Skip to main content

Table 4 The comparison of each item of PRISMA for abstract adequately reported in SRs and MAs published in Chinese and English

From: Efficacy and safety of Tripterygium wilfordii polyglycosides for diabetic kidney disease: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Item

Chinses publications

English publications

P-valueâ–²

1. Title

11/13 (85%)

6/6 (100%)

1.00

2. Objectives

9/13 (69%)

6/6 (100%)

0.26

3. Eligibility criteria

5/13 (38%)

4/6 (67%)

0.35

4. Information sources (key databases searched and date of last search)

7/13 (54%)

4/6 (67%)

1.00

5. Risk of bias assessment (methods for assessing risk of bias)

2/13 (15%)

0

NA

6. Included studies (number and type of included studies and participants and relevant characteristics of studies)

8/13 (62%)

6/6 (100%)

0.13

7. Synthesis of results (results for main outcomes, preferably indicating the number of studies and participants for each. If meta-analysis was done, include summary measures and confidence intervals)

6/13 (46%)

6/6 (100%)

0.04

8. Description of effect (direction of the effect and size of the effect in terms meaningful to patients and clinicians)

8/13 (62%)

6/6 (100%)

0.13

9. Strengths and limitations of evidence

4/13 (31%)

1/6 (17%)

1.00

10. General interpretation of the results and important implications

9/13 (69%)

6/6 (100%)

0.26

11. Funding

0

0

NA

12. Registration number and registry name

0

0

NA

  1. P-values in italic typeface highlight a difference that was not statistically significantly different between the two journal types
  2. NA not applicable
  3. ▲Fisher’s exact test