Skip to main content

Table 2 Sex/gender reporting by review section according to gender of authors

From: Lack of sex-related analysis and reporting in Cochrane Reviews: a cross-sectional study

Sex/gender reporting in each review section

First author (female)

Last author (female)

Both authors femalea

At least one author female

% (N)

P value

% (N)

P value

% (N)

P value

% (N)

P value

Abstract (N=56)

68% (38)

0.019

44.6% (25)

0.701

39.3% (22)

0.015

73.2% (41)

0.531

Methods (N=90)

55.6% (50)

0.623

50.0% (45)

0.105

28.8% (26)

0.465

76.7% (69)

0.114

Descriptive results (N=380)

56.1% (213)

0.147

45.0% (171)

0.027

28.1% (107)

0.127

72.9% (277)

0.012

Analytic results (N=142)

51.4% (73)

0.465

45.8% (65)

0.405

30.3% (43)

0.316

66.9% (95)

0.386

Discussion (N=76)

60.5% (46)

0.195

50.0% (38)

0.161

35.5% (27)

0.046

75.0% (57)

0.315

At least two sections (N=208)

56.7% (118)

0.175

45.2% (94)

0.266

29.3% (61)

0.130

72.6% (151)

0.221

At least three sections (N=84)

60.7% (51)

0.126

51.2%(43)

0.070

36.9% (31)

0.011

75.0% (63)

0.238

All sections (N=14)

57.1% (8)

0.759

57.1% (8)

0.253

35.7% (5)

0.389

78.6% (11)

0.459

  1. aBoth authors are women compared to at least one being a man