|
Author
|
Sample size (treatment group vs. control group)
|
Difference
|
95% CI
|
|---|
|
Caraccio et al. [58]
|
49 (24 vs. 25)
|
1.30 kg/m2*
|
− 0.33 to 2.93
|
|
Caraccio et al. [59]
|
23 (12 vs. 11)
|
− 0.40 kg/m2*
|
− 2.52 to 1.72
|
|
Duman et al. [60]
|
39 (20 vs. 19)
|
− 0.70 kg/m2*
|
− 2.91 to 1.51
|
|
Iqbal et al. [62]
|
64 (32 vs. 32)
|
1.40 kg/m2*
|
− 1.06 to 3.86
|
|
Liu et al. [64]
|
119 (60 vs. 59)
|
− 0.10 kg/m2**
|
− 0.51 to 0.31
|
|
Monzani et al. [67]
|
20 (10 vs. 10)
|
0.00 kg/m2*
|
− 3.22 to 3.22
|
|
Monzani et al. [68]
|
45 (23 vs. 22)
|
− 1.20 kg/m2*
|
− 3.34 to 0.94
|
|
Nagasaki et al. [69]
|
95 (48 vs. 47)
|
− 0.30 kg/m2**
|
− 1.26 to 0.66
|
|
Stott et al. [73]
|
638 (318 vs. 320)
|
0.0 kg/m2*
|
− 0.02 to 0.02
|
|
Teixeira et al. [74, 75]
|
26 (11 vs. 15)
|
2.90 kg/m2*
|
0.38–5.42
|
|
Yazici et al. [76]
|
45 (23 vs. 22)
|
− 0.20 kg/m2*
|
− 2.10 to 1.70
|
- *Value is the difference in mean scores at final follow-up between treatment and control groups
- **Value is the difference in mean variation scores from baseline to follow-up between treatment and control group
