Skip to main content

Table 1 Interrater agreement between two assessors for study selection and risk of bias

From: Effectiveness of exergames for improving mobility and balance in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Items

% agreement

Kappa

95%CI

P

Study selection

95

0.847

0.66–1.0

0.0001

Overall agreement for risk of bias

81

0.676

0.49–0.95

0.01

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

83

0.733

0.38–1.0

0.0001

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

83

0.724

0.33–1.0

0.01

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

75

0.581

0.13–0.87

0.008

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)

83

0.733

0.33–1.0

0.0001

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

92

0.860

0.54–1.0

0.0001

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

67

0.429

0.59–0.83

0.05

  1. CI confidence interval