Skip to main content

Table 2 Data extraction form

From: Engaging older adults in self-management talk in healthcare encounters: a systematic review protocol

Author and date
• Bibliographic details:
 o Title of study
 o Author(s)
 o Year of publication
 o Source (e.g. journal title, volume, and issue; book reference and pp.)
• Country of study
• Academic field of publication (e.g. sociology, medicine)
• Aim of the study
• Addition research questions/objectives
• Study design characteristics:
 o Methodological approach (as described by the author(s))
• Setting:
 o Number of sites (e.g. two sites of the same setting, e.g. two general practice clinics)
 o Number of institutional settings
• Participant characteristics (N, age, health status/conditions, other reported information)
• Data characteristics:
 o Recording methods (audio, audio-visual)
 o Size of the overall dataset (minutes; number of interactions recorded)
 o Number of reported episodes (extracts)—number of episodes in the data collection/corpus pertaining to EACH finding
 o Are interactions one-on-one, multiparty, or both?
 o Institutional or mundane interaction or both?
 o Is the practice observed in more than one group? (do patients or providers use it, or both?)
• Analysis characteristics—does the analysis:
 o Examine interactional data in fine-grained detail?
 o Attend to sequence (i.e. examine more than one party’s turns)?
 o Examine more than topical/semantic content? (i.e. does it examine aspects of grammar, syntax, pragmatics, and/or prosody?)
 o Includes examination of interactional consequences/outcomes?
 o Includes deviant cases?
 o Support central analytic claims by direct references to the data (e.g. quotations, extracts)? (no/occasionally/predominantly)
 o Are key analytic claims supported by reference to relevant published sources? (no/occasionally/predominantly)
• Findings reported (broad)—complete for each study:
 o Results summary (e.g. as reported in the abstract)
 o Number of relevant primary findings (types of practices)
 o Number of relevant secondary findings (types of practices)
• Findings reported (narrow)—complete for each identified phenomenon
 o Phenomenon (i.e. type of communication practice, in brief)
 o Phenomenon in the author’s own words
 o Related research question (if stated)
 o Number of episodes (extracts) pertaining to this finding in the article
 o Typical/archetypal sequence—include direct example(s)
 o Sequence/turn design features of the phenomenon
 o Interactional effects of the design features
 o Overall function of the phenomenon
 o Proposed implications in author’s own words
 o Other possible implications (reviewer’s comment)
• Conclusions
• Study limitations
• Author recommendations