Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Index of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine industry clinical study programmes and non-industry funded studies: a necessary basis to address reporting bias in a systematic review

Original Submission
13 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Juthaporn Cowan
3 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beate Wieseler
2 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lars Jørgensen
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lars Jørgensen
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Elsheemy
16 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Nevitt
22 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam G. Dunn
18 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lars Jørgensen
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Nevitt
24 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam G. Dunn
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
8 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
18 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13643-018-0675-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page