Skip to main content

Table 2 COSMIN definitions of domains, measurement properties, and aspects of measurement properties [38, 39]

From: Protocol for a systematic review exploring the psychometric properties of self-report health-related quality of life and subjective wellbeing measures used by adolescents with intellectual disabilities

Term

Definition

Domain

Measurement property

Aspect of a measurement property

Reliability

  

The degree to which the measurement is free from measurement error

Reliability (extended definition)

  

The extent to which scores for patients who have not changed are the same for repeated measurement under several conditions, e.g. using different sets of items from the same patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) (internal consistency); over time (test-retest); by different persons on the same occasion (interrater); or by the same persons (i.e. raters or responders) on different occasions (intra-rater)

 

Internal consistency

 

The degree of the interrelatedness among the items

 

Reliability

 

The proportion of the total variance in the measurements which is due to ‘true’a differences between patients

 

Measurement error

 

The systematic and random error of a patient’s score that is not attributed to true changes in the construct to be measured

Validity

  

The degree to which a PROM measures the construct(s) it purports to measure

 

Content validity

 

The degree to which the content of a PROM is an adequate reflection of the construct to be measured

  

Face validity

The degree to which (the items of) a PROM indeed looks as though they are an adequate reflection of the construct to be measured

 

Construct validity

 

The degree to which the scores of a PROM are consistent with hypotheses (for instance, with regard to internal relationships, relationships to scores of other instruments, or differences between relevant groups) based on the assumption that the PROM validly measures the construct to be measured

  

Structural validity

The degree to which the scores of a PROM are an adequate reflection of the dimensionality of the construct to be measured

  

Hypotheses testing

Idem construct validity

  

Cross-cultural validity

The degree to which the performance of the items on a translated or culturally adapted PROM is an adequate reflection of the performance of the items of the original version of the PROM

 

Criterion validity

 

The degree to which the scores of a PROM are an adequate reflection of a ‘gold standard’

Responsiveness

  

The ability of a PROM to detect change over time in the construct to be measured

  

Responsiveness

Idem responsiveness

Interpretabilityb

  

Interpretability is the degree to which one can assign qualitative meaning — that is, clinical or commonly understood connotations — to a PROM’s quantitative scores or change in scores

  1. aThe word ‘true’ must be seen in the context of the CTT, which states that any observation is composed of two components — a true score and error associated with the observation. ‘True’ is the average score that would be obtained if the scale was given an infinite number of times. It refers only to the consistency of the score, and not to its accuracy [55] bInterpretability is not considered a measurement property but an important characteristic of a measurement instrument