Skip to main content

Table 1 Included studies’ characteristics and summary statistics

From: HPV self-sampling versus healthcare provider collection on the effect of cervical cancer screening uptake and costs in LMIC: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Setting

Participants

Method of randomization

Intervention/control

Uptake HPV self-sampling

Uptake healthcare provider screening

Cost outcome

Arrossi 2015 [26]

Urban and rural areas in Argentina

6013 women from age 30 and above

Cluster

1. HPV self-sampling (cervical brush Qiagen)

2. Cytology and HPV healthcare provider collected sample

2552/3049 (83.7%)

599/2964 (20.2%)

None provided

Castle 2019 [24]

Town of Maringa in Brazil

483 women. Age 25–64

Cluster

1. HPV self-sampling (brush “just for me”)

2. Cytology

3. A choice between 1 & 2

HPV cobas analysis

161/161 (100%)

96/160 (60.0%)

None provided

Gizaw 2019 [21]

Butajira region, Ethiopia. Urban and rural

Women included in the Butajira Health and Demographic Surveillance platform between age 30 and 49

Cluster

1. HPV self-sampling (Evalyn brush)

2. VIA

1020/1213 (84.1%)

575/1143 (50.5%)

Running costs

- Intervention and control arm US $267.50/month (community health worker salary)

- Control arm and HPV-positive women: US $200.62/month (screening nurse salary)

- Participant’s travel allowance US $6.69/person

Lazcano 2011 [20]

Rural Mexico

21,742 women. Age 25–64

Single

1. HPV self-sampling (Diegene conical swab)

2. Pap smear

Hybrid capture analysis

9202/9371 (98.2)

9761/10,057 (97.1)

None provided

Modibbo 2017 [25]

Semi-urban districts of Abuja, Nigeria

400 women. Age 30–65

Single

1. HPV self-sampling

2. Health provider collected HPV sample

Dry flocked swab

GP5 + /6 + PCR-EIA system with LMNX genotyping

185/200 (92.5)

113/200 (56.5%)

None provided

Moses 2015 [22]

Mezei 2018 [23]

Kisenyi district (urban), Kampala, Uganda

500 participants. Age 30–65

Single

1. HPV vaginal self-collection (Dacron swab)

2. VIA

248/250 (99.2%)

121/250 (48.4%)

Start-up costs

- Training of health worker + community campaign US $6.58

- Lab equipment is included in lab cost

Running costs

- Healthcare workers’ time cost/woman screened. Intervention: US $5.50, control: US $8.25

- Time spent by women (transportation, waiting, procedure): intervention: 25 min, control: 180 min + 30 min with cryotherapy

- Time cost for women: HPV self-collection US $0.21. VIA screen US $1.53

- Material pr. test intervention: US $6.70. Control: US $0.79

Laboratory cost: per HPV test: US $0.69

- Midwife costs (VIA + /cryotherapy) US $14.26 (VIA +). US $5.67 (VIA −)