Peer Review reports
From: Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joao Rodrigo Mesquita |
| 30 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Deborah Passey |
| 9 Dec 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Serawit Deyno |
| 10 Dec 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ferdinand Mukumbang |
| 10 Dec 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniela Melo |
| 26 Dec 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingrid Eshun-Wilson |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 Dec 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 7 Jan 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joao Rodrigo Mesquita |
| 7 Jan 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Deborah Passey |
| 10 Jan 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Serawit Deyno |
| 14 Jan 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ferdinand Mukumbang |
| 14 Jan 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniela Melo |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 Jan 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Feb 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s13643-019-0960-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.