From: Diabetes drugs for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review
Author, year country trial name (quality rating) | Population demographics | Interventions (group sizes) duration | Efficacy/effectiveness outcomes A vs. B | Harms A vs. B |
---|---|---|---|---|
Armstrong, 2013 [21] Multinational LEAD & LEAD-2 (fair) | Patients with type 2 diabetes who were unable to maintain glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%) with diet and exercise alone, or with oral antidiabetic treatment Age: 55.9 years Gender, % Female: 46.5 Ethnicity, %: White: 78.6 Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander: 12.7 Black/African American: 5.8 Other: 2.1 BMI: NR NAFLD/NASH Stage: NR Liver enzymes (IU/L): Total ALT mean (SD): 29.4 (16.6) Normal ALT mean (SD): 19.1 (5.6) Abnormal ALT mean (SD): 39.4 (17.7) | LEAD A: Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day (475) B: Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day (896) C: Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day (1363) D: Placebo (524) Duration: 26 weeks LEAD-2 0.6, 1.2, or 1.8 mg/day liraglutide, 4 mg/day glimepiride or placebo, all in combination with metformin | LEAD In patients with elevated ALT, liraglutide 1.8 significantly reduced ALT compared with placebo (and was dose responsive); however, after correcting for change in weight, the difference was no longer significant: Mean difference − 1.41, P = 0.21, with similar finding after correcting for reduction in HbA1c: Mean difference 0.57, P = 0.63. Lower doses of liraglutide had similar effects as placebo LEAD2 64% of patients had elevated liver fat on CT; as above liraglutide improved liver fat in a dose dependent way; however, there was no significant differences between liraglutide and placebo after correcting either for weight loss or HbA1c (P = 0.90 and 0.73, respectively) | LEAD WAE: 9% vs. 9% vs. 3% (liraglutide vs. placebo, P < 0.001) SAE: 7% vs. 6% vs. 6% GI disorders: 46% vs. 45% vs. 18% (liraglutide vs. placebo, P < 0.001) LEAD2 NR |
Armstrong, 2016 [9] UK LEAN (good) | Patients had histologically confirmed NASH Age: 51 Sex: 60% male Ethnicity: White: 88% Asian: 4% Black: 2% Other: 6% Liver status: NAS: 4.9; ALT: 72 IU/mL; F3-F4: 52% BMI: 36 Diabetes: 33% | A. Liraglutide 1.8 mg (26) B. Placebo (26) Duration: 48 weeks | Resolution of NASH: 39% vs. 9% (RR 4.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 17.7) Change in NAS: − 1.3 vs. − 0.8, P = 0.24 Change in fibrosis stage: − 0.2 vs. 0.2, P = 0.11 Patients with improvement in fibrosis: 26% vs. 14%, P = 0.46 Patient with worsening fibrosis: 9% vs. 36%, P = 0.04 Change in ALT: − 26.6 vs. − 10.2, P = 0.16 Change in AST: − 27 vs. + 9 IU/L; P = 0.025 | WAE: 8% vs. 4% (P = 0.56) SAE: 8% vs. 8% GI disorders: 81% vs. 65% (P = 0.27) |
Shao, 2014 [8] China (fair) | Patients with type 2 diabetes, obesity, NAFLD, and elevated liver enzymes with normal renal function Age: 43 Sex: 48% male Ethnicity: Chinese Mild NAFLD: 40% Moderate NAFLD: 42% Severe: 18% BMI: 30 HbA1c: 7.64% | A. exenatide + glargine (30) B. Intensive insulin: Insulin aspart + insulin glargine (30) Duration: 12 weeks | Reversal rate of NAFLD based on ultrasound: A vs. B: 93% vs. 67% , P < 0.01 Differences in weight change post minus pretreatment: A vs. B: − 7.77 kg vs. 3.27, P < 0.001 No difference between groups in change in HbA1c: A vs. B: − 1.42% vs. − 1.31%, P > 0.05 | NR |