Peer Review reports
From: Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul M Wilson |
| 8 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Wilson |
| 13 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Julia Littell |
| 5 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Kristin Konnyu |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 19 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul M Wilson |
| 26 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Julia Littell |
| 29 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Wilson |
| 12 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Kristin Konnyu |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 25 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Kristin Konnyu |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 25 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.