Skip to main content

Table 2 PICOS

From: The characteristics of effective technology-enabled dementia education: a systematic review and mixed research synthesis

Parameter

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Participants

All HSCPs with, without, or working towards a professional qualification or registration participating in TEDE in any workplace or educational setting.

Informal (family) caregivers.

Intervention

Any technology-enabled approach to dementia educationa for HSCPs including single interventions, modules, and courses.

Decision support, DVD/video, and telephonic interventions.

Comparator

Studies involving comparator groups or no comparator groups.

–

Outcome

Primary outcome measures were satisfaction; knowledge, skills, and attitudes; behaviours; and results. Secondary outcomes included the educational theories informing TEDE; usability of TEDE; facilitators and barriers to TEDE.

–

Study designb

Randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. Quasi-experimental studies included pre- and post-test designs, control group designs (with or without dependent pre- and post-tests) and time-series designs. Mixed methods studies reporting robust qualitative data collection and analysis methods alongside experimental research methodsc.

Qualitative studies that described participant perceptions of TEDE characteristics/effects.

Descriptive studies and programme evaluations with narrative or survey data of participants’ general impressions of TEDE.

Studies not published in the English language.

Studies published before 2005d.

  1. a TEDE was defined for this review as: ‘a learning or teaching approach to dementia education that is fully or partially mediated by information communication technology’.
  2. b Study selection was intentionally broad to provide a comprehensive account of the various TEDE characteristics. This also recognised the diversity of educational research methods [53]
  3. c Experimental studies reporting additional narrative or survey evaluations of participants’ general impressions of TEDE were not considered to be mixed methods research and were classified as quantitative studies
  4. d The search was limited to 2005 to reflect technological progress since Web 2.0 [54]