Skip to main content

Table 1 Protocol characteristics comparison between published protocols and unpublished protocols (N = 397)

From: Factors associated with successful publication for systematic review protocol registration: an analysis of 397 registered protocols

Protocol’s characteristics

Total

( N = 397)

Published protocols

( N = 244)

Unpublished protocols

( N = 153)

p -value

Information of corresponding author

 Scopus’s h-index of corresponding author

0.118c

  Value

8 (14.5)

9.5 (15.5)

5 (3.0)

 

 Corresponding author based in developed countries

0.019a

  Yes

320 (80.6)

206 (84.4)

114 (74.5)

 

  No

77 (19.4)

38 (15.6)

39 (25.5)

 

 Corresponding author based in English-speaking countries

0.006a

  Yes

237 (59.7)

159 (65.2)

78 (51.0)

 

  No

160 (40.3)

85 (34.8)

75 (49.0)

 

 Corresponding author is the first author

0.278a

  Yes

301 (75.8)

180 (73.8)

121 (79.1)

 

  No

96 (24.2)

64 (26.2)

32 (20.9)

 

 Country of corresponding authors

0.033b

  UK

79 (19.9)

58 (23.8)

21 (13.7)

 

  Australia

62 (15.6)

44 (18.0)

18 (11.8)

 

  Canada

46 (11.6)

28 (11.5)

18 (11.8)

 

  USA

47 (11.8)

26 (10.7)

21 (13.7)

 

  China

24 (6.0)

14 (5.7)

10 (6.5)

 

  Others

139 (35.0)

74 (30.3)

65 (42.5)

 

 Other characteristics

 Number of authors registered in protocols

0.333c

  Value

5 (3)

5 (3)

4 (3)

 

 External co-worker

0.909a

  Yes

114 (28.7)

71 (29.1)

43 (28.1)

 

  No

283 (71.3)

173 (70.9)

110 (71.9)

 

 Registered database

0.186b

  Cochrane only

86 (21.7)

49 (20.1)

37 (24.2)

 

  PROSPERO only

100 (25.2)

72 (29.5)

28 (18.3)

 

  JBI only

51 (12.8)

28 (11.5)

23 (15.0)

 

  SJR

16 (4.0)

10 (4.1)

6 (3.9)

 

  Others

23 (5.8)

12 (4.9)

11 (7.2)

 

  Duo register (a)

121 (30.5)

73 (29.9)

48 (31.4)

 

 Study funding

0.029b

  No funding support

180 (45.4)

104 (42.6)

76 (49.7)

 

  Internal fund only

74 (18.6)

40 (16.4)

34 (22.2)

 

  Having external fund (with/without internal fund)

143 (36.0)

100 (41.0)

43 (28.1)

 

 Protocol was updated

0.033a

  Yes

118 (29.7)

82 (33.6)

36 (23.5)

 

  No

279 (70.3)

162 (66.4)

117 (76.5)

 

 Type of systematic review

0.667b

  Effectiveness

311 (78.3)

191 (78.3)

120 (78.4)

 

  Experiential or qualitative

22 (5.5)

12 (4.9)

10 (6.5)

 

  Etiology or risk

21 (5.3)

11 (4.5)

10 (6.5)

 

  Diagnostic test accuracy

16 (4.0)

11 (4.5)

5 (3.3)

 

  Others

27 (6.8)

19 (7.8)

8 (5.2)

 
  1. Statistical analysis tests: a, Fisher’s exact test. b, chi-square test. c, Mann-Whitney U-test.
  2. Descriptive information was reported as a, N (%) and b, median (IQR).
  3. aOne-hundred twenty-one duo-registered protocols were all registered in PROSPERO, along with another database: Cochrane (14), JBI (46), SJR (46), others (15)