Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristic of included studies in meta-analysis

From: The effects of rice bran supplementation for management of blood lipids: A GRADE-assessed systematic review, dose–response meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

studies

Country

Study Design

Participant

Sex

Sample size

Trial Duration

(Week)

Means Age

Means BMI

Intervention

IG

CG

IG

CG

IG

CG

Rice bran dose (g/d)

Control group

Kestin et al. 1990 (A) [31]

Australia

Cross over (R, DB)

Mildly hypercholesterolemic patients

Male

24

24

4

46.0 ± 10.0

46.0 ± 10.0

25.4 ± 2.0

25.4 ± 2.0

60

Slice of bread or muffin containing 35 g wheat bran

Kestin et al. 1990 (B) [31]

Australia

Cross over (R, DB)

Mildly hypercholesterolemic patients

Male

24

24

4

46.0 ± 10.0

46.0 ± 10.0

25.4 ± 2.0

25.4 ± 2.0

60

Slice of bread or muffin containing 95 g oat bran

Hegsted et al. 1993 [32]

United States

Cross over (R)

Mildly hypercholesterolemic patients

Both

11

11

3

37 ± 10

37 ± 10

26.6 ± 3.4

26.6 ± 3.4

100

Oat bran

Gerhardt et al. 1998 (A) [33]

United States

parallel (R, PC, DB)

Moderately hypercholesterolemic patients

Both

14

13

6

51.7 ± 1.5

51.7 ± 1.5

24.43

24.43

84

Oat bran

Gerhardt et al. 1998 (B) [33]

United States

parallel (R, PC, DB)

Moderately hypercholesterolemic patients

Both

14

17

6

51.7 ± 1.5

51.7 ± 1.5

24.43

24.43

84

Rice starch

Tazakori et al. 2006 [12]

Iran

parallel (PC, DB)

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus & hypertriglyceridemic

Both

30

30

4

48 ± 10

50 ± 9.3

27.3 ± 3.5

26.2 ± 4

20

White flour without fiber

Matani et al. 2006 [34]

Iran

parallel (R)

Moderately Hypercholesterolemic

Female

10

9

4

51 ± 6

54 ± 7

31 ± 5

28 ± 4

40

wheat bran

Cheng et al. 2010 [13]

Taiwan

parallel (R, PC, DB)

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Both

17

11

12

58.9 ± 10.4

57.7 ± 5.7

25.0 ± 2.2

25.6 ± 2.1

20

milled rice flour

Rondanelli et al. 2011 [35]

Italy

Cross over (R)

Mildly hypercholesterolemic patients

Male

24

24

4

50.33 ± 5.34

50.33 ± 5.34

24.9 ± 1.9

24.9 ± 1.9

30

Beta glucan enriched foods

Borresen et al. 2016 (A) [36]

United States

parallel (R, SB)

Colorectal Cancer Survivors

Both

9

10

4

62 ± 8

59 ± 12

28.7 ± 5.2

28.5 ± 7.9

30

Cooked navy bean powder enriched foods

Borresen et al. 2016 (B) [36]

United States

parallel (R, SB)

Colorectal Cancer Survivors

Both

9

10

4

62 ± 8

64 ± 14

28.7 ± 5.2

27.3 ± 3.3

30

same ingredients as the intervention foods, but did not include NB or RB

  1. Abbreviations: IG intervention group, CG control group, DB double-blinded, SB single-blinded, PC placebo-controlled, CO controlled, R randomized, NR not reported, F Female, M Male, NR not reported
  2. Variables are mean ± SD