Skip to main content

Table 2 Examples of review aims

From: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family

Type of approach

Aim

Scoping review

To report in detail the methodology employed to identify relevant theories and provide a list of agreed criteria for judging the quality of theories (Davis et al. 2015) [41]

To document and describe the evidence base relating to stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews and to use this evidence to describe how stakeholders have been involved in systematic reviews (Pollock 2018) [42]

Mapping review

A mapping review of research on gambling harm in three regulatory environments (Baxter et al. 2019) [43]

EGMs

To identify what has been published on micronutrients and depression and identify gaps in the evidence and collections suitable for meta-analysis. (Campisi et al. 2020)

To identify intergenerational interventions and the social and mental wellbeing outcomes that have been measured in their evaluation. (Thompson-Coon et al. 2022)