Author | Sample size (treatment group vs. control group) | Difference | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
Caraccio et al. [58] | 49 (24 vs. 25) | 1.30 kg/m2* | − 0.33 to 2.93 |
Caraccio et al. [59] | 23 (12 vs. 11) | − 0.40 kg/m2* | − 2.52 to 1.72 |
Duman et al. [60] | 39 (20 vs. 19) | − 0.70 kg/m2* | − 2.91 to 1.51 |
Iqbal et al. [62] | 64 (32 vs. 32) | 1.40 kg/m2* | − 1.06 to 3.86 |
Liu et al. [64] | 119 (60 vs. 59) | − 0.10 kg/m2** | − 0.51 to 0.31 |
Monzani et al. [67] | 20 (10 vs. 10) | 0.00 kg/m2* | − 3.22 to 3.22 |
Monzani et al. [68] | 45 (23 vs. 22) | − 1.20 kg/m2* | − 3.34 to 0.94 |
Nagasaki et al. [69] | 95 (48 vs. 47) | − 0.30 kg/m2** | − 1.26 to 0.66 |
Stott et al. [73] | 638 (318 vs. 320) | 0.0 kg/m2* | − 0.02 to 0.02 |
26 (11 vs. 15) | 2.90 kg/m2* | 0.38–5.42 | |
Yazici et al. [76] | 45 (23 vs. 22) | − 0.20 kg/m2* | − 2.10 to 1.70 |