Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of the 2827 included study results and their 455 meta-analyses

From: Study results from journals with a higher impact factor are closer to “truth”: a meta-epidemiological study

 

Total

Journals with JIF

Study results

(N = 2827)

Meta-analyses

(N = 455)

Study results

(N = 2459)

Meta-analyses

(N = 446)

Quality of evidence

 High, N (%)

652 (23.1)

87 (19.1)

607 (24.7)

86 (19.3)

 Moderate, N (%)

2175 (76.9)

368 (80.9)

1852 (75.3)

360 (80.7)

Open access

 Yes, N (%)

239 (8.5)

NA

190 (7.7)

NA

Size of meta-analysis

 Ten or more studies, N (%)

1545 (54.7)

119 (26.2)

1330 (54.1)

118 (26.5)

Pooling method

 Fixed effects model, N (%)

1003 (35.5)

188 (41.3)

864 (35.1)

186 (41.7)

 Random effects model, N (%)

1824 (64.5)

267 (58.7)

1595 (64.9)

260 (58.3)

Study weight (in %)

 Median (1. to 3. Quartile)

7.1 (2.8 to 16.6)

NA

7.4 (2.9 to 16.8)

NA

 Range

 < 0.05 to < 50

NA

 < 0.05 to < 50

NA

Risk of bias

 Median (1. to 3. Quartile)

0.21 (0.12 to 0.36)

NA

0.21 (0.08 to 0.36)

NA

 Range

0 to 1

NA

0 to 0.86

NA

Missing, N

11

 

-

 

Measure of effect

 RR, N (%)

1375 (54.6)

NA

1174 (47.7)

NA

 OR, N (%)

403 (10.9)

NA

363 (14.8)

NA

 HR, N (%)

108 (0.5)

NA

106 (4.3)

NA

 Mean difference, N (%)

941 (34.0)

NA

816 (33.2)

NA

Relative deviationa

 Median (1. to 3. Quartile)

0.79 (0.33 to 1.41)

NA

0.77 (0.33 to 1.41)

NA

 Range

 < 0.01 to 11.6

 

 < 0.01 to 11.6

 
  1. aThree observations were excluded from further analysis because of their extreme relative deviation
  2. NA Not applicable