al. 2022 [60]

Some concern

Some concern

low

Low

high

Some concern

high

Njike et al. 2021 [61]

low

Some concern

low

low

low

low

Some concern

Keogh et al. (2020) [40]

Some concern

Some concern

low

low

high

Some concern

High

Maki et al. (2020) [42]

Some concern

Some concern

low

Low

high

Some concern

High

Shakoor et al. (2020) [48]

Some concern

Some concern

low

low

high

Some concern

High

DiBella et al (2020) [35]

Some concern

Some concern

low

low

high

Some concern

High

Aljohi et al. (2019) [32]

Some concern

Some concern

low

low

high

Some concern

High

Fuller et al. (2018) [37]

Some concern

low

low

low

high

Some concern

High

Missimer et al. (2017) [43]

Some concern

Some concern

low

low

low

Some concern

Some concern

Dimarco et al. (2017) [36]

Some concern

Some concern

low

Low

high

Some concern

Some concern

Fuller et al. (2016) [38]

low

low

low

low

low

low

Low

Njike et al. (2016) [22]

Some concern

low

low

low

high

Some concern

High

Clayton et al. (2015) [34]

Some concern

Some concern

low

low

high

low

High

Katz et al. (2015) [23]

Some concern

low

low

low

high

low

High

Ballesteros et al. (2015) [33]

Some concern

Some concern

low

low

low

Some concern

Some concern

Burns-Whitmore et al. (2014) [51]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

Low

High

Some concern

High

Rueda & Pramod Khosla (2013) [46]

Some concern

Some concern

low

low

high

Some concern

High

Putadechakum et al. (2013) [45]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

low

high

Some concern

High

Techakriengkrai et al. (2012) [52]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

Low

High

Some concern

High

Pearce et al. (2011) [44]

Some concern

Some concern

low

Low

high

Some concern

High

Vislocky et al. (2009) [49]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

low

high

Some concern

High

Harman et al. (2008) [50]

Some concern

Some concern

low

low

high

Some concern

High

Vander Wal et al. (2008) [58]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

Low

High

Some concern

High

Katz et al. (2005) [39]

Some concern

Some concern

low

low

low

Some concern

Some concern

Tannock et al. (2005) [53]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

Low

High

Some concern

High

Chakrabarty et al. (2004) [54]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

Low

High

Some concern

High

Chakrabarty et al. (2002) [55]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

Low

High

Some concern

High

Schnohr et al. (1994) [56]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

Low

High

Some concern

High

Edington et al. (1987) [57]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

Low

High

Some concern

High

Sacks et al. (1984) [47]

Some concern

low

low

low

low

low

Some concern

Flaim et al. (1981) [59]

Some concern

Some concern

Low

Low

High

Some concern

High