Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Origin

Study design

Setting

For women only?

No. of women randomised (% total randomised)

Tailored for low SES?

Mean age, years

Baseline cigarettes per day, mean

Intervention condition

Control condition

Pharmaco-therapy offered to intervention group?

Outcome

Length of intervention ((post randomisation)

Follow-up (post-randomisation)

Bio-chemical verification

SES measure

Andrews et al. 2016 [48]

USA

Two-group pragmatic cluster RCT

Subsidised neighbourhoods

Yes

409 (100%)

Yes

42

12.7

Face-to-face individual, group support, NRT, neighbourhood anti-smoking activities

Written materials

NRT

7-day point prevalence

6 months

6 months, 12 months

Yes

Residence in public housing neighbourhood

Bernstein et al. 2015 [47]

USA

Two-group RCT

Urban emergency department

No

407 (52.2%)

Yes

No female only info

No female only information

Brief face-to-face motivational interviews, referral to phoneline, NRT

Written materials and phone line number

NRT

7-day point prevalence

3 months

3 months

Yes

Receipt of Medicaid or held no insurance

Collins et al. 2019 [49]

USA

Two-group RCT

Paediatric primary care community clinics and community

Yes

300 (100%)

Yes

29.4

12.3

Face-to-face and phone motivational interviews, written material

Brief advice, written material

No

7-day point prevalence

4 months

4 months

Yes

Low-income, racial minority communities

Curry et al. 2003 [50]

USA

Two-group RCT

Paediatric clinics serving ethnically diverse populations of low-income families

Yes

303 (100%)

Yes

34

12.1

Face-to-face motivational interviewing, telephone support, written material

Usual care

No

7-day point prevalence

3 months

3 months, 12 months

No

Ethnically diverse population of low-income families

Etter et al. 2016 [51]

Switzerland

Two-group RCT

Low-income smokers in the general population

No

415 (51.4%)

Yes

No female only info

No female only information

Signed ‘contract to quit’, social supporter designated (friend/family), written materials, website access and escalating financial incentives (gift cards)

Written materials and website access

No

Continued abstinence between 6 and 18 months

6 months

6 months

Yes

Income ≤ 50,000 Swiss francs (CHF) ($55,000, single) or CHF ≤ 100,000 ($110,000, married).

Gilbert et al. 2017 [46]a

England, UK

Two-group RCT

NHS Stop Smoking Services and general practices in England

No

Women in high deprivation1075 (24.5)

All women in RCT 2152 (49.1)

No

All women in sample (not just low SES): 48.0

Not available

Tailored, personalised letter from GP to attend ‘Come and Try It’ taster, repeated letter 3 months later

Generic letter from GP advertising local Stop Smoking Service and available therapies

No

7-day point prevalence

Letter sent at start of study and reminder sent at 3 months

6 months

Yes

Index of Multiple Deprivation score (IMD), official measure of multiple deprivations at the small-area level.

Glasgow et al. 2000 [52]

USA

Two-group RCT

4 Planned Parenthood clinics

Yes

1154 (100%)

Yes

24

12

Brief behavioural support, clinician advice, written materials, telephone support.

Written materials and advice

No

30-day point prevalence

6 weeks

6 weeks, 6 months

Yes

Clinics serves low-income women

Haas et al. 2015 [53]

USA

Two-group RCT

Primary care practices in the Greater Boston area (6 community health centres, 2 community-based practices, 4 hospital-based practices, and 1 medical home)

No

482 (68.2%)

Yes

No female only information

No female only information

Motivational interviewing telephone support and NRT

Usual care

NRT

7-day point prevalence

1 ½ months

9 months

No

Residence in a low (<$45 000) or moderate ($45 000-$67 050) median household income census tract

Manfredi et al. 2004 [54]

USA

Two-group cluster RCT

Prenatal, family planning and paediatric services in public health clinics in Chicago and two suburbs

Yes

1068 (100%)

Yes

29

11

Telephone support, reminder letter, posters, video, advice, written materials and signature on patient-provider agreement form.

Advice, written materials, posters, video

No

7-day point prevalent abstinence

5–8 weeks

2 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months

No

Attendance at public health clinic

Solomon et al. 2000 [55]

USA

Two-group RCT

Community

Yes

214 (100%)

Yes

33

23.7

NRT, telephone support

NRT

NRT

7-day point prevalent abstinence

3 months

3 months and 6 months

Yes

Medicaid-eligible

Solomon et al. 2005 [56]

USA

Two-group RCT

Community

Yes

330 (100%)

Yes

34.2

23.6

NRT, telephone support

NRT

NRT

7-day point prevalent abstinence

4 months

3 months and 6 months

No

Medicaid-eligible

  1. aData from Gilbert’s study is derived from information the author sent upon request. This was broken down by gender and the UK’s Multiple Deprivation Score. We use female-only data from IMD quintiles 4 and 5 only, areas classified as ‘high deprivation’