Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Progress in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review

Author

Year

Level of evidence

Study type

Case

Age(years)

Control

Follow up time (months)

Included outcome indicators

Chiu [12]

1999

III

Prospective cohort

25

(M:F=20:5)

68.0±16.2

  

â‘ 

Kuwano [13]

2005

III

Prospective cohort

32

(M:F=3:29)

71.4

  

â‘ 

Kyung-wook [14]

2016

II

RCT

1260 OWHTO

 

603 CWHTO

39

â‘ 

Hohmanm [15]

2005

III

Prospective cohort

67 CWHTO

(M:F=41:26)

M:36.6

F:39.4

 

8

â‘ 

Giffin [16]

2004

III

Prospective cohort

10 OWHTO

60–78

  

â‘ 

Noyes [17]

2005

IV

Prospective cohort

35 OWHTO

32.7

  

â‘ 

Raaij [18]

2008

II

RCT

43 OWHTO

 

44 CWHTO

24

â‘¢,â‘¥

Turkmen [19]

2017

III

PCS

6 OWHTO

(single plane osteotomy)

 

6 OWHTO

(biplane osteotomy)

 

â‘¢

Nakamura [20]

2017

III

RCS

111 OWHTO

(M:F=22:89)

63.8±7.2

  

â‘¢

Chen [21]

2012

III

Prospective cohort

8 OWHTO

33

  

â‘¡

Ozkaya [22]

2008

III

Prospective cohort

16 OWHTO

(M:F=4:12)

55

 

24

â‘ ,â‘¡

Lee [23]

2018

II

RCT

831 OWHTO

 

206 CWHTO

60

â‘¡

Altay [24]

2016

III

Prospective cohort

34 OWHTO

45.05±10.99

 

74.65±10.12

â‘ ,â‘¡,â‘£

Terauchi [25]

2002

III

Prospective cohort

29 OWHTO

(M:F=6:23)

66

 

96.2

⑤,⑥

El-Assal [26]

2010

II

Prospective cohort

58 OWHTO

(M:F=21:37)

47.5

 

38

⑤

Park [27]

2017

IV

Retrospective cohort

30 OWHTO

   

â‘¡

Bae [28]

2016

II

RCT

69 OWHTO

(M:F=2:67)

58.5±5.8

49 OWHTO

(M:F=4:45)

94.2±2.6

④,⑤

Kim [29]

2017

IV

RCT

687 OWHTO

 

2296 CWHTO

 

â‘£

  1. ① posterior slope of tibial plateau, ② the height of the patella, ③ fracture in the osteotomy plane, ④ survival rate, ⑤ HSS, ⑥ the recurrence of varus deformity
  2. RCT Randomized controlled trial, RCS Retrospective comparative study, PCS Prospective comparative study