Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristic of 35 eligible papers included in this systematic review

From: Investigating the safety and efficacy of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for treatment of T1DM: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stem cell type

Author and year

type of study

Sample size

Mean age of patients (years)

Mean history of disease (years)

Mean dose of injected cells/kg

rout of injection

Number of insulin free

Mean follow-up period (months)

Reference

MSC

Carlsson 2015

RCT

18

24

0.04

2.75 × 106

Peripheral vein

0

12

[27]

Esfahani 2015

N-RCT

23

12.56

0.3

2 × 106

Peripheral vein

2

12

[28]

Hu 2013

RCT

29

17.6

0.42

2.6 × 107

Peripheral vein

3

24

[29]

Liu 2013

Case study

1

26

0.08

5.2 × 107

Pancreatic dorsal artery

0

36

[30]

Mesples 2013

Case study

3

7

0.15

181 × 106

Intra-hepatic parenchyma

0

12

[31]

Ulyanova 2019

Case study

5

30

Not mentioned

96 × 106

Peripheral vein

0

3

[32]

HSC

Cantu-Rodriguez 2016

N-RCT

16

12

0.25

11.54 × 106

Peripheral vein

7

34

[33]

Ghodsi 2015

N-RCT

16

14.9

1

45 × 106

Peripheral vein

3

12

[34]

Couri 2009

N-RCT

23

18.4

0.05

3.0 × 106

Peripheral vein

20

29.8

[35]

D’Addio 2014

N-RCT

65

20.4

0.83

5.8 × 106

Peripheral vein

46

48

[11]

Ghodsi 2012

RCT

30

21.61

4.32

45 × 106

Peripheral vein

0

12

[36]

Gu 2012

N-RCT

28

17.6

0.22

Not mentioned

Peripheral vein

20

23

[37]

Gu 2014

N-RCT

42

8.04

0.25

Not mentioned

Peripheral vein

3

29

[38]

Gu 2017

N-RCT

40

17.9

0.16

Not mentioned

Peripheral vein

14

48

[39]

Haller 2011

N-RCT

24

5.1

0.25

Not mentioned

Peripheral vein

0

24

[40]

Leal 2012

N-RCT

13

16

0.1

Not mentioned

Peripheral vein

4

24

[41]

Li 2012

N-RCT

13

14.1

0.41

2 × 106

Peripheral vein

3

42.38

[42]

Mesples 2007

N-RCT

12

36

13

1 × 106

Pancreatic circulation

4

6

[43]

Shen 2012

case study

1

21

0

5.8 × 106

Peripheral vein

1

70

[44]

Snarski 2009

case study

1

28

0.07

3.03 × 106

Peripheral vein

1

3

[45]

Snarski 2011

N-RCT

8

25.8

0.16

3 × 106

Peripheral vein

8

7

[46]

Snarski 2016

N-RCT

24

26.5

0.17

4.19 × 106

Peripheral vein

20

52

[47]

Tootee 2015

N-RCT

72

17.52

0.43

45 × 106

Peripheral vein

0

12

[48]

Voltarelli 2007

N-RCT

15

19.2

0.05

11.0 × 106

Peripheral vein

8

18.8

[49]

Xiang 2016

N-RCT

112

15.58

0.1

3 × 106

Peripheral vein

0

15.13

[50]

Ye 2017

N-RCT

18

18.86

0.42

2 × 105

Peripheral vein

0

12

[51]

Zhang 2012

N-RCT

9

18.5

0.16

2.63 × 106

Peripheral vein

6

12

[52]

Combined SC

Cai 2016

RCT

63

19.33

9.24

106.78 × 106 HSC

1.1 × 106 MSC

Dorsal pancreatic artery

0

12

[53]

Dave 2013

Case study

1

30

15

34 × 106 HSC

5.4 × 104 MSC

Portal and thymus circulation

0

13

[54]

Dave 2014

Case study

2

5,9

7,2

51.7 × 106 HSC

1.66 × 104 MSC

portal and thymus circulation

0

18,24

[55]

Dave 2015

N-RCT

10

20.2

8.1

60.55 × 106 HSC

2.7 × 106 MSC

Portal and thymus circulation

0

31.71

[56]

Thakkar 2015

N-RCT

20

19.95

8

2.21 × 104HSC

2.65 × 104 MSC

Portal system and thymus artery

0

54.24

[57]

Trivedi 2008

N-RCT

5

20.2

4.5

3.15 × 106

(HSC + MSC)

Portal circulation

0

2.9

[58]

Trivedi 2011

N-RCT

2

18

11

3.8 × 106

(HSC + MSC)

Portal circulation

0

27

[59]

Vanikar 2010

N-RCT

11

21.1

8.2

26.96 × 108 HSC

11.55 × 107 MSC

Portal circulation

0

7.3

[60]

  1. The eligible papers were evaluated in two main sections; safety and efficacy