From: Engaging older adults in self-management talk in healthcare encounters: a systematic review protocol
Author and date | |
---|---|
• Bibliographic details: o Title of study o Author(s) o Year of publication o Source (e.g. journal title, volume, and issue; book reference and pp.) • Country of study • Academic field of publication (e.g. sociology, medicine) • Aim of the study • Addition research questions/objectives • Study design characteristics: o Methodological approach (as described by the author(s)) • Setting: o Number of sites (e.g. two sites of the same setting, e.g. two general practice clinics) o Number of institutional settings • Participant characteristics (N, age, health status/conditions, other reported information) • Data characteristics: o Recording methods (audio, audio-visual) o Size of the overall dataset (minutes; number of interactions recorded) o Number of reported episodes (extracts)—number of episodes in the data collection/corpus pertaining to EACH finding o Are interactions one-on-one, multiparty, or both? o Institutional or mundane interaction or both? o Is the practice observed in more than one group? (do patients or providers use it, or both?) • Analysis characteristics—does the analysis: o Examine interactional data in fine-grained detail? o Attend to sequence (i.e. examine more than one party’s turns)? o Examine more than topical/semantic content? (i.e. does it examine aspects of grammar, syntax, pragmatics, and/or prosody?) o Includes examination of interactional consequences/outcomes? o Includes deviant cases? o Support central analytic claims by direct references to the data (e.g. quotations, extracts)? (no/occasionally/predominantly) o Are key analytic claims supported by reference to relevant published sources? (no/occasionally/predominantly) • Findings reported (broad)—complete for each study: o Results summary (e.g. as reported in the abstract) o Number of relevant primary findings (types of practices) o Number of relevant secondary findings (types of practices) • Findings reported (narrow)—complete for each identified phenomenon o Phenomenon (i.e. type of communication practice, in brief) o Phenomenon in the author’s own words o Related research question (if stated) o Number of episodes (extracts) pertaining to this finding in the article o Typical/archetypal sequence—include direct example(s) o Sequence/turn design features of the phenomenon o Interactional effects of the design features o Overall function of the phenomenon o Proposed implications in author’s own words o Other possible implications (reviewer’s comment) • Conclusions • Study limitations • Author recommendations |