Meta-analysis | Â | Â | Published | Distributional estimates for low birthweight | Â | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of studies | Pooled sample size | Mean difference (g) (95% CI) | P-value | Distributional RR (95% CI) | P-value | Comments | |
Abou El Senoun 2010 [13] | 1 | 55 | −170 (−558, 218) | 0.39 | 1.13 (0.85, 1.51) | 0.39 |  |
Alfirevic 2010 [14] | 7 | 3,887 | 28 (−10, 66) | 0.15 | 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) | 0.28 |  |
Alfirevic 2010 [15] | 2 | 5,914 | −18 (−42, 7) | 0.16 | 1.08 (0.97, 1.19) | 0.15 |  |
Begley 2010 [16] | 2 | 3,207 | −77 (−109, −45) | < 0.01 | 1.49 (1.27, 1.77) | < 0.01 |  |
Bevilacqua 2010 [17] | 7 | 5,372 | −83 (−124, −42) | < 0.01 | 1.04 (1.02, 1.08) | < 0.01 |  |
Blanco 2011 [18] | 2 | 786 | 113 (−45, 271) | 0.16 | 0.74 (0.48, 1.16) | 0.19 |  |
Buchanan 2010 [19] | 7 | 692 | −12 (−91, 67) | 0.76 | 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) | 0.87 |  |
Coleman 2010 [20] | 3 | 614 | 158 (−53, 370) | 0.14 | 0.65 (0.36, 1.18) | 0.16 |  |
Crowther 2011 [21] | 9 | 5,626 | −76 (−118, −34) | < 0.01 | 1.02 (1.01,1.03) | 0.01 |  |
Dhulkotia 2010 [22] | 6 | 1,388 | 24 (−36, 83) | 0.44 | 0.93 (0.77, 1.13) | 0.48 |  |
Gebreselassie 2011 [23] | 17 | 6,208 | 39 (−7, 85) | 0.09 | 0.88 (0.76, 1.02) | 0.08 |  |
Imdad 2011 [24] | 13 | 4,189 | 60 (33, 87) | < 0.01 | 0.79 (0.71, 0.87) | < 0.01 | Â |
Lassi 2010 [25] | 2 | 1,050 | 11 (−39, 62) | 0.66 | 0.98 (0.84, 1.14) | 0.78 |  |
Mackeen 2011 [26] | 2 | 117 | 159 (−44, 361) | 0.13 | 0.97 (0.93, 1.02) | 0.19 |  |
Mak 2010 [27] | 4 | 251 | 8.33 (−143, 159) | 0.91 | 0.99 (0.62, 1.58) | 0.96 | 4/6 primary studies were accessible |
Middleton 2010 [28] | 2 | 159 | −3 (−180, 175) | 0.98 | 0.99 (0.53, 1.90) | 0.99 |  |
Nabhan 2011 [29] | 1 | 125 | −100 (−364, 164) | 0.46 | 1.18 (0.78, 1.80) | 0.46 |  |
Quinlivan 2011 [30] | 4 | 537 | 8.5 (−85, 102) | 0.86 | 0.97 (0.67, 1.41) | 0.88 |  |
Rumbold 2011 [31] | 5 | 7,497 | 6.1 (−17, 29) | 0.61 | 0.99 (0.91, 1.08) | 0.84 |  |
Stampalija 2010 [32] | 1 | 3,133 | −34 (−69, 0.63) | 0.05 | 1.15 (0.99, 1.33) | 0.05 |  |
Vazquez 2011a[33] | 1 | 128 | −461 (−608, −314) | < 0.01 | 4.91 (2.88, 8.37) | < 0.01 | Data from meta-analysis where outcome was analysed as continuous for one intervention and as binary for another. |