Skip to main content

Table 11 Study characteristics and findings for all outcomes following computer-based dementia education

From: Establishing the effectiveness of technology-enabled dementia education for health and social care practitioners: a systematic review

Study

Setting

Study design

Comparator

Outcome

Measure

Results

Downs, Turner et al. 2006 [1]

Practice

Randomised trial

Workshop; decision support;

control (no training intervention)

Behaviours

Detection rates; concordance with guidelines

No evidence of effect

Matsumura, Shinno et al. 2018 [63]

HE

Controlled before-after

Did not participate in clinic simulator activity

Satisfaction

Knowledge

ARCS

Knowledge test

Evidence of effect

Evidence of effect

Rababa, Masha'al 2020 [64]

HE

Controlled before-after

Traditional lectures

Skills

CTSAS

Evidence of effect

Ruiz, Smith et al. 2006 [65]

HE

Before-after

NA

Satisfaction

Knowledge

Skills

Attitudes

PPT

Knowledge test

Self-efficacy test

Attitude test

Evidence of effect

Evidence of effect

Evidence of effect

Evidence of effect

Tsai, Kitch et al. 2018 [67]

Practice

Controlled before-after

Did not participate in video simulator activity

Behaviours

Results

Level of dressing assistance

BDPS

No evidence of effect

No evidence of effect

  1. ARCS Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction Motivational Model, BDPS Beck Dressing Performance Scale, CTSAS Critical Thinking Self-Assessment Scale, HE Higher education, NA Not applicable, PPT Pre- and post-training