Table 5 Assessment of implementation outcomes of diabetes self-management peer support strategies in LMIC by mode of intervention delivery
Mode of delivery | Domain | Study design | Acceptability | Adoption | Appropriateness | Feasibility | Implementation Cost | Penetration | Sustainability | Available measurement/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peer | Debussche et al. 2018 [50] | RCT | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (–) | (–) | (–) | Direct observation |
Zhong et al. 2015 [51] | RCT | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (–) | (+) | (+) | Focus groups/interviews/report/records | |
Gagliardino 2014 [52] | RCT | (–) | (–) | (–) | (+) | (–) | (–) | (–) | Structured questionnaire/interviews | |
Assah et al. 2015 [43] | Non-RCT With a control arm | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | Structured questionnaires | |
Baumann et al. 2014 [44] | Pre/post | (+) | (–) | (–) | (+) | (–) | (+) | (+) | Report/phone records/questionnaires | |
Shen 2008 [47] | Pre/post | (+) | (–) | (–) | (+) | (–) | (–) | (–) | Focus groups/report/records/questionnaire | |
Eggermont 2011 [45] | Pre/post | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | Structured questionnaire/in-depth interviews | |
Rotheram-Borus et al. 2012 [46] | Pre/post | (+) | (–) | (–) | (+) | (–) | (–) | (–) | Structured questionnaire/interviews | |
NCHWS | Mash et al. 2014 [53] | RCT | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | Interviews/report/records/questionnaire |
|  | Micikas et al. 2014 [49] | Pre/post | (+) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | Focus groups/structured questionnaires |
|  | Less et al. 2010 [48] | Pre/post | (–) | (–) | (–) | (–) | (+) | (–) | (+) | Structured questionnaire |