Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review

Original Submission
11 Nov 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Nov 2020 Author responded Author comments - Can Wang
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Nov 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Nov 2020 Author responded Author comments - Can Wang
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Nov 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Feb 2021 Author responded Author comments - Can Wang
9 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tamirat Bekele Beressa
11 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Azam Doustmohammadian
13 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martel Chachou
18 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nasser Fardousi
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Feb 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Feb 2021 Author responded Author comments - Can Wang
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Feb 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Mar 2021 Author responded Author comments - Can Wang
4 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tamirat Bekele Beressa
10 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martel Chachou
12 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nasser Fardousi
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Mar 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
22 Mar 2021 Editorially accepted
5 Apr 2021 Article published 10.1186/s13643-021-01645-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\