Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework

Original Submission
24 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Anna Huguet
15 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nick Meader
22 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rob Scholten
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Anna Huguet
10 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nick Meader
5 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rob Scholten
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nick Meader
9 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rob Scholten
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Aug 2013 Editorially accepted
5 Sep 2013 Article published 10.1186/2046-4053-2-71

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page