Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of review and participant characteristics

From: Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews

Characteristic

Systematic reviews with meta-analysis (n = 35)

Systematic reviews without meta-analysis (n = 29)

Review characteristics

 Year of publication [n (%)]

  1990–1999

1 (3)

1 (3)

  2000–2009

5 (14)

9 (31)

  2010–2018

29 (83)

19 (66)

 Literature search date [n (%)]

  1990–1999

1 (3)

2 (7)

  2000–2009

7 (20)

7 (24)

  2010–2019

24 (69)

16 (55)

  Not reported

3 (9)

4 (14)

 Literature search coverage [n (%)]

  From database inception

8 (23)

3 (10)

  > 50 years prior to search date

2 (6)

3 (10)

  30–49 years prior to search date

4 (11)

9 (31)

  10–29 years prior to search date

1 (3)

1 (3)

  Not reported

20 (57)

13 (45)

 Region of publication [n (%)]

  Asia

15 (43)

2 (7)

  Europe

8 (23)

6 (21)

  North America

11 (31)

19 (65)a

  Oceania

1 (3)

2 (7)

  Number of included primary studies [mean (range)]

27 (3–139)

8 (2–22)

 Included study designs [n (%)]b

  Randomized controlled trials

33 (94)

23 (79)

  Non-randomized controlled trials

–

7 (24)

  Quasi-experimental

1 (3)

3 (10)

  Observational

–

4 (14)

  Not reported

2 (6)

4 (14)

Population characteristics

 Overall sample size [mean (range)]c

1861 (171–6303)

566 (34–1794)

 Mean age [range (years)]d

45–56.6

53.3c

 Proportion of female participants [range (%)]e

35.6–74.2

–

 Patients with co-morbidities [n (%)]

  No co-morbidities

12 (34)

6 (21)

  Mix of patients with and without co-morbidities

9 (26)

9 (31)

  All patients with co-morbidities

11 (31)

9 (31)

  Not reported

3 (9)

5 (17)

 Types of co-morbidities [n (%)]b

  Mental health conditions (various)

9 (26)

11 (38)

  Cancer

8 (23)

6 (21)

  Conditions causing chronic pain

5 (14)

–

  Chronic illness (unspecified)

4 (11)

2 (7)

  Other sleep disorders

4 (11)

–

  Dementia

3 (9)

2 (7)

  Physical disability

2 (6)

1 (3)

Treatment comparisons [n (%)]b

(v inactive controls)

(v active controls)

Benzodiazepines

(flurazepam, temazepam, triazolam)

3 (9)

--

2 (7)

1 (3)

Non-benzodiazepine receptor agonists

(zolpidem, zopiclone)

4 (11)

--

5 (17)

3 (10)

Suvorexant

3 (9)

--

1 (3)

--

Antidepressants

(doxepin, trazodone)

5 (14)

--

5 (17)

3 (10)

Antipsychotics

(quetiapine)

--

--

4 (14)

--

Melatonin

8 (23)

--

4 (14)

--

Diphenhydramine

1 (3)

--

2 (7)

--

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)

(CBT, CBT + behavioral intervention, multi-component CBT)

20 (57)

3 (9)

8 (28)

3 (10)

Behavioral interventions

(relaxation, sleep restriction, multi-component behavioral)

4 (11)

1 (3)

7 (24)

--

Mindfulness-based interventions

1 (3)

--

--

--

Combination therapies

(CBT + pharmacotherapy)

1 (3)

--

1 (3)

--

  1. aIncludes 17 SRs from the USA
  2. bSR + MAs or SRs can contribute to multiple categories, totals will not equal 100%
  3. cSample size was not reported in 11 SR + MAs and 8 SRs
  4. dMean age was only reported in 1 SR and 7 SR + MAs
  5. eThe percentage of female patients was only reported in 7 SR + MAs