Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francisco VÃ zquez-Nava |
| 1 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Julie Eichenberger Gilmore |
| 23 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Merrilyn Hooley |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 24 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Merrilyn Hooley |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 3 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Merrilyn Hooley |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 21 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Merrilyn Hooley |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 21 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 8 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Merrilyn Hooley |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 8 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/2046-4053-1-57 |
You can find further information about peer review here.