Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of bibliographic databases identifying relevant systematic reviews of interventions for treating hypertension (excluding non-conventional treatments)

From: A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension

Database

Reviews relevant

Reviews missed

Total citations

Sensitivity (s) %

Precision (Pr) %

Unique records

EMBASE

169

63

3722

72.8

4.5

34

Cochrane

143

89

704

61.6

20.3

7

MEDLINE

138

94

2282

59.5

6.0

0

DARE

127

105

998

54.7

12.7

0

PubMed Health

126

106

812

54.3

15.5

0

Epistemonikos

116

116

938

50.0

12.4

0

TRIP

72

160

1320

31.0

5.5

0

  1. Reference set of included systematic review (n = 232)