Skip to main content

Table 1 Levels of evidence of the quality of psychometric properties of the instruments

From: Instruments to assess the role of the clinical pharmacist: a systematic review

Instruments

Author/year

Content

Response process

Internal structure

Other variables

Consequences

General Instruments

  BPCS

Odedina and Segal (1996) [12]

 +  +  + 

 + 

 +  + 

 +  + 

Na

  Rossing’s questionnaire

Rossing et al. (2003) [16]

?

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Ngorsuraches’s questionnaire

Ngorsuraches and Li (2006) [17]

?

Na

?

Na

Na

  Aburuz’s questionnaire

Aburuz et al. (2011) [19]

 + 

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Azhar’s questionnaire

Azhar et al. (2011) [20]

 + 

 + 

 + 

Na

Na

  PABS

Jocić and Krajnović (2014) [21]

?

Na

-

Na

Na

  Al-arifi’s questionnaire

Al-arifi et al. (2015) [22]

?

Na

?

Na

Na

  El Hajj’s questionnaire

El Hajj et al. (2016) [23]

 + 

Na

?

Na

Na

Specific instruments: disease/health conditions

  Abduelkarem’s questionnaire

Abduelkarem et al. (2003) [25]

?

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Wibowo’s questionnaire

Wibowo et al. (2015) [26]

 + 

Na

?

Na

Na

  El Hajj’s questionnaire

El Hajj et al. (2016) [27]

 + 

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Scheerder’s scale

Scheerder et al. (2008) [28]

 + 

Na

 ± 

Na

Na

  Albassam’s questionnaire

Albassam and Awad (2018) [29]

 + 

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Giannetti’s questionnaire

Giannetti et al. (2018) [30]

 + 

Na

?

Na

Na

  Ashley’s questionnaire

Ashley (2007) [31]

?

Na

 +  + 

Na

Na

  Mohamed’s questionnaire

Mohamed et al. (2014) [32]

 + 

Na

?

Na

Na

Specific instruments: services/activities

  Tai’s instrument

Tai et al. (2016) [33]

 + 

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Paluck’s questionnaire

Paluck et al. (1994) [34]

 +  + 

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Mohamed’s questionnaire

Mohamed et al. (2013) [35]

 + 

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Shah’s questionnaire

Shah and Chawla (2011) [36]

 + 

Na

?

Na

Na

  MMAM instrument

Witry et al. (2016) [38]

 +  + 

Na

 +  + 

 + 

Na

  Perreault’s questionnaire

Perreault et al. (2012) [39]

?

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Stewart’s questionnaire

Stewart et al. (2015) [40]

 + 

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Guirguis’s questionnaire

Guirguis et al. (2018) [41]

Na

Na

?

Na

Na

  35 Elkalmi’s questionnaire

Elkalmi et al. (2014) [42]

 + 

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Taing’s questionnaire

Taing et al. (2016) [43]

 + 

Na

 + 

Na

Na

  Zardain’s questionnaire

Zardain Tamargo et al. (2006) [44]

?

 + 

 +  + 

Na

Na

  1.  +  +  + or –- strong evidence positive/negative result, +  + or – moderate evidence positive/negative result, + or—limited evidence positive/negative result, + / − conflicting evidence, ? unknown, due to poor methodological quality, na no information available