Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological quality of the included studies assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for prevalence studies

From: Instruments to assess the role of the clinical pharmacist: a systematic review

Instruments

Author/year

Q1*

Q2*

Q3*

Q4*

Q5*

Q6*

Q7*

Q8*

Score/risk

General instruments

  BPCS adapted

Bell et al. (1998) [15]

N

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

62.5%/moderate

  Rossing’s questionnaire

Rossing et al. (2003) [16]

NC

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

Y

37.5%/high

  Ngorsuraches’ questionnaire

Ngorsuraches and Li (2006) [17]

NC

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

Y

37.5%/high

  BPCS adapted

Hughes et al. (2010) [18]

NC

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

75%/low

  Aburuz’s questionnaire

Aburuz  et al. (2011) [19]

N

Y

Y

Y

N

N

NC

N

37.5%/high

  Azhar’s questionnaire

Azhar et al. (2011) [20]

NC

Y

Y

Y

N

N

NC

Y

50%/moderate

  Al-Arifi’s questionnaire

Al-Arifi et al. (2015) [22]

NC

Y

Y

Y

N

N

NC

NC

37.5%/high

  El Hajj’s questionnaire

El Hajj et al. (2016) [23]

Y

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

Y

50%/moderate

Specific instruments: disease/health conditions

  DAS adapted

Schapansky and Johnson (2000) [24]

N

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

Y

37.5%/high

  Abduelkarem’s questionnaire

Abduelkarem et al. (2003) [25]

N

Y

Y

Y

N

N

N

NC

37.5%/high

  Wibowo’s questionnaire

Wibowo et al. (2015) [26]

Y

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

Y

50%/moderate

  El Hajj’s questionnaire

El Hajj et al. (2016) [27]

Y

Y

NC

Y

N

Y

NC

Y

62.5%/moderate

  Scheerder’s scale

Scheerder et al. (2008) [28]

Y

Y

N

Y

N

N

N

Y

50%/moderate

  Albassam’s questionnaire

Albassam and  Awad (2018) [29]

NC

Y

NC

Y

N

Y

NC

NC

37.5%/high

  Giannetti’s questionnaire

Giannetti et al. (2018) [30]

NC

Y

Y

Y

N

N

NC

N

37.5%/high

  Ashley’s questionnaire

Ashley (2007) [31]

N

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

62.5%/moderate

  Mohamed’s questionnaire

Mohamed et al. (2014) [32]

Y

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

N

37.5%/high

Specific instruments: services/activities

  Tai’s instrument

Tai et al. (2016) [33]

N

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

NC

Y

62.5%/moderate

  Paluck’s questionnaire

Paluck et al. (1994) [34]

NC

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

62.5%/moderate

  Mohamed’s questionnaire

Mohamed et al. (2013) [35]

Y

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

NC

37.5%/high

  Shah’s questionnaire

Shah and Chawla (2011) [36]

NC

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

Y

37.5%/high

  Isenor’s questionnaire

Isenor et al. (2018) [37]

Y

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

N

37.5%/high

  Perreault’s questionnaire

Perreault et al. (2012) [39]

N

Y

NC

Y

N

Y

NC

NC

37.5%/high

  Stewart’s questionnaire

Stewart et al. (2015) [40]

N

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

62.5%/moderate

  Elkalmi’s questionnaire

Elkalmi et al. (2014) [42]

N

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

Y

37.5%/high

  Taing’s questionnaire

Taing et al. (2016) [43]

N

Y

NC

Y

N

N

NC

Y

37.5%/high

  PSOPSC adapted

Jia et al. (2014) [46]

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

75%/low

  1. Y Yes, N No, NC Not clear.*Q1, the sample was appropriate to address the target population. *Q2, criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined. *Q3, adequate sample size. *Q4, study subjects and the setting described in detail, *Q5, analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample. *Q6, outcomes measured in a valid way. *Q7, objective and standard criteria for measurement. *Q8, appropriate statistical analysis