|
Individual
| ● No barriers identified at the citizen or patient level for any of the program features |
|
Service provider
|
Program feature 1 - organizing a rapid-response program
|
| ● Existing providers of rapid-response programs may overlap to some extent with the scope of a new program focused on producing rapid syntheses for health system decision-makers about problems, options and/or implementation considerations related to a specific health system challenge |
|
Program feature 2 - deciding what can be done in what timelines
|
| ● None identified |
|
Program feature 3 - defining success and measuring it
|
| ● None identified |
|
Organization
|
Program feature 1 - organizing a rapid-response program
|
| ● Organizations may still lack the skills, structures, processes and a culture to promote and use research findings in decision-making |
|
Program feature 2 - deciding what can be done in what timelines
|
| ● None identified |
|
Program feature 3 - defining success and measuring it
|
| ● None identified |
|
System
|
Program feature 1 - organizing a rapid-response program
|
| ● Decision-makers may be reluctant to rely on a rapid-response program established in another jurisdiction |
| ● Decision-makers may be reluctant to make requests to an external rapid-response program for politically sensitive issues or to publicly disclose that they made a request |
| ● Decision-makers may face difficulties in developing a shared vision for a rapid-response program given their constraints and competing priorities |
|
Program feature 2 - deciding what can be done in what timelines
|
| ● Decision-makers may not be inclined to make requests to an external rapid-response program for very short timeframes (e.g. 3 days) given that this may already be done internally on a routine basis |
|
Program feature 3 - defining success and measuring it
|
| ● Decision-makers may be reluctant to fully disclose the impact of the rapid-response program, especially on politically sensitive issues |
