Skip to main content

Table 2 Synthesis of study characteristics

From: The impact of different preanalytical methods related to CA 15-3 determination in frozen human blood samples: a systematic review

Study/year

Case/control

Study period

Outcomes

Methods

Age (years)

Subgroups

Age-/sex-matched case-control

Follow-up length

Clinical-pathological association/correlation

CA 15-3 cutoff (U/mL)

Kit or instrument

Sample type

Store temperature (°C)

Chukwurah et al. 2018 [22]

(89/21) naive BC vs healthy

2015–2017

CA 15-3 for BC surveillance

Mean ± SD

Age range (29–65)

Yes

Yes

Up to 3 and 6 months

Yes

< 35

ELISA

Serum

− 20

Mahmood et al. 2016 [23]

(70/20) premenopausal BC vs healthy

–

Ferritin vs CA 15-3 in BC

Mean ± SD; ANOVA

Age range (20–50)

Yes

Yes

–

Yes

< 119.39

HumaReader Plus made by HUMAN GmbH

Serum

− 20

Said 2019 [24]

(84/71) BC vs healthy

2016–2017

CBC with ALP and LDH for BC prognosis

ROC analysis

Mean age (32.7 ± 18.3)

No

Yes

–

No

< 15.3

HumaReader Plus made by HUMAN GmbH

Serum

− 20

Moazzezy et al. 2014 [25]

(30/30) BC naive vs healthy

2012–2013

Preoperative and clinicopathological BC features

Mean ± SEM unpaired Student’s t-test; regression analysis

Mean age 48 (23–87)

Yes

Yes

–

Yes

< 30

EIA

Serum

− 20

El-Moneim Ebied et al. 2013 [26]

(50/50) BC naive vs healthy

2010–2010

Diagnostic, prognostic, and follow-up value of CA 15-3 in BC

Mean ± SE. ROC analysis; univariate survival analysis KM

Mean age (41.73 ± 12.2)

Yes

No (comparable age (40.18 ± 11.05 years))

2 years

Yes

< 25

RIA

Serum

− 80

Svobodova et al. 2018 [27]

(412/60) BC-DR vs NDR

–

TPS, CEA, and CA 15-3 (months 1–3–6 after surgery). DR was recorded between 7 and 12 months after surgery

Mean ± SD and Wilcoxon test

Median age 61

No

Yes

1, 3, and 6 months (after surgery).

7 and 12 months for DR

No

< 30

CLEIA

Serum

− 80

Pedersen et al. 2013 [28]

(83/24) BC metastatic vs LR

2004– 2010

CA 15-3, CEA, and HER2 in the early diagnosis of metastatic HER2+ BC

95% confidence intervals

Median age 59.1 (30–86)

Yes

–

–

Yes

< 32.4

CLEIA

Serum

− 80

Di Gioia et al. 2015 [29]

(241) BC patients

1998–2007

Prognostic value of HER2 and CA 15-3 and DFS and cancer-specific survival in preoperative BC

Wilcoxon rank-sum test

Median age 57 (range 29–89)

Yes

–

7–91.4 months

Yes

< 24

EIA

Serum

− 80

Sen et al. 2011 [30]

(13/12/25/19) OV stage I/II, OV stage III/IV; benign ovarian vs healthy

2009–2011

CA 15-3, IL-6, Leptin, VEGF, and CRP for ovarian cancer prediction

Mean difference and Mann-Whitney U-test; Wilcoxon; Kruskal-Wallis test

OV stage I/II (44.6±4.65), OV stage III/IV (49.6±6.4); benign ovarian (41.6±10.3); HC (40.1±8.9)

No

No

–

Yes

< 30

MEIA

Serum

− 80

Metwally et al. 2010 [31]

(44/15) BC patients vs healthy

2009–2010

Diagnostic value of VEGF, IL-18, and NO levels in BC patients

Mean and SEM difference; ROC curve

Median age 36 (23–56)

Yes

–

–

Yes

< 11.2

MEIA

Serum

− 70

Hewala et al. 2012 [32]

(35/35) BC naive vs healthy

01/2010–08/2010

sFas and p53 protein vs CA 15-3 to monitor BC patients

Mean ± SE; Kruskal-Wallis test; ROC analysis

Case mean age (43.73 ± 12.2); HC mean age (42.18 ± 11.05)

Yes

Yes (comparable mean age)

1 year

Yes

< 23

RIA

Serum

− 80

Zajkowska et al. 2020 [33]

(120/28/32) BC patients/benign tumors (adenoma 10), fibroadenoma (18) vs healthy

–

VEGF plasma concentrations alone or combination with CA 15-3 in BC patients

Median range; ROC curve

BC cases median age 58 years, range (39–83); benign tumors 48, range (36–71)

Yes

Yes

–

Yes

< 18.45

CMIA

Plasma

− 85

Zaleski et al. 2018 [34]

(55/20/28) BC patients/benign breast disease vs healthy

2010–2013

miRNAs compared with CA 15-3 in BC monitoring

Mean; ROC curve

BC cases, 44 median age (20.1–64.5); benign breast disease, 54 median age (24.2–81.8); HC, 59 median age (32.6–85.8)

Yes

Yes

NA

Yes

< 27

CLEIA

Serum

− 80

Tang et al. 2018 [35]

(40/40/40) BC patients/benign mammary hyperplasia vs healthy

2004–2005

ALU115, ALU247/115, CEA, and CA15 in BC

Median and Mann-Whitney U-test

Median age 48 years, range 28–64. BC cases median age 46, HC median age 45

Yes

Yes

NA

Yes

< 31.3

CLEIA

Serum

− 80

Christenson et al. 2011 [36]

(66/77) CA 15-3 serum vs plasma

–

Validation of CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CA 125 II, CEA, and AFP for instrument comparison

Mean; ROC curve

All patient samples > 18

No

–

Day 0 and 1 year

No

< 42.1

Vista vs Advia Centaur

Serum and plasma

− 20; − 70

Saba et al. 2017 [37]

(44/49) malignant pleural fluid vs benign pleural fluid

2013–2014

CA 15-3 and NSE solely or in pleural fluid

ROC curve

Malignant cases mean age 66.6 ± 16.6 years versus benign pleural effusion controls 73.4 ± 16.5

No

No

NA

–

< 13.9 and < 6.68 L*

ELISA

Serum and pleural effusion

− 20

Laidi et al. 2014 [38]

(29/31) BC patients vs healthy

–

Correlation of salivary and serum CA 15-3 in BC patients

Median value; Mann-Whitney test

Mean age cases 7.24 ± 9.52 and HCs 43.45 ± 14.72

No

No

NA

Yes (lymph node status)

< 16.7

ELISA

Serum and saliva

− 80

Ercan et al. 2012 [39]

30 healthy pregnant women

–

Specificity of CA-125, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, and CEA during pregnancy

ANOVAs

Median age 29 years range 28–64

No

No

10–36 weeks

No

<25

EIA

Serum

− 20

  1. BC breast cancer, DFS disease-free survival, DR disease recurrence, LR local recurrence, NA not accessible
  2. Note: *Different measurement unit for CA 15-3 cutoff value