Skip to main content

Table 3 The framework to categorise included studies filled in based upon included studies

From: Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review

 

Data material

Overall design

Methods

Metrics

The problem: Redundancy

1. Primary studies

2. Systematic reviews

3. Funding proposals

4. REC proposals

5. Published protocols

6. Researchers

1. Systematic review

2. Cross-sectional study

3. Other observational study

4. Qualitative study

1. Citation analysis

2. Content analysis

3. Cut-off analysis

4. Survey

1. The number of overlapping meta-analyses

2. Impact of SR on design of subsequent research

3. Description of cumulative meta-analyses

Possible reasons for problem: Presence of QRPs

1. Primary studies

2. Systematic reviews

3. Funding proposals

4. REC proposals

5. Published protocols

6. Researchers

1. Systematic review

2. Cross-sectional study

3. Other observational study

4. Qualitative study

5. Randomised study

1. Citation analysis

2. Content analysis

3. Survey

1. Number of studies citing SRs

2. Number of studies citing available/relevant SRs

3. Number of similar original studies cited

4. Number of studies citing similar studies

5. Number of studies citing prior SR

6. Number of studies citing SRs or original studies

7. Number of available / relevant SRs that were cited

8. Number and type of studies cited

  1. REC Research Ethic Committee